Currently ports/sysutils/ipa supports IPv4/v6 Firewall and IP Filter,
so I implemented it already.
Sometime admins want to count bytes on Ethernet segment
(for example). As I know IP Firewall and IP Filter can't catch
all bytes on interface (interface is switched to promiscuous-mode).
If I'm
Dear Mahlon,
Can anyone tell me what this means - and even better, a fix? It's
my understanding that pmap concerns shared memory, is it possible
I have a bad stick of ram floating around?
Bad memory sticks are easy to find. Just rip out half the RAM and let the
box run for a few days,
Read #1, but skip the rest, it's opinion.
BSD license, right? Without disagreeing with any of the
previous points, let me step into evangelism mode here and borrow/add
my own comments. Please take replies to the evangelism list, however
(maybe post a variant of this on
8) For a firewall, ipfw blows the doors off of Linux's
iptables/ipchains/ipmasq/whatever.
If you want a stateful firewall, look at ipf (also very very
very very very nice!!!) I'm waiting for ipf to get bridging support
FreeBSD's ipfw is stafeful as well, and there are no plans
(at
Dear Andrew,
18) Ports. 'ya can't forget them.
More importantly, ports that are going to work on all free BSD's. If you
haven't been keeping track of Open Packages, those guys have put the pedal
to the metal.
Just my ramblings. I don't evangelize much, but it strikes me
as odd
When booting FreeBSD 4.x on a system board with onboard fxp ethernet we
developed for a research project here, we observe the same behaviour as
described in the Dec 2000 -hackers thread "RE: yet another unsupported
PHY in fxp driver"
David Greenman wrote:
: nope, type 0, addr 0. does this
7. FreeBSD is developed very rapidly. Especially if you subscribe to
mailing lists, you can see bugs fixed almost as soon as they are
mentioned. New features are added more conservatively, however. New
stuff is tried out in -CURRENT, where the heavy-duty FreeBSD hackers
make it stable,
hi there,
not a big pain, but rather puzzling. when i play heretic on 4.2 stable (no
sound) after i get killed couple of times and reload the previously saved
game system gets slower and slower (pIII, 128 RAM). just wandering if there
is some memory leak in heretis, since when i kill the game
Dear Peter,
not a big pain, but rather puzzling. when i play heretic on
4.2 stable (no
sound) after i get killed couple of times and reload the
previously saved
game system gets slower and slower (pIII, 128 RAM). just
wandering if there
is some memory leak in heretis, since when i
Hello,
I've got some problems with
MALLOC_DEFINE(M_DNDF, "ip_dndf", "dndf kernel aquisitions"); in my .c file
and/or
MALLOC_DECLARE(M_DNDF); in my .h
In sys/malloc.h it shows that MALLOC_DEFINE initializes the malloc_type
struct to default values.
When I know use it in my kernel code, I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
When booting FreeBSD 4.x on a system board with onboard fxp ethernet we
developed for a research project here, we observe the same behaviour as
described in the Dec 2000 -hackers thread "RE: yet another unsupported
PHY in fxp driver"
Jonathan Lemon has
In article local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
When booting FreeBSD 4.x on a system board with onboard fxp ethernet we
developed for a research project here, we observe the same behaviour as
described in the Dec 2000 -hackers thread "RE: yet another unsupported
PHY in fxp
Can anyone tell me what this means - and even better, a fix? It's
my understanding that pmap concerns shared memory, is it possible
I have a bad stick of ram floating around?
Bad memory sticks are easy to find. Just rip out half the RAM and let the
box run for a few days, then let it
A friend of mine swears by this memory testing utility:
http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/memtest86/
Apparently it tries a bunch of diffrent test patters that are likely to find
memory problems that a simple test wouldn't find. It is cool because you
just just write the image to a 1.44mb
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Joseph Gleason wrote:
:A friend of mine swears by this memory testing utility:
:
:http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/memtest86/
:
:Apparently it tries a bunch of diffrent test patters that are likely to find
:memory problems that a simple test wouldn't find. It is cool
project *
** kldload ufs ***
i feel that a real microkernel OS should'nt have a
bloated kernel in the sense, that heavy OS equipment
like a FileSystem should run as a module on top of the
kernel.
i aim to make ufs run as a module on FreeBSD, which
surely
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Aman Sharma wrote:
project *
** kldload ufs ***
i feel that a real microkernel OS should'nt have a
bloated kernel in the sense, that heavy OS equipment
like a FileSystem should run as a module on top of the
kernel.
i aim to
Hi,
I run two systems on an intranet. The intranet itself is rather large,
but the two machines in question are connected to the same 100 Mbps/FDX
switch. I would like to optimize network throughput for Machine 1.
Machine 1 is a AMD K6-2 233 w/ 64 MB RAM running FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE from
around
Try using netperf (http://www.netperf.org/) too. I've found it to be an
extremely valuable tool.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Niek Bergboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network throughput tuning
Hi,
I run two
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote:
If I were you, I'd have a look at a book named "System Performance Tuning".
I forget the author, but it's one of the Nutshell handbooks. After reading
through that you will be able to answer your own question, and know how to
20 matches
Mail list logo
