On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Doug White wrote:
>That would be correct, at least looking at the appropriate code in
>/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c. The read-only sysctls kern.ipc.nmbclusters and
>kern.ipc.nmbufs hold the max mbuf clusters and the max mbufs, respecively.
>kern.ipc.nmbufs is bound to an nmbufs va
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Doug White wrote:
>
> >When people refer to mbufs, they refer to mbuf clusters, of which there's
> >a fixed number. The kernel will allocate more mbufs as necessary.
>
> Uhm, actually, mbufs are also allocated from mb_ma
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Doug White wrote:
>When people refer to mbufs, they refer to mbuf clusters, of which there's
>a fixed number. The kernel will allocate more mbufs as necessary.
Uhm, actually, mbufs are also allocated from mb_map. Thus, they are
also capped. (Unless I'm missing so
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Kris Kirby wrote:
>
> I was just pondering recently as to what the acceptable levels of size and
> amount of mbufs in use are. I vaguely seem to recall that if you run out
> of mbufs, the machine will either panic or reboot. My reason for asking is
> simple:
>
> root:ninbo
I was just pondering recently as to what the acceptable levels of size and
amount of mbufs in use are. I vaguely seem to recall that if you run out
of mbufs, the machine will either panic or reboot. My reason for asking is
simple:
root:ninbox: {13} netstat -m
767/1152 mbufs in use:
509
5 matches
Mail list logo
