On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:41:41 pm Yuri wrote:
I look at seemingly abandoned sysutils/pstack, last modified upstream
2002-11-27.
It doesn't really work on 9.0 i386, prints some errors.
It's functions, though, is quite desirable if one wants to understand
why some multithreaded program
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:48:29 pm Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:20:17 pm Mark Saad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 March 2012 19:19, John
On 04/02/2012 05:31, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, I don't know if the port has it, but I did some work on pstack a while
ago to make it work with libthread_db so it at least handles i386 ok. It
needs to be modified to use something like libunwind though or some other
unwinder. And possibly it
Basically it consists of (re)compilation and installation of world + kernel
However, 2 parts are always ommited:
Stage 1 - mbr|boot0
Stage 2 - boot
I won't also mention GPT part ...
Stage 3 - loader (is covered by world install)
Should it be expanded to world + kernel + bootcodes
The old way,
On Monday, April 02, 2012 12:39:26 pm Yuri wrote:
On 04/02/2012 05:31, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, I don't know if the port has it, but I did some work on pstack a while
ago to make it work with libthread_db so it at least handles i386 ok. It
needs to be modified to use something like
Hello list,
I am convinced that there is a bug in the CAM code that leads to I/O starvation.
I have already discussed this privately with some. I am now bringing this up to
the general audience to get more feedback.
My setup is that I have 1 RAID controller with 2 arrays connected to
it, da0 and
On 03/30/2012 07:41, Joe Greco wrote:
On 3/29/2012 7:01 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
On 3/28/2012 1:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
FreeBSD 8-STABLE, 8.3, and 9.0 are untested
As much as I'm sensitive to your production requirements, realistically
it's not likely that you'll get a helpful result without
On 03/30/2012 07:41, Joe Greco wrote:
On 3/29/2012 7:01 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
On 3/28/2012 1:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
FreeBSD 8-STABLE, 8.3, and 9.0 are untested
As much as I'm sensitive to your production requirements, realistically
it's not likely that you'll get a helpful result
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 5:40:50 pm Maninya M wrote:
Thanks.
I've tried this. Still getting some allocation problems.
if (temp_regs.r_eax != addr)
warn(Wanted space at address 0x%.8x, mmap2 system call returned
0x%.8x. This could be a problem.,addr,temp_regs.r_eax);
What can I
I'm assessing possible summer of code projects, and the EFI work caught
my attention. I've been running FreeBSD on a macbook for a little under
a year now, and booting on EFI is definitely an interest to me. Does
anyone know if this is still a viable project proposal? I certainly
have the
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:48:29 pm Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:20:17 pm Mark Saad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM,
On 4/2/2012 11:43 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
As a user, you can't win. If you don't report
a problem, you get criticized. If you report a problem but can't figure
out how to reproduce it, you get criticized. If you can reproduce it
but you don't submit a workaround, you get criticized. If you
On 4/2/2012 11:43 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
As a user, you can't win. If you don't report
a problem, you get criticized. If you report a problem but can't figure
out how to reproduce it, you get criticized. If you can reproduce it
but you don't submit a workaround, you get criticized. If
cc hackers@
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yongcong Du ycdu.vmc...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:23 AM
Subject: [gsoc2012] Port NetBSD's UDF implementation
To: a...@freebsd.org, netch...@freebsd.org
Hi Andriy and Alexander,
Firstly, let me introduce myself;) I'm a
14 matches
Mail list logo
