I guess it might be useful to see the difference between
"true" idle time and time the system couldn't do anything
useful because it was blocked on the disk (but /should/
have done something useful...).
You mean because the programmer didn't interleave their I/O,
and wrote to a
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 06:02:22PM +0100, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001115 06:19] wrote:
As far as I can see, FreeBSD (nor any other Unix system I'm aware
of) does not provide a way to do
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
of the 2 techniques ?
And what's the pro's and con's for the 2 methods ???
---
Hi hackers,
Has anyone been able to run the latest GGI stuff on a stable box?
The port graphics/libggi is outdated. The problem seems to be when
the execution enters the X library...
There package is really easy-to-compile. Any X advanced user to give
it a try?
(gdb) core-file lt-demo.core
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10
clients)
Is it using pthread and a thread per connection .
That is probably simplest from a programming point of view.
That's sounds fine to me.. :o)
Or
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote:
Modern bloat-ware really pisses me off; I built the bind
library the other day: the frigging thing was 4M, unstripped.
How does this affect the (non?-)usefullness of the
%iowait statistic?
When you are waiting for I/O in a well written
Hi,
During make install world, I keep having it stop complaining "xxx Directory:
Not Found"
If i manually create this directorys with mkdir, and re-run make install world,
it works fine, but then stops when it cant find a different directory.
Is their any way I can have make install world or
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
of the 2 techniques ?
And
Hi
Are you actually using
#make install world
???
I think you want
#make installworld
after you succesfully build the world using
#make buildworld
/Johan K
At Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:18:40 GMT, Jamie Heckford wrote:
Hi,
During make install world, I keep having it stop complaining "xxx
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Nicolai Petri wrote:
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
of the 2
Is there a FreeBSD 5.0 Stable or is there only a current
and stable reserved for the current release version (4.X).
Thanks,
-
Daryl Chance | And which parallel universe did
ValueData, LLC | YOU crawl out of?
Memphis, TN| - http://www.thinkgeek.com
- Original Message
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jasone/kse/
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, frank xu wrote:
I heard rumor that Thomas E. Anderson's Scheduler Activations theory will
be implemented in FreeBSD 5.0 kernel, is it true?
Regards,
XuYifeng
Hi,
I have an onboard sound card, and am trying to get it to work with FreeBSD.
At boot, I have the following message:
chip1: Intel 82801AA (ICH) AC'97 Audio Controller port 0xdc00-0xdc3f,0xd800-0x
d8ff irq 5 at device 31.5 on pci0
And in my Kernel:
# Sound
device pcm
This does
http://www.katsurajima.seya.yokohama.jp/ich/
Have fun. It works fine for me!
--
Dimitar Peikov
Programmer Analyst
"We Build e-Business"
RILA Solutions
27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str.
1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
home: (+359 2) 595495
phone: (+359 2) 9797320
phone: (+359 2) 9797300
fax:
In message 001d01c04fdc$9e2e2e80$020a@mike "Daryl Chance" writes:
: Is there a FreeBSD 5.0 Stable or is there only a current
: and stable reserved for the current release version (4.X).
STABLE is reserved for those branches that have had a release on
them. Since there's been no 5.0 release
frank xu wrote:
I heard rumor that Thomas E. Anderson's Scheduler Activations theory will
be implemented in FreeBSD 5.0 kernel, is it true?
Basically the coming FreeBSD threading system will be based on the work
by
Anderson. It may have some different aspects too.
I see someone already sent
majflt doesn't increase when a process is generating page faults. Instead,
the swapper process (pid 0) gets all the page faults and it is the same as
the page faults given by cnt in vmmeter.c. Why is this happening? Is
there a way to get the number of page faults generated by a SINGLE
Hello
I want you to ask a favor.
I'm incorporating the Real Time Transport Protocol(RTP) to FreeBSD
Kernel.
I want use the RTP Library API developed by Lucent
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/rtplib/rtplib-1.0a1/rtp_api.html
First, I want try if this API can be add to Kernel as system calls.
Hi,
I tried to get my onboard intel AC'97 card to work, and used a third party
driver to get success (written by Katsurajima Naoto)
The following card is:
pcm0: Intel 82801AA AC'97 audio port 0xdc00-0xdc3f,0xd800-0xd8ff irq 5 at
device 31.5 on pci0
This wasn't supported by FreeBSD first off,
Does anyone remember the article in Phrack, issue 53 I think, about
speaking Forth to a Sun's boot-prom in order to write a '0' into the UID
member of one's shell's struct proc?
--
Ben
220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, void wrote:
:Does anyone remember the article in Phrack, issue 53 I think, about
:speaking Forth to a Sun's boot-prom in order to write a '0' into the UID
:member of one's shell's struct proc?
Yes. It works a treat. Similar steps let you do the same thing with DDB
or
* Nicolai Petri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001116 02:37] wrote:
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
of the 2 techniques ?
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
Dear Bill, others,
I've been working on getting my Deskpros to use their NIC under 4.2, but no
luck. The problem is as follows: I installed 4.0, and the NIC came up under
the lnc driver, reports its MAC address and works fine.
[...]
How would i go about changing the resolution of my vt??
Im fed up with the 320 x X mode it uses, and want to maybe get it up to
1024x768.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks,
--
Jamie Heckford
Chief Network Engineer
Psi-Domain - Innovative Linux Solutions. Ask Us How.
In the last episode (Nov 16), Jamie Heckford said:
How would i go about changing the resolution of my vt??
Im fed up with the 320 x X mode it uses, and want to maybe get it up to
1024x768.
Console screens aren't pixel-based; they're character-cell based. The
default console is 80x25, which
"Yonny Cardenas B." wrote:
I have some questions:
1) Can I call functions level's user into kernel, as socket() or
calloc() ?
No.
2) How must I use the global variable "errno" for value
returned for system calls ? Is sufficient with #include sys/errno.h ?
You are not calling system
ppp will run programs as the user id that invoked ppp rather than
using the effective user id (ie, it runs things as *you*, not *root*).
Mmm-mmh. In my case, since ppp is started at boot time, the only user that
ever invokes it is root, hence the tcpmssd thingy is run as root. As
Very sorry for posting such a dumb question, but since I cvs'upd something
weird seems to have happened.
I am using this to compile my X app (which just uses Xlib.h at the mo)
gcc -L/usr/X11R6/include -o test test.cc
but it cannot locate Xlib.h?!!
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
--
Jamie Heckford
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:47:51PM +, Jamie Heckford wrote:
Very sorry for posting such a dumb question, but since I cvs'upd something
weird seems to have happened.
I am using this to compile my X app (which just uses Xlib.h at the mo)
gcc -L/usr/X11R6/include -o test test.cc
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Jamie Heckford wrote:
Very sorry for posting such a dumb question, but since I cvs'upd something
weird seems to have happened.
I am using this to compile my X app (which just uses Xlib.h at the mo)
gcc -L/usr/X11R6/include -o test test.cc
but it cannot locate
What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
of the 2 techniques ?
And what's the pro's and con's for the 2 methods ???
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote:
Ummm, how about a situation where you have a steadily
increasing work load (more customers?) and want to have
decent statistics of your servers to determine exactly
what parts to upgrade and/or if you need to put extra
machines into service?
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Bakul Shah wrote:
-The simplest solution is to just fork a new process on
-accepting a new connection. A sample implementation is
why not just bind to the port and then spawn off some processes (like 20
in his case) to do the accept(), once the accept() returns
why not just bind to the port and then spawn off some processes (like 20
in his case) to do the accept(), once the accept() returns successfully just
take care of the request, close the connection and then goes back
to accept(). Simple, easy, and even scales pretty well. Since
it's
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Bakul Shah wrote:
-Yes, this is definitely simpler and preferable when servicing
-a small number of concurrent requests. But you have to spawn
-off as many processes as the worst case number of concurrent
-requests you want to service since while all the processes
-are
* FengYue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001116 16:15] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Bakul Shah wrote:
-Yes, this is definitely simpler and preferable when servicing
-a small number of concurrent requests. But you have to spawn
-off as many processes as the worst case number of concurrent
-requests
Hi,
While implementing a module based on /usr/share/examples/cdev???
I noticed that after loading it I get a warning that originates from
kern/kern_linker.c telling me that I'm using the old kld style. [This all
on -CURRENT]
Can you please point me to the right direction for the "new" style. Or
Paonia Ezrine wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 16:32:49 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
I am looking for info on programing in kernel land. System calls, howto's
etc. I have not found anything that realy covers this stuff any and all
help would be welcomed!
The system calls are
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2000 at 10:08:45 +, visi0n wrote:
The THC have a documentation about freebsd kernel space.
packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/bsdkern.htm
Repeating the full URL for the benefit of mutt users, this is
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:20:11 -0800 (PST)
From: FengYue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stanley Hopcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntop, worlds greatest network monitor, no go on FreeBSD
you may consider copying this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:47:51PM +, Jamie Heckford wrote:
Very sorry for posting such a dumb question, but since I cvs'upd something
weird seems to have happened.
I am using this to compile my X app (which just uses Xlib.h at the mo)
gcc -L/usr/X11R6/include -o test test.cc
but
41 matches
Mail list logo
