On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full Duplex.
Cisco's can show you which
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full Duplex.
Cisco's can show you which mac-adresses are on which port. Probably
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full
I'm not sure if it shows the mac address of the cisco's port or
the actual device connected to it...
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0090.abea.3bc1 (bia
0090.abea.3bc1)
FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if it shows the mac address of the cisco's port or
the actual device connected to it...
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0090.abea.3bc1 (bia
0090.abea.3bc1)
Please read the documentation.
This is hard since the actual machines and switches are almost
6000 miles away from me and the last time I checked, it didn't come with
manuals. I know my way around the Cisco routers but the switches is still
a mystery...
All of the Cisco
Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mdoc.samples(7). Now tell me that that's not intuitive.
It would seem mdoc.samples(7) does not teach by example :)
des@des ~% man -t mdoc.samples | lpr -Plex
Usage: .Rv -std sections 2 and 3 only
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
I was checking out the firewall setup in /etc/rc.firewall, and noticed that
the simple example relied on a fixed IP address for the external interface. I
don't know ahead of time what IP address is going to
Tim Baird wrote:
I hope everyone is benefitting by these simple facts
*chuckle* "Simple facts.." You sound like my physics professor. I for one
am benefitting very much from the discussion. I got hired at my current job
as a software person, but I have a background in hardware so I
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This looks like what you are doing is trying to grab the data on the
stack before "log" which is the return address.
Yes. It actually works :)
I
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I doubt this is
at all portable and may fail because of
Just to remind everyone where the actual logic is contained...
Check out swap_pager.c line 1135 (in version $Id: vm_pageout.c,v
1.129.2.6 1999/03/18 23:28:39 julian Exp $).
FreeBSD is not 100% indiscriminant. It favors procs with PID 48 as
targets. You could tune this to discriminate against
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd?
Probably for portability.
I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
There's nothing stopping you unifdefing
The man page says the tee option on ipfw is not yet supported.
I'm wondering if that is still the case as of 3.2-stable, or if the doc is
just out of date.
I would like to make a copy of incoming UDP packets to a specific port for
some testing. tee seems like an easy way to go.
To
Has anybody done a port of glibc to FreeBSD? (I'm not interested in
opinions about how poor it is or how evil the FSF are; I'm only asking to
avoid duplicate work. Thanks.)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Jeremy writes:
: There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system. I
: have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the
: ifdef's in the main code tree.
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure that there are
no
I guess I forgot about the overhead. I've tested between two
FreeBSD machines using Intel Pro100+ NIC cards connected to a Cisco 2924XL
Switch Full Duplex and never seen anything close to the speeds.
using netperfv2pl3 and FreeBSD 2.2.8 on 300MHz PII with fxp
cards (all from
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no chance that the loader will gain the ability to
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no chance that the loader will gain the
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no
[trimming CC list]
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mdoc.samples(7). Now tell me that that's not intuitive.
It would seem mdoc.samples(7) does not teach by example :)
des@des ~% man -t mdoc.samples | lpr -Plex
Usage: .Rv -std sections 2 and 3 only
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999, Per Lundberg wrote:
Has anybody done a port of glibc to FreeBSD? (I'm not interested in
opinions about how poor it is or how evil the FSF are; I'm only asking to
avoid duplicate work. Thanks.)
Not that I know of, but what's the point?
--
|Chris Costello [EMAIL
On Saturday, 17 July 1999 at 22:51:17 +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to have a root partition on vinum'ed disk and benefit from
mirroring? If yes, how do I do it?
Not yet. It's on the drawing board.
Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
On Saturday, 17 July 1999 at 15:07:12 -0500, Craig Johnston wrote:
Well, I'm looking into doing striping and mirroring on a new webserver
I am bringing up (3.2-stable) and I have to say, vinum looks very cool.
It took me like half an hour to get it going from first contact.
Nice job Greg --
I have a test driver that returns these values from the poll() function.
However, the application
that called the select() is not getting an error. Instead, the select
is returning that the particular file descriptor is, in this case,
'readable' !
Take a look at "selscan"
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 17 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Is there any (evidently non-portable) way of determining a function
instance's return address? I have an idea or two that involves the
return address and dladdr(). The code I currently use looks like this:
This looks
Jaye Mathisen writes:
The man page says the tee option on ipfw is not yet supported.
I'm wondering if that is still the case as of 3.2-stable, or if the doc is
just out of date.
You are correct, it's still not implemented..
-Archie
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full Duplex.
Cisco's can show you which
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full Duplex.
Cisco's can show you which mac-adresses are on which port. Probably
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
Ah, you have a point there. The problem is we have so many wires,
we don't know which port goes to what on the Catalyst so we had it on
autodetect and FreeBSD does boot up with fxp0 showing 100Mbps Full
On Friday, 16 July 1999 at 19:15:31 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Actually, I was referring to *digital* Audio cables like those
:used for CD Transports to Digital/Analog convertors such as Kimber Kable
:would be higher grade compared to Monster Cable. You're correct about the
:bit
I'm not sure if it shows the mac address of the cisco's port or
the actual device connected to it...
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0090.abea.3bc1 (bia
0090.abea.3bc1)
FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999 sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I'm not sure if it shows the mac address of the cisco's port or
the actual device connected to it...
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0090.abea.3bc1 (bia
0090.abea.3bc1)
Please read the documentation.
This is hard since the actual machines and switches are almost
6000 miles away from me and the last time I checked, it didn't come with
manuals. I know my way around the Cisco routers but the switches is still
a mystery...
All of the Cisco
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
This looks like what you are doing is trying to grab the data on the
stack before log which is the return address.
Yes. It actually works :)
I doubt this is
at all portable and may fail because of
Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com writes:
mdoc.samples(7). Now tell me that that's not intuitive.
It would seem mdoc.samples(7) does not teach by example :)
d...@des ~% man -t mdoc.samples | lpr -Plex
Usage: .Rv -std sections 2 and 3 only
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
I was checking out the firewall setup in /etc/rc.firewall, and noticed that
the simple example relied on a fixed IP address for the external interface.
I
don't know ahead of time what IP address is going
Tim Baird wrote:
I hope everyone is benefitting by these simple facts
*chuckle* Simple facts.. You sound like my physics professor. I for
one
am benefitting very much from the discussion. I got hired at my current job
as a software person, but I have a background in hardware so I
Assem Salama wrote:
I am interested in helping in the development in FreeBSD. I'm not a
hotshot programmer but I know how to program. Could someone please send
me the available projects that I can work on and some info about them?
Step one, ignore all those responses to the poster
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
This looks like what you are doing is trying to grab the data on the
stack before log which is the return address.
Yes. It actually works :)
I doubt
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
I doubt this is
at all portable and may fail because of optimizations and ABI, such
as archs that store the
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Alfred Perlstein bri...@rush.net writes:
I doubt this is
at all portable and may fail because of
Just to remind everyone where the actual logic is contained...
Check out swap_pager.c line 1135 (in version $Id: vm_pageout.c,v
1.129.2.6 1999/03/18 23:28:39 julian Exp $).
FreeBSD is not 100% indiscriminant. It favors procs with PID 48 as
targets. You could tune this to discriminate against
The man page says the tee option on ipfw is not yet supported.
I'm wondering if that is still the case as of 3.2-stable, or if the doc is
just out of date.
I would like to make a copy of incoming UDP packets to a specific port for
some testing. tee seems like an easy way to go.
To
Warner Losh i...@village.org wrote:
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd?
Probably for portability.
I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
There's nothing stopping you unifdefing
Has anybody done a port of glibc to FreeBSD? (I'm not interested in
opinions about how poor it is or how evil the FSF are; I'm only asking to
avoid duplicate work. Thanks.)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
In message 99jul19.084214est.40...@border.alcanet.com.au Peter Jeremy writes:
: There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system. I
: have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the
: ifdef's in the main code tree.
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making
I guess I forgot about the overhead. I've tested between two
FreeBSD machines using Intel Pro100+ NIC cards connected to a Cisco 2924XL
Switch Full Duplex and never seen anything close to the speeds.
using netperfv2pl3 and FreeBSD 2.2.8 on 300MHz PII with fxp
cards (all from
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no chance that the loader will gain the ability to
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no chance that the loader will gain the
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
Mike Smith wrote:
The loader will, at some stage in the future, grow a persistent data
store in which items like this can be saved.
Doesn't /boot/[defaults/]loader.conf[.local] qualify as persistent
data storage?
There is little or no
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 05:44:39PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure that there are
no security implications to some of the paths, doing that would be
useless, since that wouldn't be what is checked into the system. We
really don't need the
[trimming CC list]
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com writes:
mdoc.samples(7). Now tell me that that's not intuitive.
It would seem mdoc.samples(7) does not teach by example :)
d...@des ~% man -t mdoc.samples | lpr -Plex
Usage: .Rv -std sections 2 and 3 only
This
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999, Per Lundberg wrote:
Has anybody done a port of glibc to FreeBSD? (I'm not interested in
opinions about how poor it is or how evil the FSF are; I'm only asking to
avoid duplicate work. Thanks.)
Not that I know of, but what's the point?
--
|Chris Costello
On Saturday, 17 July 1999 at 22:51:17 +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to have a root partition on vinum'ed disk and benefit from
mirroring? If yes, how do I do it?
Not yet. It's on the drawing board.
Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
On Saturday, 17 July 1999 at 15:07:12 -0500, Craig Johnston wrote:
Well, I'm looking into doing striping and mirroring on a new webserver
I am bringing up (3.2-stable) and I have to say, vinum looks very cool.
It took me like half an hour to get it going from first contact.
Nice job Greg --
I have a test driver that returns these values from the poll() function.
However, the application
that called the select() is not getting an error. Instead, the select
is returning that the particular file descriptor is, in this case,
'readable' !
Take a look at selscan
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 17 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Is there any (evidently non-portable) way of determining a function
instance's return address? I have an idea or two that involves the
return address and dladdr(). The code I currently use looks like this:
This looks
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Per Lundberg wrote:
Has anybody done a port of glibc to FreeBSD? (I'm not interested in
opinions about how poor it is or how evil the FSF are; I'm only asking to
avoid duplicate work. Thanks.)
Perhaps if you explain what it is you're trying to accomplish, there might
be
59 matches
Mail list logo
