Re: Unable to get RealTek 8139C+ to work with re(4) under FreeBSD 6.1

2006-08-17 Thread Dinesh Nair
On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work). ifconfig re0 media 10baset or 100baset always returns error, so there doesn't seem to be

Re: Unable to get RealTek 8139C+ to work with re(4) under FreeBSD 6.1

2006-08-17 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:05:48PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work). ifconfig re0 media

Re: struct dirent question

2006-08-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2006-Aug-16 15:54:25 -0700, Micah wrote: I think you could fake it as follows: struct dirent { __uint32_t d_fileno;/* file number of entry */ __uint16_t d_reclen;/* length of this record */ __uint8_t d_type; /* file type, see

6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Eric Anderson
I've seen this several times now, but this time I got a dump. Basically, the system comes up after unclean shutdown, throws a bunch of filesystems into the background fsck list, and begins 60 seconds later. After some amount of time, the system will lock up, presumably hung waiting on

Re: Unable to get RealTek 8139C+ to work with re(4) under FreeBSD 6.1

2006-08-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i never got re(4) working, and the patch i'm currently using forces the use of rl(4) instead of using re(4). using rl(4) still shows media as none, but it works the way it should with packets going in and out. i've yet to try dag-erling's suggestion of

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:08:31AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: I've seen this several times now, but this time I got a dump. Basically, the system comes up after unclean shutdown, throws a bunch of filesystems into the background fsck list, and begins 60 seconds later. After some amount

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Eric Anderson
On 08/17/06 07:25, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:08:31AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: I've seen this several times now, but this time I got a dump. Basically, the system comes up after unclean shutdown, throws a bunch of filesystems into the background fsck list, and begins

Is it possible to trace the routing socket messages going from the kernel to a particular daemon

2006-08-17 Thread Shriek
Is it possible that we can add some loadable module into the kernel to get a pid of a daemon-process and then somehow trace routing socket messages coming in / going out from the kernel to that particular daemon ? The thing why I am in need of this is that there are two daemons , one daemon is

Re: Is it possible to trace the routing socket messages going from the kernel to a particular daemon

2006-08-17 Thread Joseph Koshy
get a pid of a daemon-process and then somehow trace routing socket messages coming in / going out from the kernel to that particular daemon ? `ktrace -p DAEMON-PID` might be what you want. -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Eric Anderson
On 08/17/06 07:30, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/17/06 07:25, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:08:31AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: I've seen this several times now, but this time I got a dump. Basically, the system comes up after unclean shutdown, throws a bunch of filesystems

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:53:28AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/17/06 07:30, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/17/06 07:25, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:08:31AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: I've seen this several times now, but this time I got a dump. Basically, the system

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-17 Thread Eric Anderson
On 08/17/06 10:04, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:53:28AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/17/06 07:30, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/17/06 07:25, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:08:31AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: I've seen this several times now, but this

Re: Is it possible to trace the routing socket messages going from the kernel to a particular daemon

2006-08-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Shriek wrote: Is it possible that we can add some loadable module into the kernel to get a pid of a daemon-process and then somehow trace routing socket messages coming in / going out from the kernel to that particular daemon ? The thing why I am in need of this is that

Minidumps in FreeBSD 4

2006-08-17 Thread devon . odell
Hi all, I'm sort of curious as to how many people might be interested in this. I'm aware that there are still other companies who also have embedded products / appliances based on FreeBSD 4, and I suppose that's probably the only interest for such a patch. It's available at: