* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 20:16] wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 20:02] wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >>
> >>>* Daniel Eisc
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 20:02] wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 19:46] wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi guys, we nee
* Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 20:00] wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 19:46] wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > >
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071002 19:46] wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >Hi guys, we need critical sections for userland here.
> >
> >This is basically to avoid a process being switched out while holding
> >a user level s
ement limits to this so that a haywire application
is not able to be "critical" forever.
Any help would be appreciated.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
* Paul Saab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070712 11:14] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >I would like to export the various parameters from subr_param.c
> >into sysctl, these nodes would include the names from the following
> >tunables as well as others in these files.
> &g
H("kern.maxssiz", &maxssiz);
sgrowsiz = SGROWSIZ;
TUNABLE_ULONG_FETCH("kern.sgrowsiz", &sgrowsiz);
any objections?
I don't see any obvious way to get at these values on a running
system.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
___
f
x27;t there be some sort of DELAY in there?
My platform has an emulated serial device in hardware, so it
may be that the loop could run a LOT faster than transmit can
happen...
any ideas of what the DELAY should be?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-hacke
| POLLERR | POLLHUP | POLLNVAL | \
POLLRDNORM |POLLRDBAND | POLLWRBAND | POLLINIGNEOF)
- u += snprintf(tmp + used, per_fd,
+ u = snprintf(tmp + used, per_fd,
"%s%d 0x%hx%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s ",
i > 0 ? " " : "",
me know where we go from here!
The only thing I have not implemented is trigger timeouts inside
the autofs. I'll get to it eventually though.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480
ll to Please be
> careful out there.
>
> Valerie
> 2003 Triumph Sprint ST
___
Bikergoths-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sfgoth.com/mailman/listinfo/bikergoths-l
- End forwarded message -
--
- Alfred Perlstein
* John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040822 00:18] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 23:47 -0700:
> >
> > I have a sysctl node that takes a struct like so:
> >
> > struct mysysctldata {
> > (data here)
> >
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040821 13:29] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> >I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure
> >be passed around, but inside that structure are several point
ing IN the data from moredata?
I need to make a copy of the sysctl req, but... I'm not sure what
to initialize the 'lock' member to.
Any hints would be appeciated.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROT
nd would
exit with a non-zero exit status?
Ideas? Better ideas?
The reason I want this is to avoid extracting a tarball
over a directory that has files in it that are newer than
the tarball.
Neither tar nor find seem to make this easy...
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040716 0
c, F_EXECDIR },
+ { "-exit", c_exit, f_exit, 0 },
{ "-false", c_simple, f_not, 0 },
{ "-flags", c_flags,f_flags, 0 },
{ "-follow",c_follow, f_always_true, 0 },
.
Lastly, please reply privately!
thanks!
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
s address space.
I was looking at pmap_qenter() but it didn't see attractive because
it's for "short term mappings", this mapping will exist for quite a
while.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [
* Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040424 03:14] wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 01:59:13AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Have you guys thought of using aio or at least another process
> > to parallelize IO? (One to read files, and one t
* Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040113 15:41] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >It will refuse to strip symbols if:
> >
> >foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
> >
> >But I need it to.
>
> I suppose there are good reasons why you
> canno
* Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040110 03:17] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
> > .o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
> > th
rom obj2.o
even after I combine the object files.
Any hints?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Is there a way to turn a .so into a .o? I would like to link
something statically, and I'm doing a bunch of work on the
symbol table and would like to avoid a mess with using ar(1).
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480
s blocking sigpipe can be hairy inside
> > libraries. Now that we can selectively disable SIGPIPE using
> > the setsockopt using Apple's code this is less of an issue.
>
>Yes, I think checking for SS_CATSENDMORE (and returning EPIPE) prior to
> checking SS_ISCON
end(9). I could
add the check, is there a reason not to? The one reason I
figured was that sometimes blocking sigpipe can be hairy inside
libraries. Now that we can selectively disable SIGPIPE using
the setsockopt using Apple's code this is less of an issue.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
-
error = ENOTCONN;
- goto done;
- }
if (uap->offset < 0) {
error = EINVAL;
goto done;
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell:
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031221 14:31] wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031221 12:08] wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > > > * Alf
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031221 12:08] wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031221 02:47] wrote:
> > > How do I get __thread to work for me?
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.o
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031221 02:47] wrote:
> How do I get __thread to work for me?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html
>
> it seems the assembler chokes on it?
Taking this code:
#include
__thread int x;
int
main(int argc, char **a
How do I get __thread to work for me?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html
it seems the assembler chokes on it?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL
* Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031201 00:27] wrote:
> At 00:18 01/12/2003 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >Then type these commands into the loader:
> >unload kernel
> >load /ikernel
> >load -t mfs_root /mfsroot
> >set vfs.root.mountfrom
> >bo
ool if this could be automated[1], perhaps by setting
the boot partition to the swap partition and setting it up temporarily
as a ufs filesystem and then... oh... well...
[1] http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity1426.html
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
log(LOG_DEBUG, "psm%d: failed to get status (psmintr).\n",
+ sc->unit);
+ sc->inputbytes = 0;
+ continue;
+ }
+ sc->lastvalid = tv;
/*
* A kludge for Kensington device!
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Re
blem.
So, what I'm asking is...
Can anyone state ahead of time why they would object to this?
(please reply publically)
Who will test it?
(privately plz)
Thanks!
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,&
.
thank you,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
that it would be safest to require
userland to set either RFPROC or RFTHREAD.
Yes, the manpage is out of date. What the hell is a sigact anyhow?
Can someone please fixup the manpage? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technol
the refcount on the fdesc is still > 0 we leave it
alone and leak lock structures.
p1 exits
Does this make sense as a problem area? I think we should only
allow filedesc sharing if RFTHREAD is set. RFTHREAD seems to get
it right because of the peers/leader mechanism.
thanks,
--
-Alf
able adding an error case to uma_zalloc, but who knows...
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021115 12:17] wrote:
> :Will the knobs allow one to link /bin and /sbin against full blown
> :libc? That would be nice as we can then start using pam and user
> :management in / with dynamic modules (finally!).
> :
> :--
> :-
ce as we can then start using pam and user
management in / with dynamic modules (finally!).
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
T
* Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021114 15:42] wrote:
> Please see earlier threads on hackers@ about bloat in libc and dynamic
> linking of /[s]bin. Tim Kientzle submitted a patch that breaks exit's
> dependency on malloc which saves space in the programs that don't
> otherwise use malloc.
>
>
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 14:46] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:37:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > libfetch seems to have a bug such that if a disconnect happens at
> > a particular point it spins in a tight loop.
> >
> > I trac
royed. If you don't
> want to track its page, can you hook it into ipcrm(1)?
I don't really have a problem with it unless it's not necessary,
I'll see if I can get access to solaris to figure out wth they
do. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of aski
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020918 18:40] wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, any of you guys have a copy of the standards documents that
> > describe the sem_* API?
> >
> > I have a question...
> >
did the sem_init?
Or am I going to have to do some nastyness to record the memory
location where the semaphore is and track that page's allocation?
little help here... :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,
* Andrew R. Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020805 09:15] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> :Can anyone point out or provide me with a suite to regression test
> :sysv_ipc, specifically semaphores, message queues and shared memory?
> :
> :I'm
I'll be in NY for the next two weeks, I expect connectivity to be
spotty, if anyone wants to get together let me know!
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [#bsdcode/efnet/irc.prison.net]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start as
s put in tight loops to keep a process from hogging the cpu
> (release remainder of the timeslice). Does this mentality apply to freebsd,
> and is there such a call?
see the sched_yield(2) syscall.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [#bsdcode/efnet/irc.prison.net]
'Instead of
nction pr_header(), it uses SYSCTL to grab system
uptime.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for Fre
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020716 02:17] wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 02:39:36AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > NetBSD has cleaned up sbin/rcorder quite a bit, and chance someone
> > feels up to integrating thier changes?
>
> When did they do
NetBSD has cleaned up sbin/rcorder quite a bit, and chance someone
feels up to integrating thier changes?
If I were to do it, would I need to 'cvs import' or simply commit
the changes?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software
* Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020627 09:21] wrote:
> hi,
> how can i reboot - from the serial console - once im in the kernel
> debugger?
type 'panic' or 'sync' or 'boot' one of those should work.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED
ssue I am seeing (since
> either way, all those greatly increased SHM/SEM settings I added are not
> using KVA) ??
Without kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 you will use more KVA, however do
realize that with it the shared memory is non-pageable, meaning it
can not be swapped out if something else n
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020625 13:08] wrote:
>
> > > > At what point does it eat KVA that is other than for the backing
> > > > data structures?
> > >
> > > It eats address space, not RAM. And even if the mappings are not
> > > active (which they usually are, because of LRU and proc
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020624 19:58] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020624 19:17] wrote:
> > >
> > > System V shared memory is allocated out of KVA space (annoying,
> > > but true).
>
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020624 19:17] wrote:
>
> System V shared memory is allocated out of KVA space (annoying,
> but true).
You keep saying this but the backing object allocated for sysvshm
is taken from either an OBJT_PHYS or OBJT_SWAP object.
At what point does it eat KVA that
is just plain wrong, though, because
> the queue mechanisms make no such (documented) guarentee.
You're right, but other than await() why would a process find itself
on a sleep queue if not in SSLEEP?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece o
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020623 13:14] wrote:
> This doesn't look right at all. It looks like wakeup is not restarting
> properly:
>
> s = splhigh();
> qp = &slpque[LOOKUP(ident)];
> restart:
> TAILQ_FOREACH(p, qp, p_procq) {
> if (p->
* Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020623 00:36] wrote:
>
>
> --On Saturday, June 22, 2002 22:23:59 -0700 Alfred Perlstein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I should know, I
> >ported it fr
to do
> > everything I want to with FreeBSD. It's NFS is missing locking support
> > but it's very fast and works very well with FreeBSD and Mac OS X
> > clients. I haven't used it with anything else.
Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I shou
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020622 01:56] wrote:
>
> What it does is the userland hangs, but the kernel keeps running.
>
...
> I'm mostly just curious if this kind of crash (userland hung but kernel
> running) is a possible outcome of someone in a jail fiddling with those
> /dev nodes,
.
> duck that identity...make full use of the internet to hide the source of
> your venting.
>
> bill...alfred..was some kid denied a port or something to warrent this silly
> temper tantrum? :)
All I really have to say about the matter is that nothing says "lack of
gen
* echo dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020614 00:06] wrote:
> I am pooling in as many different ways of sorting data in C i can anyone
> have a fav??? If anyone can give me some ideas on the best way to sort data
> in C would be helpful.. Thanks
man qsort
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[
checking will be required. Can anyone confirm or
> deny this?
4.x should be pretty compatible with respect to 4.2 to 4.3 to 4.4
and so on, if you come across any jitter then you can probably
use __FreeBSD_version from sys/param.h.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of as
t can't be interupted and just wait
>there?
*sigh*
Would you be willing to field a problem report this vague?
Which web browser? How are you inputting a ^C? etc.etc...
Applications have the option to ignore ^C, they can also futz
with the terminal settings to that ^C doesn't wor
ow, and then worry
> about it later.
Which is what you should do. What was the point of asking me if you
weren't going to take my advice? *sigh*
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why sof
need it to
> asked the questions and then put it self into the background. If someone
> could give me some liks to some docs I woould be vary grateful..
Have your program ask questions, then fork a child process, then
have the parent exit, it will effectively detach.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020529 00:42] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> > defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen
> > is for assembler files where old sty
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020527 11:22] wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> : defined. Do we want to do the same?
_STDC__)
telnet/ring.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(LINT_ARGS)
yacc/skeleton.c:"#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__",
yacc/skeleton.c:"#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__",
yacc/skeleton.c:"#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__",
--
-Alfred Per
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020520 15:15] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > level not edge. I think you can also use the CURSIG macro to check
> > for pending signals if you don't want to yeild.
> >
> > --
>
think you can also use the CURSIG macro to check
for pending signals if you don't want to yeild.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.&
err(1, "T_dev_T %d != %d", l2, sizeof(*d));
+ if (l2 != sizeof(*d)) {
+ warnx("T_dev_T %d != %d", l2, sizeof(*d));
+ return (0);
+ }
if ((int)(*d) != -1) {
if (minor(*d) > 255 || minor(*d) < 0)
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020518 10:05] wrote:
>
> Attached, please find the status report covering activity from February
> 2002 - April 2002. This may also be found on the FreeBSD.org web page
> (once the site rebuilds sometime today) at:
[snip]
Excellent report, it really shows t
nc waitqueue
}
lock filedesc
fdrop all files gotten before and remove from async wait queue
it really seems like overkill for the case where you're doing the
right thing, ie, one big process select'ing/poll'ing on lots of
descriptors.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Inst
d average
> spikes - this can be a bit alarming but doesn't actually affect things very
> much.
Is there a paper on avoiding this? I know how Linux does it, but
they seem to need to hammer on the scheduler lock quite a bit as a
workaround.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
* Zhihui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 10:33] wrote:
>
> Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
> of memory. The time command gives result like this:
>
> 6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
>
> I want to know why CPU is running only 5
* Andrew R. Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 09:54] wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> :* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote:
> :> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> :> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however yo
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
> > VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
> > ADVLOCK VOP.
> You'd rea
t; > to
> >
> > fp->l_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
ADVLOCK VOP.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a pie
* David Greenman-Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020513 15:40] wrote:
> >* David Greenman-Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020513 13:10] wrote:
> >>
> >>The card doesn't drop the packet if the IP/TCP checksum is wrong. In my
> >> tests, I did a software checksum on the supposedly bad packet, and f
* David Greenman-Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020513 13:10] wrote:
>
>The card doesn't drop the packet if the IP/TCP checksum is wrong. In my
> tests, I did a software checksum on the supposedly bad packet, and found it
> to be good every time. So it DMA's correctly, the checksum is just cal
* Ed Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020511 13:13] wrote:
> At Yahoo! we use a lot of shared memory, both in the form of .so's and
> for IPC. It would be very useful to be able to accurately measure the
> amount of shared and private memory associated with a process, the
> number of references to a giv
27;ll
> just bug you off-list. *grin*)
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/deltas/bind_cpu.diff.gz
I'm not sure if it works and/or applies any longer. I asked for
John and Jake to review it but they never gave me any sort of
answer about it.
Maybe I'll clean it up soon, maybe I won&#
* andrew mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020506 17:54] wrote:
>
> [andrew]$ BTW, your attitude ever so *SLIGHTLY*
> reminds
> me of the largely pretentious and cryptic LINUX
> community. let's not all get too big for our
> britches,
> eh?
Your attitude is pretty rotten as well, quit whining, learn t
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 07:19] wrote:
>
> So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
> down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
It will not cause any problems unless you don't have enough memory.
--
-Alfred Perlste
ter problems as it will
greatly reduce the amount of kernel memory required to track
shared memory segments at the expense of making them non-pageable.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why
* andrew mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:37] wrote:
> anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
> BSD/Solaris machines?
>
> i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
> a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
> offered.
1) This doesn't belong on -hackers.
* Nelson, Trent . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020501 06:41] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on porting the Linux Cisco VPN client kernel module to
> FreeBSD. The API interface between the OS and their actual driver has four
> spinlock functions that operate around a handle (void *) to a ``critical
>
* Rob Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020424 10:03] wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a deadlock problem I'm seeing in a kernel module, and
> I wonder if someone could answer some questions I had about spinlocks.
You shouldn't be using spinlocks.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; Anyway, is there a reason that the maxstack is 64MB only ?
Because 64MB of stack should be enough for anybody?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumu
>
> # To change Kerberos options
> #KerberosAuthentication no
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of softwar
error = EINVAL;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/* OK */
break;
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using &
* Alessandro de Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020405 12:08] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:00:05PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Wow, thanks for the super-fast answer! :))
>
>
> > > on my production servers' kernel so in the very rare case of crash
* Alessandro de Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020405 11:57] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Well, the subj says more or less all.. ;-)
>
> On 4.x-STABLE systems, a kernel compiled with "options DDB" and
> "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" is, at execution, slower than one compiled
> without that two settings ?
> Or is
* Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020405 11:06] wrote:
> Or maybe make it only come out of screensaver if there is a console
> message (i.e.: kernel messages, etc...), but stay there during tty
> activity.
That would be nice also, but I'm more interested in having the
screen saver work like a r
inutes.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
them personally. sometimes just seeing a message like
that and 100% of the viewers are like, "well someone will commit
that" and no one does. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking wh
cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi
I would also make sure to follow this list (freebsd-hackers)
and possibly freebsd-current.
best of luck and thanks for taking an interest!
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,&quo
d/operands structs as input, and/or the status file offer
> elaborate structures as output, or an lwp directory, etc?
Not really, if someone where to present a patchset and documentation
then it would likely be integrated.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why
101 - 200 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
