> In message
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> : You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
>
> But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
> latest C standards way to say that.
If you're that fixed on portability, "%lux%08ulx", (long)foo>>32,
(long)foo is alwa
In message "Brian
F. Feldman" writes:
: Sorry, kinda used to quad rather than long long. I'm pretty sure ll
: isn't yet supported by the kernel printf functions...
You may be right about that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the
On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> : You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
>
> But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
> latest C standards way to say that.
Sorry, kinda used to quad rather than long long. I
In message "Brian
F. Feldman" writes:
: You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
latest C standards way to say that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the
In message Bill
Fumerola writes:
: cvsup seems to set the wrong attributes after I've forced them to work
: that way.
I see this when I cvsup as root too (although the file you quoted
should be r--r--r--. I can't get the modes on the directories to be
775...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Don Lewis wrote:
> Why not off_t, which should be portable and scale properly with the
> maximum system file size. Then the only problem is figuring a portable
> means of printing the result ...
sizeof() perhaps?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
w
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to make a cvs archive work for users that aren't
> the owner of the archive, the way that it works on Freefall? I *am*
> doing this for a cvsup maintained FreeBSD archive, but not freefall, and
> I need to get one user, who is not t
Does anyone have a copy of Andrew McRae's Usenix 93 paper ?
The URL: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/amcrae/hardprof.PS doesn't
seem to be valid any more.
Thanks!
-Arun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Saturday, 7 August 1999 at 1:06:51 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> Does anyone have a copy of Andrew McRae's Usenix 93 paper ?
>
> The URL: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/amcrae/hardprof.PS doesn't
> seem to be valid any more.
On Saturday, 7 August 1999 at 16:27:39 +1000, Andrew McRae wrote:
>> On Saturda
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
>Feldman" writes:
> : You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
>
> But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
> latest C standards way to say that.
If you're that fixed on portability, "%lux%08ulx", (long)foo>>32,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: Sorry, kinda used to quad rather than long long. I'm pretty sure ll
: isn't yet supported by the kernel printf functions...
You may be right about that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
>Feldman" writes:
> : You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
>
> But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
> latest C standards way to say that.
Sorry, kinda used to quad rathe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo.
But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the
latest C standards way to say that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Don Lewis wrote:
> On Aug 6, 3:29pm, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> } Subject: quad_t and portability
> }
> } Hi folks,
> }
> } I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
> } necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
> } more
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill
Fumerola writes:
: cvsup seems to set the wrong attributes after I've forced them to work
: that way.
I see this when I cvsup as root too (although the file you quoted
should be r--r--r--. I can't get the modes on the directories to be
775...
Warner
To Uns
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Don Lewis wrote:
> Why not off_t, which should be portable and scale properly with the
> maximum system file size. Then the only problem is figuring a portable
> means of printing the result ...
sizeof() perhaps?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to make a cvs archive work for users that aren't
> the owner of the archive, the way that it works on Freefall? I *am*
> doing this for a cvsup maintained FreeBSD archive, but not freefall, and
> I need to get one user, who is not
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199908061100.haa16...@smtp1.erols.com> John Baldwin writes:
> : Perhapas have a group that has write access to all the archive and stick the
> : user in that group? That doesn't prevent checkins, however.
>
> You can do that inside the resposi
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 12:46:05PM +1000, Chris wrote:
>
> > The issue is not speed, because this is something we do in the
> > background when there's nothing else to do. The issue is to avoid
> > thrashing the cache.
[...]
> Two things,
You haven't considered SMP yet.
--
This is my .signatur
In message <37ab8b48.4a791...@tig.com.au> Chris writes:
: As always when a misconfiguration (read 'not to spec') is used enough
: then it quickly becomes somewhat of a de facto standard.
I'd love to see chapter and verse on this :-)
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
In message <199908061100.haa16...@smtp1.erols.com> John Baldwin writes:
: Perhapas have a group that has write access to all the archive and stick the
: user in that group? That doesn't prevent checkins, however.
You can do that inside the respository itself. Just try to do a
commit on your loca
Does anyone have a copy of Andrew McRae's Usenix 93 paper ?
The URL: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/amcrae/hardprof.PS doesn't
seem to be valid any more.
Thanks!
-Arun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message
"Brian
F. Feldman" writes:
: Since it was made to work? The problem here is that this person, for some
: reason, is misconfiguring their system and expecting it to work as if it
: were configured properly.
Odd, all of the machines that I've seen shipped lately have their
CDROMs on a s
In message <001201bedfb8$92fa3440$88291...@wipro.tcpn.com> "Biju Susmer" writes:
: I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this
: configuration without any problem, why FBSD should refuse this configuration?
: When i was using 2.2.7-stable, FBSD used to recognize my CDRO
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Don Lewis wrote:
> On Aug 6, 3:29pm, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> } Subject: quad_t and portability
> }
> } Hi folks,
> }
> } I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
> } necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
> } mor
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes:
> : Perhapas have a group that has write access to all the archive and stick the
> : user in that group? That doesn't prevent checkins, however.
>
> You can do that inside the respository itself. Just
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 12:46:05PM +1000, Chris wrote:
>
> > The issue is not speed, because this is something we do in the
> > background when there's nothing else to do. The issue is to avoid
> > thrashing the cache.
[...]
> Two things,
You haven't considered SMP yet.
--
This is my .signatu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris writes:
: As always when a misconfiguration (read 'not to spec') is used enough
: then it quickly becomes somewhat of a de facto standard.
I'd love to see chapter and verse on this :-)
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes:
: Perhapas have a group that has write access to all the archive and stick the
: user in that group? That doesn't prevent checkins, however.
You can do that inside the respository itself. Just try to do a
commit on your local mirror of the Fre
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian
F. Feldman" writes:
: Since it was made to work? The problem here is that this person, for some
: reason, is misconfiguring their system and expecting it to work as if it
: were configured properly.
Odd, all of the machines that I've seen shipped lately have
In message <001201bedfb8$92fa3440$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Biju Susmer" writes:
: I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this
: configuration without any problem, why FBSD should refuse this configuration?
: When i was using 2.2.7-stable, FBSD used to recognize my CDROM *so
You can find out a bit by reading www.daemonnews.org/199907/bochs.html,
an interview with the initiator of the projct.
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Donald Burr wrote:
> What is FreeMWare? It sounds like a free / Open source implementation of
> the VMware virtual machine. Do you have an URL that
You can find out a bit by reading www.daemonnews.org/199907/bochs.html,
an interview with the initiator of the projct.
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Donald Burr wrote:
> What is FreeMWare? It sounds like a free / Open source implementation of
> the VMware virtual machine. Do you have an URL tha
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Chris writes:
> > Anyways thats all I can think of. The only way I can see that using DMA
> > to refresh pages as a faster method is if the DMA controller can do it
> > quicker than the CPU which I doubt is likely, also it will only be
> > useful if it can do 32-bi
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyways thats all I can think of. The only way I can see that using DMA
> > to refresh pages as a faster method is if the DMA controller can do it
> > quicker than the CPU which I doubt is likely, also it will only be
> > usefu
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Biju Susmer wrote:
> >
> > > Regardless, you have to have 1 master and 0 or 1 slaves one every IDE
> > > controller. You can't run a controller with just a slave.
> > >
> > I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this
> > configuration without any
[ VMWare ]
> what's needed is customer presence.
If people could send me an email address where I could send and state my
interest in a VMWare port for FreeBSD (I would of course pay for a copy
of VMWare if it existed), I'll do it.
The stuff on the WWW page is too 'generic', and I'd rather get i
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Biju Susmer wrote:
> >
> > > Regardless, you have to have 1 master and 0 or 1 slaves one every IDE
> > > controller. You can't run a controller with just a slave.
> > >
> > I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this
> > configuration without an
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> I have no idea how much of the FreeBSD code would actually build on
> a K&R compiler.
Thanks to Bruce, a lot of it.
--
- bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfume...@computerhorizons.com - bi...
On Aug 6, 3:29pm, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
} Subject: quad_t and portability
}
} Hi folks,
}
} I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
} necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
} more than 4GB of data.
Why not off_t, which should be por
> [ Moving this to -advocacy, since this is more an appropriate topic for
> them. Please direct your replies to -advocacy. ]
>
> I wonder if VMware will have a booth at LinuxWorld Expo? Perhaps it would
> behoove anyone who happens to be in the area to drop by and have a talk
> with the folks at
[ VMWare ]
> what's needed is customer presence.
If people could send me an email address where I could send and state my
interest in a VMWare port for FreeBSD (I would of course pay for a copy
of VMWare if it existed), I'll do it.
The stuff on the WWW page is too 'generic', and I'd rather get
[ Moving this to -advocacy, since this is more an appropriate topic for
them. Please direct your replies to -advocacy. ]
I wonder if VMware will have a booth at LinuxWorld Expo? Perhaps it would
behoove anyone who happens to be in the area to drop by and have a talk
with the folks at the VMware
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Donald Burr wrote:
> I don't know about you, but I for one am ready and willing to plunk down
> my hard-earned $$$ for VMware if it came to FreeBSD.
Sorry I wasn't more clear. I am too, and I'd *really* like to see
it happen. There is stuff both at work and at home tha
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> I have no idea how much of the FreeBSD code would actually build on
> a K&R compiler.
Thanks to Bruce, a lot of it.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 6, 3:29pm, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
} Subject: quad_t and portability
}
} Hi folks,
}
} I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
} necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
} more than 4GB of data.
Why not off_t, which should be po
> [ Moving this to -advocacy, since this is more an appropriate topic for
> them. Please direct your replies to -advocacy. ]
>
> I wonder if VMware will have a booth at LinuxWorld Expo? Perhaps it would
> behoove anyone who happens to be in the area to drop by and have a talk
> with the folks a
[ Moving this to -advocacy, since this is more an appropriate topic for
them. Please direct your replies to -advocacy. ]
I wonder if VMware will have a booth at LinuxWorld Expo? Perhaps it would
behoove anyone who happens to be in the area to drop by and have a talk
with the folks at the VMware
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Donald Burr wrote:
> I don't know about you, but I for one am ready and willing to plunk down
> my hard-earned $$$ for VMware if it came to FreeBSD.
Sorry I wasn't more clear. I am too, and I'd *really* like to see
it happen. There is stuff both at work and at home th
Hi,
I posted that to 'questions', but got no reply.
I wouldn't like to get 'hackers' bored, but I think this port is
important for many of us (until win exists :).
I tried to tune the 'smb.conf', but couldn't raise the write speed
even a bit.
I only like to know is there something in the kernel ca
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 06:33:30PM -0400, Marc Tardif wrote:
> If anyone could point me in the right direction, and maybe even show me
> how I could've found the answer myself, I'd appreciate.
It's defined in /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h, among other places.
I found it with:
cd /usr/include
find .
I don't know about you, but I for one am ready and willing to plunk down
my hard-earned $$$ for VMware if it came to FreeBSD. Hell, I am even
considering buying it for Linux right now. If they offer some sort of
super fabulous deal at LinuxWorld Expo, I might just do that. But even if
I do end u
Marc Tardif writes:
> At first, I simply considered the "__P" as a syntax convention. But, then
> again, this kind of syntax has to be defined somewhere. I've looked all
> over the place but can't seem to put the finger on the source of this
> syntax.
It's in :
#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(_
While slowly reading the FreeBSD source code, I noticed odd prototype
declarations which I haven't seen before. It looks something like this:
int function __P((int));
or
static int function __P((struct some_struct *some_pointer));
or anything similar.
At first, I simply considered the "__P" as a s
Hi,
I posted that to 'questions', but got no reply.
I wouldn't like to get 'hackers' bored, but I think this port is
important for many of us (until win exists :).
I tried to tune the 'smb.conf', but couldn't raise the write speed
even a bit.
I only like to know is there something in the kernel c
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 06:33:30PM -0400, Marc Tardif wrote:
> If anyone could point me in the right direction, and maybe even show me
> how I could've found the answer myself, I'd appreciate.
It's defined in /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h, among other places.
I found it with:
cd /usr/include
find .
I don't know about you, but I for one am ready and willing to plunk down
my hard-earned $$$ for VMware if it came to FreeBSD. Hell, I am even
considering buying it for Linux right now. If they offer some sort of
super fabulous deal at LinuxWorld Expo, I might just do that. But even if
I do end
Marc Tardif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At first, I simply considered the "__P" as a syntax convention. But, then
> again, this kind of syntax has to be defined somewhere. I've looked all
> over the place but can't seem to put the finger on the source of this
> syntax.
It's in :
#if defined(__
While slowly reading the FreeBSD source code, I noticed odd prototype
declarations which I haven't seen before. It looks something like this:
int function __P((int));
or
static int function __P((struct some_struct *some_pointer));
or anything similar.
At first, I simply considered the "__P" as a
Hello,
I am working on an embedded server, and have run into some
difficulty. I need to access the keyboard (to read keys) on a machine
that has no video. (no video card, that is)
I wrote a program that works fine when run from the shell prompt
(working with stdin)... but thi
Hello,
I am working on an embedded server, and have run into some
difficulty. I need to access the keyboard (to read keys) on a machine
that has no video. (no video card, that is)
I wrote a program that works fine when run from the shell prompt
(working with stdin)... but th
In FreeBSD new-bus architecture, all devices are linked into a device
tree. The root of the tree is root_bus, it has a child called nexus0 added
during the device configuration phase. I have two questions about this
new-bus code:
(1) What is the usage of this "nexus0" device? Its parent (root_b
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, James Howard wrote:
> Yeah I know, it is just easier to download those chunks over the T1 than
> it is over a 28.8. Which is what I was refering too :)
Unless you've actually tried this on a Mac, you have no idea how much of
an understatement this actually is.
- alex
You b
In FreeBSD new-bus architecture, all devices are linked into a device
tree. The root of the tree is root_bus, it has a child called nexus0 added
during the device configuration phase. I have two questions about this
new-bus code:
(1) What is the usage of this "nexus0" device? Its parent (root_
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> Ehm, this isn't possible in the same way that it is w/ FreeBSD.
> Basically, you need to grab the booter, the installer, and mkfs (all
> MacOS programs), then download the appropiate kernel, base distrib, and
> etc distrib. Not quite as slick, but it works
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, James Howard wrote:
> I realize this. The comment stems from the fact the guy I am doing this
> for would prefer FreeBSD for his Macs if the opportunity arose. I think
> I'll bring it into work on Monday and install NetBSD over the net then.
Ehm, this isn't possible in the s
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 john_wilson...@excite.com wrote:
> This is kinda different from what the original poster received.
> Keep badgering!
But ONLY if you ARE willing to pay for it if they make one. We
don't need a repeat of the CDE debacle.
Doug
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thank you for the in
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, James Howard wrote:
> Yeah I know, it is just easier to download those chunks over the T1 than
> it is over a 28.8. Which is what I was refering too :)
Unless you've actually tried this on a Mac, you have no idea how much of
an understatement this actually is.
- alex
You
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> Ehm, this isn't possible in the same way that it is w/ FreeBSD.
> Basically, you need to grab the booter, the installer, and mkfs (all
> MacOS programs), then download the appropiate kernel, base distrib, and
> etc distrib. Not quite as slick, but it work
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, James Howard wrote:
> I realize this. The comment stems from the fact the guy I am doing this
> for would prefer FreeBSD for his Macs if the opportunity arose. I think
> I'll bring it into work on Monday and install NetBSD over the net then.
Ehm, this isn't possible in the
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is kinda different from what the original poster received.
> Keep badgering!
But ONLY if you ARE willing to pay for it if they make one. We
don't need a repeat of the CDE debacle.
Doug
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thank you for the interest
What is the approved method for getting ahold of 64 clean bits? I've
been using the GNU/c9x "unsigned long long" and #ifdef-ing all over
the place but this strikes me as substantially less than elegant.
Once we have the bits, what is the Right Way to get them into
network order?
> -Original M
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> >
> > I wonder if so much assembly code is really necessary for FreeBSD. One
> > argument for minimal usage of assembly code is that it is easier to code
> > non trivial algorithms in C.
> >
> > One such example is the scheduler. Since the decision about which process
> > is
What is the approved method for getting ahold of 64 clean bits? I've
been using the GNU/c9x "unsigned long long" and #ifdef-ing all over
the place but this strikes me as substantially less than elegant.
Once we have the bits, what is the Right Way to get them into
network order?
> -Original
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> >
> > I wonder if so much assembly code is really necessary for FreeBSD. One
> > argument for minimal usage of assembly code is that it is easier to code
> > non trivial algorithms in C.
> >
> > One such example is the scheduler. Since the decision about which process
> > is
Matthew Dillon writes:
> I think we basically have two choices:
>
> * Pass the sizeof(struct) as part of the system call. Please, not as
> part of the structure! That would make this syscall the odd-man-out
> compared to all the other syscalls that take size arguments.
>
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999 15:29:25 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
> necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
> more than 4GB of data.
Yes yes, before you jump on my head, I meant u_quad_t. :-)
Ciao,
Hi folks,
I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
more than 4GB of data.
The changes made to NetBSD to support this are conditional on NO_QUAD
being undefined. Do I need to worry about this? Is
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we basically have two choices:
>
> * Pass the sizeof(struct) as part of the system call. Please, not as
> part of the structure! That would make this syscall the odd-man-out
> compared to all the other syscalls that take
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999 15:29:25 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
> necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
> more than 4GB of data.
Yes yes, before you jump on my head, I meant u_quad_t. :-)
Ciao,
Hi folks,
I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is
necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing
more than 4GB of data.
The changes made to NetBSD to support this are conditional on NO_QUAD
being undefined. Do I need to worry about this? I
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> I've researched this guy a bit more, and I have to say I think it was a
> hoax.
What a disappointment. It would have been nice to see it running on the
Mac68k (or any other older platform, 8086? :).
> Uh, MacBSD is actually pretty nice. Alan Briggs and
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> I've researched this guy a bit more, and I have to say I think it was a
> hoax.
What a disappointment. It would have been nice to see it running on the
Mac68k (or any other older platform, 8086? :).
> Uh, MacBSD is actually pretty nice. Alan Briggs an
On 06-Aug-99 Chuck Robey wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to make a cvs archive work for users that aren't
> the owner of the archive, the way that it works on Freefall? I *am*
> doing this for a cvsup maintained FreeBSD archive, but not freefall, and
> I need to get one user, who is not the arch
On 06-Aug-99 Chuck Robey wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to make a cvs archive work for users that aren't
> the owner of the archive, the way that it works on Freefall? I *am*
> doing this for a cvsup maintained FreeBSD archive, but not freefall, and
> I need to get one user, who is not the arc
This is kinda different from what the original poster received.
Keep badgering!
John
> From: Mehrdad Amir
> To: john_wilson...@excite.com
> Cc: tech_i...@vmware.com
> Subject: Re: vmware on freebsd
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:23:31 -0700
> Message-ID: <37a1c373.49578...@vmware.com>
>
> Hi John
Doug writes:
> Also, the 'boolean' option is essentially undocumented in the
> login.conf man page. It's mentioned once, but there is no example of how
> it works or the fact that the @ sign is the symbol for it. The info is in
> login_cap(3), but it's hard to decipher for a non-programmer.
This is kinda different from what the original poster received.
Keep badgering!
John
> From: Mehrdad Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: vmware on freebsd
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:23:31 -0700
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi John,
Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, the 'boolean' option is essentially undocumented in the
> login.conf man page. It's mentioned once, but there is no example of how
> it works or the fact that the @ sign is the symbol for it. The info is in
> login_cap(3), but it's hard to decipher fo
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 04-Aug-99 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > I kinda like the second choice the best but the first choice is what
> > most
> > other system calls use.
>
> That doesn't make it right =)
>
> The second avoids the 'the data is different but the s
"Daniel O'Connor" writes:
> Speaking of fetch features.. Are there any plans to make fetch use a
> http proxy for ftp requests like ftp does?
Yes. I intend to implement this in libfetch when I get around to
rewriting the HTTP code.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubs
>
> I wonder if so much assembly code is really necessary for FreeBSD. One
> argument for minimal usage of assembly code is that it is easier to code
> non trivial algorithms in C.
>
> One such example is the scheduler. Since the decision about which process
> is going to run next is decided in a
It seems Biju Susmer wrote:
> > OK, i went to net and got this page
> > (http://www.mit.edu/afs/sipb.mit.edu/project/linux/docs/faq/AT
> > API-FAQ) there
> > also they say it should be MASTER. Problem is not with me.
> > The vendor didn't
> > follow the specs. PC never followd specs i think ;)
> >
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 04-Aug-99 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > I kinda like the second choice the best but the first choice is what
> > most
> > other system calls use.
>
> That doesn't make it right =)
>
> The second avoids the 'the data is different but the
94 matches
Mail list logo
