In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey
writes:
: Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
: handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
OI_add_event(3OI) :-)
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Polstra
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 1:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gas pseudo-ops
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Stephane E. Potvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey
writes:
: Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
: handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
OI_add_event(3OI) :-)
Uhhh? I've long since got the answer I wanted, but this
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 01:07:29AM -0500, Wes Peters wrote:
As far as the FA410 goes, you might try some permutation of "ed". Their
datasheet on the website is singularly unhelpful:
http://www.netgearinc.com/products/ds_fa410tx/index.shtml
You're right, there's no information there.
Guy Middleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 01:07:29AM -0500, Wes Peters wrote:
As far as the FA410 goes, you might try some permutation of "ed". Their
datasheet on the website is singularly unhelpful:
http://www.netgearinc.com/products/ds_fa410tx/index.shtml
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey writes:
: Uhhh? I've long since got the answer I wanted, but this seems a complete
: mystery, so I'll bite, what's a OI_add_event? From some package? Can't
: find a man page on it.
OI was a native C++ toolkit that had a nice interface and was ported
to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey
writes:
: Uhhh? I've long since got the answer I wanted, but this seems a complete
: mystery, so I'll bite, what's a OI_add_event? From some package? Can't
: find a man page on it.
OI was a native C++ toolkit that had a nice interface and was
(Warning: Unrelated to FreeBSD except for the fact that FreeBSD-current
and recent -stable traceroute supports the -P option.)
I need to find out if IP protocol 50 (used by IPSec) is being blocked on
the way from Hong Kong to a customer of Telia in Norway. Could somebody
in or near Hong Kong,
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 November 1999 at 17:10:41 -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
It is said that the granularity of disk I/O is a sector. I read a little
bit of the source code isa/wd.c, which I think is the driver of IDE disks.
I find out that the disk can
Robert Swindells wrote:
Guy Middleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 01:07:29AM -0500, Wes Peters wrote:
As far as the FA410 goes, you might try some permutation of "ed". Their
datasheet on the website is singularly unhelpful:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:- Outgoing ping, telnet, ssh, http, all work, but incoming does not.
:- When I try a different pccard ethernet (an NE4100, which also uses the
:- "ed" driver), everything works fine, so the problem seems to be with
:- the card.
I don't think so. I've had lots of
From the system's point of view, there is no difference in reliability
between doing a single sector transfer and a multi-sector transfer
except for the size of the retry. Since retries do not occur very often
nobody really cares how big the retry is. Since there is a huge
I was wondering if I could get some help.
I am running a FreeBSD 2.2.8 machine configured as a nfs server.
We are trying to get another machine running 2.2.8 to mount from the nfs
server. Our challenge is that we are using a virtual ip and would
like to mount the virtual ip. We are already doing
:Thanks. It seems to me that for a filesystem, a block (or a fragment) is
:the unit of I/O. Even if a single byte is modified, an entire block
:probably consisting of multiple sectors must be written back to the disk.
:As you said, there is no differnce whether we write this block one sector
:at
Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
not an option I have time to explore.
--
---
Ron Rosson ... and
:Thanks. It seems to me that for a filesystem, a block (or a fragment) is
:the unit of I/O. Even if a single byte is modified, an entire block
:probably consisting of multiple sectors must be written back to the disk.
:As you said, there is no differnce whether we write this block one sector
http://www.intel.com/support/network/adapter/1000/30363.htm
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Voice: +780 413 1910 Fax: +780 421 4929
#575 Sun Life Place * 10123 99 Street * Edmonton, AB * Canada * T5J 3H1
----
When things
Yes, we know.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Matthew Jacob writes:
Yes, we know.
and PLEASE only send the URL in future ! I do not appreciate getting
mails which cause my MUA (exmh) to dial out to grab some goddamned
crap off the web. If I want to look at the URL, I will.
---
Gary Jennejohn
Home - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work - [EMAIL
Dear gentleman,
i have been using free for the last 12 months! I have never done
anything in terms of system development, so i decide it was the time to
get more involved with FBSD development. In repect to this regard, i
sent a mail to Mr. David Greenman, whose response was:
"The first step is
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 10:42:28AM -0500, Robert Swindells wrote:
It is listed as a supported card in PAO.
I have one as well but never got it to work. I haven't tried PAO yet
as I have got a spare 3COM card, but it would be nice to be able to
run at 100Mbps.
I just installed PAO, and it
Hello,
We are thinking of getting new servers for our lab, and run FreeBSD on it.
What kind of servers should we get, which will not cause too much
headache, ie. can work reliablely? Any suggestion will be greatly
appreciated!
Cheers,
-chen
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
:Thanks. It
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
Hello list!
I'm starting with aio functions (aio_read, aio_return, etc.), I've made them
work with disk file I/O, now I'm trying with TCP sockets not with the same
success. Does anyone know if it is posible to do what I'm trying? Or where
Matthew Jacob wrote:
Yes, we know.
Gee, the license terms look AWFULLY familiar. I'd like to think I had
some long-lasting effect on the Intel legal department, but I doubt this
was it. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
I might suggest that development in FreeBSD has many faces..
those who go through the man pages and check that they accuratly describe
the programs are as important as those who write new drivers.
You could find some part of FreeBSD that has always annoyed you and decide
to fix it.. this is how
Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
not an option I have time to explore.
If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediately
On Thu, 04 Nov 1999, Mark Newton was heard blurting out:
Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
not an option I have time to explore.
If
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Christopher Sedore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a set of patches that fix this and the fact that signals don't
get issued for completion on certain types of requests. I'm hoping to get
it committed, but feel free to contact me for the latest stuff until
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 1999, Mark Newton was heard blurting out:
If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediately
before your upgrade, and reversing the upgrade will be a simple matter
of restoring your backups.
Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
not an option I have time to explore.
If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediately
before your upgrade,
I wrote kstat as a way to improve on the current BSD method of getting
kernel statistics, which involves looking up a particular kernel symbol
name and then getting the value from the symbol offset. This makes any
performance monitoring tool or an application that gets kernel stats
non-portable
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
A user program makes a system call with this string "cpu.system" to get
the current value of user/system/nice time etc.
How is this different from doing:
# sysctl -a | grep load
vm.loadavg: { 0.15 0.09 0.04 }
Ideally we could have a syscall that could
32 matches
Mail list logo
