At 11:18 PM -0800 3/24/01, Dan Feldman wrote:
You're right, there's no need to pick fights. But I'm just pointing out
that there's no reason FreeBSD should work particularly hard to create the
appearance of an alliance with Apple, when all they've done is use the
source of some kernel components
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:18:43PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote:
I tried to export this stuff in struct statfs, but ran into a problem:
I'd need the complete definitions of fs_args in sys/mount.h, but I
can't include, e.g., nfs/nfs.h because the
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010325 00:38] wrote:
bikeshed type=question value="mostly stupid"
Or could mount(8) invoke a couple of sysctl's to get a string representation
of each mountpoint's mount options?
/bikeshed
That seems like abuse of an interface.
--
-Alfred Perlstein -
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
I hate to follow up on my own post, but I have not heard a
word of comment, positive or negative...
You're probably one of the few people that has the hardware to play with
the ATM code in FreeBSD. This might account for your lack of feedback.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Matthe
w N. Dodd" writes:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
I hate to follow up on my own post, but I have not heard a
word of comment, positive or negative...
You're probably one of the few people that has the hardware to play with
the ATM code in
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Only mount_foofs can reasonably know about the options for foofs.
perhaps mount(8) could fork-exec mount_foofs(8) to print options for
foofs.
bikeshed type=question value="mostly stupid"
Or could mount(8) invoke a couple of sysctl's to get a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Ev
ans writes:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Only mount_foofs can reasonably know about the options for foofs.
perhaps mount(8) could fork-exec mount_foofs(8) to print options for
foofs.
bikeshed type=question value="mostly stupid"
Or
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
bikeshed type=question value="mostly stupid"
Or could mount(8) invoke a couple of sysctl's to get a string representation
of each mountpoint's mount options?
/bikeshed
This is not a bikeshed, but sysctl is the wrong interface to do
this.
Hello,
Does someone maintain/develop doscmd ?
It looks like there were no more commits since 1999...
Igor.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[in reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 25-03-2001]
In the meanwhile, why not ride their publicity wave a bit. After all,
they didn't base their work on Linux!
Yeah, but we could argue if this was a choice based on technical details
or if FreeBSD was just picked for the BSD license
(although I
At 3:52 PM +0200 3/25/01, Walter Hop wrote:
Yeah, but we could argue if this was a choice based on technical details
or if FreeBSD was just picked for the BSD license
The NeXT work had been done on 4.3BSD, so both the code base and the
implementors' background made the use of a BSDish
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
If the if_wx driver sucks, why not fix it rather than trying to coerce a
mega-companies with a deep political structure to change is policies?
But if youre not going to maintain it, dont do it at all. You cant stick it to
users by deciding later that
Hello,
(concerning freebsd4.2 Release)
I am a little bit in panic:
why are all my .o files in /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc and not in
/usr/src/lib/libc ?
I changed syscalls.master, created new syscall, made headers in
/usr/src/include and tried to make the libs via
make install in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maxime Henrion writes:
: Here is a patch to select the modules you want and don't want.
: The patch is for /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile from RELENG_4.
My patch is even simpler:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Jochen Kaiser wrote:
why are all my .o files in /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc and not in
/usr/src/lib/libc ?
Because that is how our make framework works w/in /usr/src
See the readme in /usr/share/mk/
I changed syscalls.master, created new syscall, made
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:23:20AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maxime Henrion writes:
: Here is a patch to select the modules you want and don't want.
: The patch is for /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile from RELENG_4.
My patch is even simpler:
Index: Makefile
One potential source of Permission Denied on a network socket for the root
user is the ipfw system. Do you have IP firewalling enabled, using either
ipfw or ipfilter, and if so, could those rules potentially be denying the
packets being generated? If you have logging/counters available for
Boris Popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not a bikeshed, but sysctl is the wrong interface to do
this. Use VFSs/VOPs instead. This isn't a big problem with passing string
from kernel to userland.
I like your idea of using the extattr interface. It isn't a perfect
match, since
At 10:19 PM -0800 3/24/01, Dan Feldman wrote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 1 Apr 2000
SEATTLE - The FreeBSD Project, Inc. officially welcomed
today the introduction of Apple Computer's Mac OS X. The
next-generation operating system uses the TCP/IP stack
of an obsolete version of FreeBSD's flagship
So, in a discussion a while back, it was established that file
locking is basically broken under NFS. Does this mean that it is
simply a REALLY BAD idea to put mail spool files on NFS mounts, or are
there ways that programs like /bin/mail can correctly ensure
consistency while reading in
Look for Alfred's commit of Mar 19th. There has been a *huge* overhaul of
the nfs stuff and (I think) a working lockd. I haven't looked at it
myself, so check it out for yourself.
-gordon
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Marc W wrote:
So, in a discussion a while back, it was established that file
Excellent, I will look for that. However, in the meantime, on
older systems (3.x, 4.x, etc ...), is the below assertion correct?
thanks!
marc.
Marc W, San Francisco, CA
Kiltdown -- a free email client for X
www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc W writes:
: Excellent, I will look for that. However, in the meantime, on
: older systems (3.x, 4.x, etc ...), is the below assertion correct?
I ran mail over NFS for a while, as well as using a mail program that
didn't do locking to sort my mail. In both
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Marc W wrote:
:
:Excellent, I will look for that. However, in the meantime, on
:older systems (3.x, 4.x, etc ...), is the below assertion correct?
:
You don't want to put mail spools on NFS filesystems. If you must, use the
maildir format, ala qmail.
David Scheidt
hello, i was wondering if anyone knew where i could find some good
documentation of freebsd internels, i am trying to get The Design and
Implimentation of the 4.4BSD Operating System but for right now i am looking
for some freely available docs on freebsd internels
thanks :-)
In the last episode (Mar 25), Marc W said:
So, in a discussion a while back, it was established that file
locking is basically broken under NFS. Does this mean that it is
simply a REALLY BAD idea to put mail spool files on NFS mounts, or
are there ways that programs like /bin/mail can
Mike Smith wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Let me just pipe in a bit. Compromise seems just like the kind of thing
marketing or legal would want to do. The problem is that _we_ cannot
compromise because one cannot write a "half-way there" driver. It's a
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:48:46PM -0500, Arthur Munn wrote:
hello, i was wondering if anyone knew where i could find some good
documentation of freebsd internels, i am trying to get The Design and
Implimentation of the 4.4BSD Operating System but for right now i am looking
for some freely
For a while I was working on an OS Development section for COTSE
(www.cotse.com), but unfortunately we never finished it. What I can
recommend is 4.4BSD DI, and (if you have the spendage, or have a friend
who owns them) the MKM videos from www.mckusick.com. There's some _really_
great
I currently have a Sharp pc ax20 laptop with an inbuilt rtl8139 nic. It works
wonderfully well on my works 100 meg switched network, at home I have a 10 meg
hub (can't afford a 100 meg switch yet) and it also works great for downloading
off the net nat'ed off my adsl connection. Though copying
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
I currently have a Sharp pc ax20 laptop with an inbuilt rtl8139 nic. It works
i have an AX10, similar design i suppose, and it works fast and fine for me
at 10megs. Are you sure the card isn't autoconfiguring for full duplex or
something
Hello there!
I just read FAQ on making release and have one question. FAQ says I must
be having full CVS source tree (or be able to access it via CVSROOT), but
I'm behind modem connection. So I'm curious why it is not enough to have
a cvsupped src-all/doc-all/ports-all collections? And is there
32 matches
Mail list logo
