On Thursday 28 June 2007 03:08:34 Garrett Cooper wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and
were
hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's bootloader
will screw things up.
Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and were
hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's bootloader
will screw things up.
Microsoft basically declared the war on alternative OSs so it seems vista
doesn't
Ivan Voras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista
installed and were hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell
you that FreeBSD's bootloader will screw things up.
vista doesn't like:
- bootloaders different than the one used by
On Thursday 28 June 2007 11:33:39 Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
ruinning: No such word
ruining: Wrecking, destroying
running: Working acceptably
--- Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
...
I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
Hmm...
Installation order is important, perhaps you already had FreeBSD before
installing Vista?
In /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c the table (ata_sii_ident) for
Silicon Image chips:
pcirev
{ ATA_SII3512, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, SiI 3512 },
{ ATA_SII3512, 0x00, SIIMEMIO, SIIBUG,ATA_SA150, SiI 3512 },
Indicate there is a revision 0 of the chip
On Thursday 28 June 2007 14:44:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
...
I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
Hmm...
Installation order
7 matches
Mail list logo
