On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to run timed on
my 5.0 alpha from a 4.4 x86 box proves disastrous. 5.0 x86 clients work fine.
The alpha keeps getting its date set back into 1970:
After quick look at
On 20-Nov-01 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to run timed
on
my 5.0 alpha from a 4.4 x86 box proves disastrous. 5.0 x86 clients work
fine.
The alpha keeps getting its date
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fixed
this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bit of
a pain. :( Perhaps it should use uint32_t? Or perhaps struct tsp should
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to
run timed on my 5.0 alpha from a 4.4 x86 box proves disastrous. 5.0
x86 clients work fine. The alpha keeps getting its date set back
into 1970:
It's probably
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to
run timed on my 5.0 alpha from a 4.4 x86 box proves disastrous. 5.0
x86 clients work fine. The alpha keeps getting its date set
On 20-Nov-01 Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has
fixed
this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bit
of
a pain. :( Perhaps it should use
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:57:06PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to
run timed on my 5.0 alpha from a 4.4 x86 box proves disastrous.
Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fix
ed
this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bi
t of
a pain. :( Perhaps it should use
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:57:06PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something? Trying to
run timed on my 5.0 alpha
On 20-Nov-01 John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:57:06PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some major 64 bit issues or something?
On 20-Nov-01 John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:57:06PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-Nov-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:06:28PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
Does timed have some
11 matches
Mail list logo
