On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 06:19] wrote:
All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
No need for that. (yet) :-)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 06:02:22PM +0100, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 06:19] wrote:
As far as I can see, FreeBSD (nor any other Unix system I'm aware
of) does not provide a way to do
Does anyone remember the article in Phrack, issue 53 I think, about
speaking Forth to a Sun's boot-prom in order to write a '0' into the UID
member of one's shell's struct proc?
--
Ben
220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, void wrote:
:Does anyone remember the article in Phrack, issue 53 I think, about
:speaking Forth to a Sun's boot-prom in order to write a '0' into the UID
:member of one's shell's struct proc?
Yes. It works a treat. Similar steps let you do the same thing with DDB
or
All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifically of the
effective UID and GID, but I might have to tinker with the real and saved
UID's,
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 06:19] wrote:
All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
No need for that. (yet) :-)
There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifically
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 06:19] wrote:
All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
No need for that. (yet) :-)
..possibly because I did not make my intentions clear enough :)
There are
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 09:02] wrote:
Well there's setuid for you.
Hmm.. I've also received two private mails so far, pointing me to setuid().
The problem is, I want to force a new UID on *another* process without
its knowledge. setuid() only works on the process
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Pentchev writes:
: There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
: to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifically of the
: effective UID and GID, but I might have to tinker with the real and saved
: UID's,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Pentchev writes:
: Hmm.. I've also received two private mails so far, pointing me to setuid().
: The problem is, I want to force a new UID on *another* process without
: its knowledge. setuid() only works on the process invoking it, so
: both the 'force' and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alfred Perlstein writes:
: Unless this syscall was restricted to root, or a small subset of
: uid's it would cause some severe security issues from my point
: of view.
Even the small subset of uids would be highly suspect.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
* Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 09:16] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alfred Perlstein writes:
: Unless this syscall was restricted to root, or a small subset of
: uid's it would cause some severe security issues from my point
: of view.
Even the small subset of uids would be
12 matches
Mail list logo
