Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. [...]
Alexander, when you say disk-less
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Kevin Sanders wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less configuration
is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go through series of
hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. [...]
On 12/3/06, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If using FreeBSD on i386/amd64 boxes, use PXE. There are quite a few instant
setup web pages out there that tell you how to get it running. pxeboot makes
life incredibly easy, as you can load kernels, modules, configurations, etc,
over NFS.
Quoting Kevin Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:23:24 -0800):
On 12/3/06, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If using FreeBSD on i386/amd64 boxes, use PXE. There are quite a few
instant
setup web pages out there that tell you how to get it running. pxeboot
makes
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to know if
there is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel
development for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc it seems
that qemu seems to be the best option. Is this tool used by most of the
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if there
is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel development
for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc it seems that qemu
seems to be the best option. Is this tool used by most of the FreeBSD
Qemu / vmware is probably the best way to go at the moment.
On 12/2/06, Vishal Patil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if there
is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel development
for FreeBSD. Reading different
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:28:57 -0500
Vishal Patil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if
there is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel
development for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc
it seems that
Vishal Patil wrote:
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to know if
there is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel
development for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc it
seems
that qemu seems to be the best option. Is this tool
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go
through series of hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs and
without the risk of terminally damaging any
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Vishal Patil wrote:
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to know if
there is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel
development for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. [...]
Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you
referring
13 matches
Mail list logo
