# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-09-27 05:39:10 -0400:
when trying to d/l the following file
1 www www 551M Sep 16 13:23 20050818002.zip
via apache1.3.33/php 4.3.11, i get that in the logs
i thought it was because i dont have enough swap so i did
[...]
See ulimit(1), search for
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-11-12 04:11:22 +0100:
The only real problem with having bash as /bin/sh is that people tend
to write scripts using bash-specific features and forget that such
scripts are not portable to systems using a less powerful /bin/sh.
Or the other way around. Bash (at
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-10-03 02:02:26 +0300:
On 2004-10-02 17:22, Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:57 PM +0300 10/2/04, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-10-02 21:23, Lee Harr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
chflags sunlnk /
?
Setting sunlink on / will only
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-22 08:02:04 +0100:
Roman Neuhauser writes:
Did you type the exact THREE commands as shown above?
Of course, it's been three weeks since I had that problem so I
would be insane to claim I have exact recollection. I might have
been typing
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-04 19:02:07 -0700:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:35:53AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
loader.conf causes a panic very similar to the one described here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-21 12:03:36 +0100:
Kris Kennaway writes:
loader to ignore loader.con) was that unload didn't help, it
showed the kernel and modules were unloaded, but subsequent
load kernel
boot
or
boot kernel
loaded
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-21 23:54:43 +0100:
Roman Neuhauser writes:
unload
load /boot/kernel/kernel
boot
does it for me.
Of course I run unload as the first step. It wrote it unloaded the
modules, and the started loading them again booting the new kernel
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-10 01:01:26 -0400:
At 10:50 PM +0200 4/9/04, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@
which hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing
the authors too.
I must have missed the earlier message...
Perhaps
This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@ which
hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing the authors too.
Two revisions need MFC in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78r2=1.79
Silences gobs of warnings in
Why does /bin/sh insert 0x81, or 129, or SYNBASE, before every non-word
character in here-doc delimiters? It grows
'END-of-vietnamese/x-unikey/files/patch-src::unikey-gtk::Makefile.am'
which is 69 characters, well below EOFMARKLEN (79) to 80 characters.
Should I file a PR?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
loader.conf causes a panic very similar to the one described here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-alpha/2003-August/000656.html
Hi Mark, please fix random.ko :-)
If a backtrace would be useful, I can retype it in an
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-01 16:53:19 -0500:
I have a program that I have the is supposed to run forever. I log any
output to a log file. It is run in a startup script like thie:
program_name $err_log 21
The problem is that after newsyslog rotates the $err_log file, no more
data
Would some kind soul please MFC this?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78r2=1.79
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-03-10 08:35:17 -0600:
Unless somebody chimes in and just really wants me to stick this out to the
bitter end, I'm about to kill my attempted import of the FreeBSD src/
repository into a test Subversion instance.
The process has just passed the 1 month mark:
USER
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-02-12 16:48:25 -0400:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
I missed the original thread here, so this point may have already been
I'd like to thank everyone who's replied to my questions regarding
the beastie menu and 4th. my mail has attracted far more attention
than I expected.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of
(semi-)freeze aren't as widely known as you seem to think.
E. g. yesterday or today I received an email
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:53 +0300:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:29:34 +
Doug Rabson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The three main showstoppers for moving FreeBSD to subversion would be:
[...]
2. Support for $FreeBSD$ - user-specified keywords are not supported
and won't be
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
replies :).
I dislike the boot menu in CURRENT, and would prefer something that
*
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:35 -0700:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
replies
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-08 18:33:40 +1100:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Limitations of CVS don't exactly help either. The fact that you need
direct access to the repository to be able to copy a tree with
history (repocopy) as opposed
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-07 23:17:31 -0800:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or
maybe it's just I've gotten more involved, but out of the last four
months (2003/09/07-today
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-07 14:29:35 +:
Paul Robinson writes:
And for those of you who normally shout Submit a patch - well, I'm
thinking about it. :-)
I've been thinking of your objection to the submit a patch reply,
and I offer this as a proto-thought on how it can be applied
According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
tcp/udp port 1000 is for cadlock2. Our /etc/services claims
1000/tcp is cadlock, and 1000/ucp ock.
Also: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/54371
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-10-08 09:49:21 +0100:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:25:25AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
tcp/udp port 1000 is for cadlock2. Our /etc/services claims
1000/tcp is cadlock, and 1000/ucp ock.
Also: http
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-09-16 16:58:06 -0400:
At 10:23 AM -1000 9/16/03, Clifton Royston wrote:
In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some
simple hack to disregard these wildcard A records, short of
requesting zone transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via
peering with
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-30 15:57:51 +0400:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, 19:29-0400, Zak Johnson wrote:
On 2003-06-28 20:27+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
for instance?
misc/25851
I am not familiar with sysinstall code, sorry.
bin/32433
Fixed in -current.
I see you assigned
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-23 11:45:37 -0400:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Socketd wrote:
Would it be possible to have this configuration and not having the
system fail (because of lacking rights or something):
/var/mail noexec
nosuid would be fine here also.
# [EMAIL
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-05-16 15:30:01 +0300:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 02:48:12PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-04-26 14:53:36 +0300:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:44:00PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Try the following makefile: it works if called
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-11 14:25:35 -0800:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Thanks guys. Is there a clean way to make sure that the description
will always begin on the line below the tag line? IOW, with
.Bl -tag, if the actual tag width is less than that of -width's
argument
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-10 14:40:41 -0800:
In the meantime, is there an easy way to switch over my existing CVS
tree to a mirror? (And is there a mirror?)
If you're talking about a working copy, then it's really easy:
find $wcdir -type d -name CVS | while read d; do
sed
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-10 12:17:44 -0600:
In the last episode (Feb 10), Roman Neuhauser said:
I'm writing a man page for a utility I'm writing, and I want the option
listing look like this:
OPTIONS
-h, --help
Print a brief help message.
-n, --dry-run
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-11 08:29:54 -0600:
In the last episode (Feb 11), Roman Neuhauser said:
Thanks guys. Is there a clean way to make sure that the
description will always begin on the line below the tag line?
IOW, with .Bl -tag, if the actual tag width is less than
Hi there,
two quick mdoc(7) questions:
I'm writing a man page for a utility I'm writing, and I want the option
listing look like this:
OPTIONS
-h, --help
Print a brief help message.
-n, --dry-run
Don't actually connect to the server. DDL generated by mktable.php
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
of them being -r.
Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle
symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep from
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-09 17:29:57 -0500:
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
of them being -r
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you sent me a copy again, please, don't do it.
1. I
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:57:25 -0800:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you sent me a copy again
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-13 11:49:15 -0600:
In the last episode (Jan 13), Roman Neuhauser said:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
To: Roman Neuhauser
thanks for not cc'ing me.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 15:18:43 -0800:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
So, do you manually put yahoo.com SOA records in your DNS?
no.
How do you answer requests for yahoo.com.
it's simple:
[ ... I have a DNS caching server
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-09 12:48:03 -0800:
To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please don't cc me.
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
! This is called a split horizon DNS, and you need to run two
! DNS servers, one interior, and one exterior, both authoritative
! for your domain
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you sent me a copy again, please, don't do it.
1. I don't want one, I'll read your message on the list.
2. it's futile: your provider's MTA breaks RFC 2821:
2.3.5
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-06 17:36:52 +0100:
! Background: This environment should be configured to use
! an internet connection for internet-relevant things, but to
! work flawlessly without such a connection as long as matters
! do concern only systems within the LAN.
!
! This is
Hi there,
continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following
inconsistency. I would even call it a bug.
In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
both the pattern and replacement,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
both the pattern and replacement
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 16:09:47 +0300:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make
I would like to thank everybody who replied to my post, and especially
to Chad David and Chuck Robey. Thanks to your help I have now the system
working as I need (with the exception of speed, but that is another
issue :)
I have another p?make related question, though. I've searched the
archives,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-01 04:52:14 -0700:
Thus spake Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have another p?make related question, though. I've searched the
archives, but cannot find an answer: what is the actual relation between
our (FreeBSD) make, and pmake? It looks like our make
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-01 09:22:50 -0600:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:58:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I need to run my newly created Makefiles on one sorry RedHat box, and
the pmake package just doesn't cut it. So, since I couldn't find any
other rpm on redhat.com, what
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 17:20:56 -0400:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
yup. or the fact that /usr/share/doc/psd/12.make/paper.ascii.gz
documents conditionals in the form #keyword instead of .keyword
(that might work, i haven't tried, but shouldn't
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 13:08:04 -0400:
The odd behavior of variables is only one item from a whole list of them.
Go take a look at what use: means, if you want a headache.
you mean .USE? looks quite powerful... a can of worms if misused. :)
Or, how about the behavior of
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 16:10:59 +0100:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:05:36PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
[... re periodic diffs]
And, what would the preferred interface be? Most of periodic.conf
knobs are bools, but I'm not sure
diff_{context,traditional,unified}_format={YES
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 13:08:04 -0400:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Now, saying don't do it is nice, but I'd like to know why.
Why doesn't this work? Also, what documentation (besides the
source) is there that covers variable scopes? See the second
Hi,
does this list require subscription to allow posts?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
doesn't say so, but neither of my two attempts (before I subscribed) has
shown up in the archives.
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
Hi,
I've sent two messages about (p)make to questions@ but have not received
any replies, so I ask here.
I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
stumbled across a few variable related issues where
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:06:12 -0400:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
stumbled across a few variable related issues where
[repost from questions@; no replies received since 2002-09-17]
Hi there,
various /etc/periodic scripts mail root diffs of a few config files etc.
grep on my (quite fresh) STABLE box shows that except for
/etc/periodic/daily/210.backup-aliases, all the diff invocations use the
old format. I have
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 16:08:11 +0100:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
thanks a lot for your reply. You're right: I'm viewing Makefiles
as sequential programs, which obviously (even to me) is not quite
true, but I'm having difficulty
[sent only to Chad by mistake]
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:35:54 -0600:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
unless you explicitly export things as environment variables,
or set them on a command line when re-invoking Make.
i'm not sure what
59 matches
Mail list logo
