at it because the source tree is a consistently moving target.
s#moving#wreckless#
s/wreckless/reckless/.
wreckless is most certainly not true ;)
- marius -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Warner Losh said:
In message 199906102125.oaa28...@mag.ucsd.edu Bill Huey writes:
: Yeah, that's problematic and short sighted on their part. It's certainly
: not a question of expertise from what I've seen since there are very
: competent technical folks with strong acedemic CS backgrounds
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Marius Bendiksen wrote:
at it because the source tree is a consistently moving target.
s#moving#wreckless#
s/wreckless/reckless/.
wreckless is most certainly not true ;)
I hate when I make spelling errors that change the entire message. :
- bill fumerola -
Arun Sharma adsha...@home.com writes:
I'd say most of the differences are in implementation and development
methodology. Linux camp seems to be proud of breaking traditions and
concepts invented after lengthy research. I haven't seen that many
iconoclasts in my short encounter with FreeBSD.
You say that as if it's a good thing... I'd amend it to The Linux
camp seems to think it's a good idea to ignore countless man-years of
research and development in the field of OS design, and make the same
mistakes other people have made, corrected and documented years before
them. I haven't
Dag-Erling Smorgrav said:
Arun Sharma adsha...@home.com writes:
I'd say most of the differences are in implementation and development
methodology. Linux camp seems to be proud of breaking traditions and
concepts invented after lengthy research. I haven't seen that many
iconoclasts in my
At 09:43 AM 6/10/99 -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav said:
Arun Sharma adsha...@home.com writes:
I'd say most of the differences are in implementation and development
methodology. Linux camp seems to be proud of breaking traditions and
concepts invented after lengthy
In message 199906101017.daa27...@mag.ucsd.edu Bill Huey writes:
: It's a good thing because assumptions about memory useage within the kernel,
: portability abstractions, internal buffer queue overhead, etc..., need
: to reexamined to see if they are still relevant.
While it is true that one
: This is always good, assuming that this is done properly with peer review
: and that folks listen to it.
Linux isn't peer reviewed in the traditional sense of this meaning, so
your whole argument fails because of that. I'd agree if it was
entensively peer reviewed, it might be a good
In message 199906102125.oaa28...@mag.ucsd.edu Bill Huey writes:
: Yeah, that's problematic and short sighted on their part. It's certainly
: not a question of expertise from what I've seen since there are very
: competent technical folks with strong acedemic CS backgrounds hanging
: out on the
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Bill Huey wrote:
There definite technical problems with Linux, but it doesn't seem
to measure up to the level of criticism that I've seen directed
at it because the source tree is a consistently moving target.
s#moving#wreckless#
- bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.com -
* Dennis (den...@etinc.com) [990610 19:58]:
At 09:43 AM 6/10/99 -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav said:
Arun Sharma adsha...@home.com writes:
I'd say most of the differences are in implementation and development
methodology. Linux camp seems to be proud of breaking
Could one say that Linux vs. FreeBSD kernels are conceptually
different what task scheduling, queueing, interrupt handling,
driver architecture, buffer caching, vm etc. is concerned?
--
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies k...@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord
Yes, quite.
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Kukulies [SMTP:k...@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 10:59 AM
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: linux and freebsd kernels conceptually different?
Could one say that Linux vs. FreeBSD kernels
Christoph Kukulies k...@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de writes:
Comments from someone who's studied Linux for a while and has started
studying FreeBSD only recently.
Could one say that Linux vs. FreeBSD kernels are conceptually
different what task scheduling, queueing, interrupt handling
15 matches
Mail list logo
