In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sergey Babkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
By the way the journaling filesystems don't neccessary guarantee that
you won't need fsck: for example, if VXFS crashes at a particularly
bad moment, it will require you to do fsck -o full which is as slow
as the fsck on
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:39:58AM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
All I can say is... holy shit!
Dude, you kick ass. At work I've been dealing with Linux's crappy NFS
implementation for years, while FreeBSD has always been pretty damn
In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of
JFS or XFS.
The problems
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of
JFS
* Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011218 19:45] wrote:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
be available
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
By the way the journaling filesystems don't neccessary guarantee that
you won't need fsck: for example, if VXFS crashes at a particularly
bad moment, it will require you to do fsck -o full which is as slow
as the fsck on traditional UFS.
Yeah, but that's not
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Mike Bristow wrote:
I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust
I'm trying to get the license issue clarified, then it can go in
/usr/src/tools/regression.
- Jordan
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guy Harris of NetApp sent me a whole mess-o-changes to it and when I
went to forward them to you, I found that I must have been in
I gave out fsx source code at the recent CIFS (SMB) plugfest. If I make
the 2002 Connectathon I'll give it out there too. I don't test it on
Windows so those defines may be in need of repair. Please send me any
patches or cool additions.
Guy Harris of NetApp sent me a whole mess-o-changes
JFWIW, you can build fsx with minimal or no changes on Windows with David
Korn's UWIN kit. All of the other posix-y kits have internal problems
that will cause spurious failures.
If you want to use Windows boxes as test clients (probably a good idea)
this is fairly important...
I gave
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brandon
D. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[snip]
but it still can't touch the FreeBSD NFS implementation. The more
robust you make it the easier it is for me to argue for deployment of
more FreeBSD systems in NFS server roles. The only advantage Linux has
got
:
: Very cool. Good job!
:
:-DG
:
:David Greenman
:Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
Thanks! I'm slowly whacking the bugs. I just fixed another one...
vtruncbuf() handles the buffers beyond the file EOF but doesn't handle
the buffer straddling the
Thanks! I'm slowly whacking the bugs. I just fixed another one...
That's awesome... I'd hoped this program might help you find a few
things, but I never expected you to find so many bugs in NFS
so... quickly! I certainly didn't expect you to tickle any local
filesystem problems either.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 02:58:28AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
@#$@#$ crap. I think I found a dirty-mmap edge case with truncation.
It requires a change to vm_page_set_validclean(), which of course is
one of the core routines in the VM system.
Basically what happens is
:Matt,
:
:what the hell, this seems to very near by a problem I wanted to
:report since a week:
:
:in a data acquisition I have a write process writing to a file
:backed shared mmapped ringbuffer. There can be several reader
:processes on this this ringbuffer. Now once i killed the writer for
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Matt,
:
:what the hell, this seems to very near by a problem I wanted to
:report since a week:
:
:in a data acquisition I have a write process writing to a file
:backed shared mmapped ringbuffer. There can be several reader
Very cool. Good job!
-DG
David Greenman
Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com
Pave the road of life with opportunities.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the
17 matches
Mail list logo
