Re: SURVEY: Sound cards that work under FreeBSD

1999-07-23 Thread Dirk GOUDERS
Here's the information about the sound card I am working with: 1) The sound card make and model/chipset. Please be as specific as you can with board rev numbers if possible. Please include wether the card is ISA or PCI. My sound card is a SBPCI128 by Creative Labs. 2) FreeBSD

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Vincent Poy
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I've had great results with the Tyan 1836DLUAN/Thunder 100's. I've got several boxes with 1GB of RAM and dual 450's humming along. For comparison one system with less memory and a

Re: usb keyboard setup -or- HELP!

1999-07-23 Thread Nick Hibma
Check out the ukbd man page man 4 ukbd It should give you all the information you need. The PS/2 connector should be recognised by the ums driver and it should give you a mouse that you can attach as described in the ums man page. Let me know if this does not work for you, so we can

Re: PAM LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too.

1999-07-23 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 10:58:59PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:59PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: PAM is also "using masses of weird shared objects" but nevertheless it's quite usable

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-23 Thread itojun
We (KAME) are using 3.2-RELEASE and 2.2.8-RELEASE because we can't base our IPv6 development on top of moving target. FreeBSD 3.x-STABLE and 4.x are moving target (which moves very quickly) and are unusable as base version for us - if we need to chase two moving

Re: InterMezzo: Project for kernel/FS hackers

1999-07-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Nik Clayton wrote: Hi chaps, Not entirely sure which list to post this too, so I figured that -hackers was probably most appropriate. Has anyone had the chance to look at InterMezzo, website at http://www.inter-mezzo.org/ It's main claim to fame is that it

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Alex Zepeda wrote ... On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a keyboard. I've seen this with both FreeBSD and NT, so I'm considering it a

Paper: Kernel-Supported Speculative Process Execution for Transparent File System Prefetching

1999-07-23 Thread Robert Watson
-- Title Kernel-Supported Speculative Process Execution for Transparent File System Prefetching CMU 15-712 Software Systems Authors Ted Pham and Robert Watson Date May 7, 1999 Abstract This paper explores the feasibility of an operating system kernel performing

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
[Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all] On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'. inetd was running as "inetd -l" and started sucking all the CPU time

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-) Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...] Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from [...] Usually syslog will give you "last message

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote: You could turn on wrapping and log them at a level at which syslog will ignore them. I'm not sure how much this would help with inetd chewing CPU time, but... If, indeed, inetd is really "chewing CPU time". Ciao, Sheldon. To

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: [Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all] On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'.

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: What does "sucking all the CPU time" mean? Does it mean that other programs

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-) Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...] Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]:

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for what you're doing in a sensible fashion. I think you're jumping to conclusions. What I'd like to see is a

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-) But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:09:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) Sorry. The machine wasn't stressed by other programs so it was "the only

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-) But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time? Yeah. What we really need to know is how many packets inetd actually received. The manpage excerpt that DES showed us

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:16:14 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for what you're doing in a sensible fashion.

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andre Albsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with: zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp Weird. Very weird. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:35:48 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andre Albsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with: zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp Weird. Very weird. Just to overcome

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andre Albsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in each direction. Same result. Weird. I'm unable to reproduce it; my test box responds to UDP queries but does

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andre Albsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in each direction. Same result. Weird.

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Adrian Filipi-Martin
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a keyboard. I've seen this with both FreeBSD and NT, so I'm

Re: Filesystem question...

1999-07-23 Thread Ronald G. Minnich
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: Are you saying that as an ordinary user I can mount something on top of /tmp, for example? If the vfs.usermount sysctl is 1, and you have appropriate access to the thing you're trying to mount (block

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
FreeBSD can wait till unified-ipv6 is made available, since: - IPv6 is not that urgent task and - it will be messy if FreeBSD integrates KAME first, then switch to unified-ipv6. Both of these remain true. I certainly see and

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
I've found the problem - it looks like a bug in the code for matching internal service names to /etc/service names. The code says: if ((bi-bi_socktype == sep-se_socktype strcmp(bi-bi_service, sep-se_service) == 0) ||

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:"David E. Cross" wrote: : : Well, I just -STABLED the server to see if it fixed it, but I was certainly : running out. the server had only 3000-ish mbuf chains, and it would go through : them all in a day. : : Well, have you tried increasing the number of available mbufs and see if :you

Re: FreeBSD: the stealth OS?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: lot of things FreeBSD is 'better' at, and a lot of those : things can easily fluctuate on a daily or weekly basis," : said Fuller, who maintains a Linux vs BSD Web page. : "Thus, any definitive narrow statement that can be made : is usually obsolete before anyone

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 09:06:01AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: There is a good chance the leakage is in nfs_serv.c, which I fixed for -current. I do not think those changes have been backported to -STABLE. julian 1999/06/30 15:05:20 PDT Modified files:(Branch:

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: : I do not think those changes have been backported to -STABLE. : :julian 1999/06/30 15:05:20 PDT : : Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_3) :sys/nfs nfs_serv.c nfs_subs.c nfs_syscalls.c : nfsm_subs.h : Log: : MFC: Bring in NFS

boot problems (fwd)

1999-07-23 Thread Andrew Willis
After the System Halted error, i get another error message. "DAC960: system BIOS fatal Error - INT 15H function 87H Copy extended Memory ) failed." -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:54:52 + (GMT) From: Andrew Willis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SURVEY: Sound cards that work under FreeBSD

1999-07-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dirk GOUDERS writes: : My sound card is a SBPCI128 by Creative Labs. Nice card... I have one too. Plays mp3 well :-). Also plays video sound well and xgalaga works with sound!... NOTE: The SBPC64 doesn't work without an external patch... Be careful. : I only

Re: FreeBSD: the stealth OS?

1999-07-23 Thread Wes Peters
Matthew Dillon wrote: : lot of things FreeBSD is 'better' at, and a lot of those : things can easily fluctuate on a daily or weekly basis," : said Fuller, who maintains a Linux vs BSD Web page. : "Thus, any definitive narrow statement that can be made : is

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Dennis
At 10:35 AM 7/23/99 -0400, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Russell L. Carter
|At 10:35 AM 7/23/99 -0400, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: |On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: | | On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: | |I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a | tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a

Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Hagerty
Greetings, I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65] malformed header from script. Bad header=Couldn't open /usr/libexec/ld.so

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Tim Tsai
blush I fried two P6 ASUS motherboards this way, sorta along these lines, "hmm, keyboard seems to be dead, maybe try it in this machine" We did the same thing on two Asus P6 MB as well! We replaced the fuse near the keyboard and both motherboards are working perfectly now. Tim To

Re: Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Osokin Sergey
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Matthew Hagerty wrote: Greetings, I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65] malformed header from

New patch fpr uipc_socket.c - any objections?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
Object now or forever hold your peace! Patch included again for reference. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: uipc_socket.c

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread David E. Cross
Well, backing out now is not really an option... But given my past history with NFS, and knowledge of this site I think I have a fair idea where the leak is... I think it is in the nfsv3 "commit" handler. Why do I think this? Simple, this problem started when a user started running a large

Re: rndcontrol and SMP

1999-07-23 Thread Ben Smithurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ! warn(""); That should (probably) be `warn(NULL);', otherwise you'd get something like `rndcontrol: : error' rather than the (probably) desired `rndcontrol: error'. (Or so my simple test showed, at least...) -- Ben Smithurst|

mbuf leakage

1999-07-23 Thread David E. Cross
Well, it doesn't appear to be commit() :(. Any-who, is there a way I can get a look at the raw mbuf/mbuf-clusters? I have a feeling that seeing the data in them would speak volumes of information. Preferably a way to see them without DDB/panic would be ideal. -- David Cross

Re: rndcontrol and SMP

1999-07-23 Thread Bruce Evans
/* * XXX the data is 16-bit due to a historical botch, so we use * magic 16's instead of ICU_LEN and can't support 24 interrupts * under SMP. */ intr = *(int16_t *)data; if (cmd != MEM_RETURNIRQ (intr 0 || intr = 16))

deny ktrace without read permissions?

1999-07-23 Thread jkoshy
PR bin/3546 asks that `ktrace(1)' not be allowed on files that do not have read permissions for the user attempting to execute them. The intent of this change is to prevent a user from seeing how an executable with '--x--x--x' perms works by ktrace'ing its execution. My question to the

Re: deny ktrace without read permissions?

1999-07-23 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 23 July 1999 at 22:12:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PR bin/3546 asks that `ktrace(1)' not be allowed on files that do not have read permissions for the user attempting to execute them. The intent of this change is to prevent a user from seeing how an executable with

Re: PAM LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too.

1999-07-23 Thread John Polstra
In article 19990722111605.c49...@palmerharvey.co.uk, Dominic Mitchell dom.mitch...@palmerharvey.co.uk wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:59PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: PAM is also using masses of weird shared objects but nevertheless it's quite usable By statically linked binaries? Our

usb keyboard setup -or- HELP!

1999-07-23 Thread Jim Bryant
hi, i'm running 4.0-current on a dual p2-333 box. i run X, and am looking for help in setting up a usb keyboard for use with FreeBSD/Xfree86. if anyone has this running, i could use the help in setting it up. also, this keyboard has a ps2 mouse connector. does the mouse get recognized as a usb

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread Doug
David E. Cross wrote: Well, I just -STABLED the server to see if it fixed it, but I was certainly running out. the server had only 3000-ish mbuf chains, and it would go through them all in a day. Well, have you tried increasing the number of available mbufs and see if you reach a

Re: PAM LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too.

1999-07-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, John Polstra wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:59PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: PAM is also using masses of weird shared objects but nevertheless it's quite usable By statically linked binaries? Our PAM implementation works for static binaries too. See the

Re: SURVEY: Sound cards that work under FreeBSD

1999-07-23 Thread Dirk GOUDERS
Here's the information about the sound card I am working with: 1) The sound card make and model/chipset. Please be as specific as you can with board rev numbers if possible. Please include wether the card is ISA or PCI. My sound card is a SBPCI128 by Creative Labs. 2) FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD: the stealth OS?

1999-07-23 Thread Nick Hibma
There's a lot of things that Linux is 'better' at, and a lot of things FreeBSD is 'better' at, and a lot of those things can easily fluctuate on a daily or weekly basis, said Fuller, who maintains a Linux vs BSD Web page. Thus, any definitive narrow statement

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Vincent Poy
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I've had great results with the Tyan 1836DLUAN/Thunder 100's. I've got several boxes with 1GB of RAM and dual 450's humming along. For comparison one system with less memory and a

Re: usb keyboard setup -or- HELP!

1999-07-23 Thread Nick Hibma
Check out the ukbd man page man 4 ukbd It should give you all the information you need. The PS/2 connector should be recognised by the ums driver and it should give you a mouse that you can attach as described in the ums man page. Let me know if this does not work for you, so we can

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-23 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* ito...@iijlab.net (ito...@iijlab.net) [990722 16:17]: Are you just teasing or are you serious? Well, according to what was discussed earlier he is serious. But from prolonged exposure to the kame lists I (think I) know that the FreeBSD ipv6 stuff is only available for 3.x and below.

Re: PAM LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too.

1999-07-23 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 10:58:59PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: In article 19990722111605.c49...@palmerharvey.co.uk, Dominic Mitchell dom.mitch...@palmerharvey.co.uk wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:59PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: PAM is also using masses of weird shared objects but

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-23 Thread itojun
We (KAME) are using 3.2-RELEASE and 2.2.8-RELEASE because we can't base our IPv6 development on top of moving target. FreeBSD 3.x-STABLE and 4.x are moving target (which moves very quickly) and are unusable as base version for us - if we need to chase two moving

Re: InterMezzo: Project for kernel/FS hackers

1999-07-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Nik Clayton wrote: Hi chaps, Not entirely sure which list to post this too, so I figured that -hackers was probably most appropriate. Has anyone had the chance to look at InterMezzo, website at http://www.inter-mezzo.org/ It's main claim to fame is that it

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Alex Zepeda wrote ... On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a keyboard. I've seen this with both FreeBSD and NT, so I'm considering it a

Paper: Kernel-Supported Speculative Process Execution for Transparent File System Prefetching

1999-07-23 Thread Robert Watson
-- Title Kernel-Supported Speculative Process Execution for Transparent File System Prefetching CMU 15-712 Software Systems Authors Ted Pham and Robert Watson Date May 7, 1999 Abstract This paper explores the feasibility of an operating system kernel performing

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
[Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all] On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'. inetd was running as inetd -l and started sucking all the CPU time even

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-) Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...] Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from [...] Usually syslog will give you last message

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote: You could turn on wrapping and log them at a level at which syslog will ignore them. I'm not sure how much this would help with inetd chewing CPU time, but... If, indeed, inetd is really chewing CPU time. Ciao, Sheldon. To

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: [Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all] On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'. inetd

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: What does sucking all the CPU time mean? Does it mean that other programs

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-) Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...] Jul 23 11:21:28 daemon.info printfix inetd[1743]:

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn sheld...@uunet.co.za writes: I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I can say is don't do that, because I can't think of a why to cater for what you're doing in a sensible fashion. I think you're jumping to conclusions. What I'd like to see is a

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-) But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:09:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) Sorry. The machine wasn't stressed by other programs so it was the only

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-) But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote: But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time? Yeah. What we really need to know is how many packets inetd actually received. The manpage excerpt that DES showed us

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:16:14 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Sheldon Hearn sheld...@uunet.co.za writes: I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I can say is don't do that, because I can't think of a why to cater for what you're doing in a sensible fashion.

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andre Albsmeier andre.albsme...@mchp.siemens.de writes: Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with: zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp Weird. Very weird. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:35:48 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andre Albsmeier andre.albsme...@mchp.siemens.de writes: Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with: zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp Weird. Very weird. Just to

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andre Albsmeier andre.albsme...@mchp.siemens.de writes: Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in each direction. Same result. Weird. I'm unable to reproduce it; my test box responds to UDP

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andre Albsmeier andre.albsme...@mchp.siemens.de writes: Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in each direction. Same

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Adrian Filipi-Martin
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a keyboard. I've seen this with both FreeBSD and NT, so I'm

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Adrian Filipi-Martin
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I've had great results with the Tyan 1836DLUAN/Thunder 100's. I've got several boxes with 1GB of RAM and dual 450's humming along.

boot problems

1999-07-23 Thread Andrew Willis
Perhaps someone can help me with this...I just bought a new computer. (2) pII 400 chips (1) Intel 1440GX (Dual CPU PIII) motherboard (2) 256 MB SDRAM (1) Mylex Raid 960 model 150 adapter (3) Quantum Atlas IV 9.1 GB Ultra2 SCSI (1) CDROM 40x (1) Floppy 1.44 (1) Server case with redundant power

Re: Filesystem question...

1999-07-23 Thread Ronald G. Minnich
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: Are you saying that as an ordinary user I can mount something on top of /tmp, for example? If the vfs.usermount sysctl is 1, and you have appropriate access to the thing you're trying to mount (block

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
FreeBSD can wait till unified-ipv6 is made available, since: - IPv6 is not that urgent task and - it will be messy if FreeBSD integrates KAME first, then switch to unified-ipv6. Both of these remain true. I certainly see and

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
I've found the problem - it looks like a bug in the code for matching internal service names to /etc/service names. The code says: if ((bi-bi_socktype == sep-se_socktype strcmp(bi-bi_service, sep-se_service) == 0) ||

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:David E. Cross wrote: : : Well, I just -STABLED the server to see if it fixed it, but I was certainly : running out. the server had only 3000-ish mbuf chains, and it would go through : them all in a day. : : Well, have you tried increasing the number of available mbufs and see if :you

Re: FreeBSD: the stealth OS?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: lot of things FreeBSD is 'better' at, and a lot of those : things can easily fluctuate on a daily or weekly basis, : said Fuller, who maintains a Linux vs BSD Web page. : Thus, any definitive narrow statement that can be made : is usually obsolete before anyone

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 09:06:01AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: There is a good chance the leakage is in nfs_serv.c, which I fixed for -current. I do not think those changes have been backported to -STABLE. julian 1999/06/30 15:05:20 PDT Modified files:(Branch:

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: : I do not think those changes have been backported to -STABLE. : :julian 1999/06/30 15:05:20 PDT : : Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_3) :sys/nfs nfs_serv.c nfs_subs.c nfs_syscalls.c : nfsm_subs.h : Log: : MFC: Bring in NFS cleanups

boot problems (fwd)

1999-07-23 Thread Andrew Willis
After the System Halted error, i get another error message. DAC960: system BIOS fatal Error - INT 15H function 87H Copy extended Memory ) failed. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:54:52 + (GMT) From: Andrew Willis awil...@omega.honk.org To:

Re: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile?

1999-07-23 Thread David E. Cross
Ok, here are some real stats w is the read-only machine, it services everything that s (the read-write machine) does... in fact it services more. *w crossd $ strings -a /kernel | grep \^___maxusers ___maxusers 96 *w crossd $ uname -a FreeBSD w.cs.rpi.edu 3.2-STABLE FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE #1:

Re: Proposed substitution for ACLs

1999-07-23 Thread John Polstra
In article 37882150.87a93...@newsguy.com, Daniel C. Sobral d...@newsguy.com wrote: Do whatever you want: as a fs layer. That would be good advice, if FS layers worked. John -- John Polstra j...@polstra.com John D. Polstra Co., Inc.

Re: Proposed substitution for ACLs

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:In article 37882150.87a93...@newsguy.com, :Daniel C. Sobral d...@newsguy.com wrote: : : Do whatever you want: as a fs layer. : :That would be good advice, if FS layers worked. : :John :-- : John Polstra j...@polstra.com : John D. Polstra Co.,

Re: SURVEY: Sound cards that work under FreeBSD

1999-07-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message 199907230710.jaa04...@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-ge.de Dirk GOUDERS writes: : My sound card is a SBPCI128 by Creative Labs. Nice card... I have one too. Plays mp3 well :-). Also plays video sound well and xgalaga works with sound!... NOTE: The SBPC64 doesn't work without an external

Re: FreeBSD: the stealth OS?

1999-07-23 Thread Wes Peters
Matthew Dillon wrote: : lot of things FreeBSD is 'better' at, and a lot of those : things can easily fluctuate on a daily or weekly basis, : said Fuller, who maintains a Linux vs BSD Web page. : Thus, any definitive narrow statement that can be made : is

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Dennis
At 10:35 AM 7/23/99 -0400, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a keyboard.

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Russell L. Carter
|At 10:35 AM 7/23/99 -0400, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: |On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: | | On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: | |I know a lot of people like the ASUS P2B boards, but I've noticed a | tendency for the systems to reset occasionally when plugging in a

Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Hagerty
Greetings, I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65] malformed header from script. Bad header=Couldn't open /usr/libexec/ld.so

Re: What good PII/PIII Motherboards for FreeBSD and Celeron CPU's

1999-07-23 Thread Tim Tsai
blush I fried two P6 ASUS motherboards this way, sorta along these lines, hmm, keyboard seems to be dead, maybe try it in this machine We did the same thing on two Asus P6 MB as well! We replaced the fuse near the keyboard and both motherboards are working perfectly now. Tim To

Re: Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Osokin Sergey
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Matthew Hagerty wrote: Greetings, I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65] malformed header from

Re: Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Mike Smith
Install the compat22 dist; you have an old a.out binary there. Greetings, I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65]

Re: Missing ld.so in 3.2?

1999-07-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Install the compat22 dist; you have an old a.out binary there. : : Greetings, : : I have a 3.2 install from CD-ROM and I am trying to run a commerical : program, i.e. I don't have the source, and it is giving me the following error: : : [Fri Jul 23 16:47:48 1999] [error] [client 216.47.238.65]

  1   2   >