Re: multilingual boot.flp for 4.3-RELEASE

2001-05-07 Thread Tatsumi Hosokawa
/20010507/ p.s. one question - should I translate LOCALIZE.TXT? It exists only in the form of English. You don't have to translate it, but of course, if you translate it to Korean, I will put it at texts/ko/. And please add my name to LOCALIZE.TXT... Renewal of Korean message

sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi folks, Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for opaque MIB entries named as arguments? I'm specifically interested in kern.proc.all. I can ``sysctl -A | grep kern.proc.all'', but it's weird that neither of these two do anything useful: sysctl -A

Re: Getting peer credentials on a unix domain socket

2001-05-07 Thread Mike Silbersack
On 7 May 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The silly part of it is that the socket's initial credentials might be different than the holder's credentials. That's a feature, just like you can open /dev/io as root, then drop root privs and do

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for opaque MIB entries named as arguments? Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't print

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable. Do you think it'd be okay to

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for opaque MIB entries named as arguments? Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't print a message when it omits printing an opaque

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:24:39PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex,

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sheldon Hearn writes: On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't print a message when it omits printing

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:43:39PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sheldon Hearn writes: On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? At least on ref5 as of this very moment.. Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? At least on ref5 as of this very moment.. Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored. OK, so

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored. OK, so I

Re: Q: porting a driver from linux to freebsd.

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Elischer
Robert Suetterlin wrote: Hello! I asked this already on freebsd-questions and was suggested to ask on this list, too. I have a linux driver for a video grabber card (dfg/bw1 from 'the imaging source'). This card does not use a well bt848 or similar chip. I would like to

Re: no keyboard

2001-05-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-May-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Ceri Storey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010505 11:59] wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Ingo Flaschberger wrote: Note : this is a way to kill your keyboard : an AT keyboard is not hot-plug compatible i have never killed a keyboard with un

(no subject)

2001-05-07 Thread Francois Zellinger
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need to be able to set my TCP/IP window size to 512KB (or perhaps more). I have tried doing this with sysctl: root@sebulba:p0 /root sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.recvspace=524288 net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 131072 - 524288 root@sebulba:p0

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need to be able to set my TCP/IP window size to 512KB (or perhaps more). I have tried doing this with sysctl: root@sebulba:p0 /root sysctl -w

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, May 06, 2001 at 17:14:08, rakshe (Rohit Rakshe) wrote about Re: FPU exception, kernel panic: (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) There were some reports in current@ about incorrect usage of i586_bzero() which uses FPU for zero-filling. It generated random

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:32:06AM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: Sun, May 06, 2001 at 17:14:08, rakshe (Rohit Rakshe) wrote about Re: FPU exception, kernel panic: (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) There were some reports in current@ about incorrect usage of

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:20:05PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: root@sebulba:p0 /root ftp 192.168.1.2 ftp: socket: No buffer space available One possibility is that your process limits for sbsize are too low. You could check what it says in login.conf. (I note that our tcsh doesn't support

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:52:47PM +0100, David Malone wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:20:05PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: root@sebulba:p0 /root ftp 192.168.1.2 ftp: socket: No buffer space available One possibility is that your process limits for sbsize are too low. You could check what

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need to be able to set my

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 17:15:20 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: I am working on a FreeBSD device

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:17:53PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 17:15:20 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05

bridging on specific devices

2001-05-07 Thread Marco Wertejuk
Hello, I'm using 4.2 release and i need bridging. Luigi tells in the manpage that the option to select specific devices for bridging is still in development. Does anybody know how far this work is done in 4.3 stable ? I need this feature very urgently, and all of my experiments with

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Valentin Nechayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) There were some reports in current@ about incorrect usage of i586_bzero() which uses FPU for zero-filling. It generated random kernel panics mainly on K6-2, also on P5-MMX and similars.

Re: bridging on specific devices

2001-05-07 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Hello, I'm using 4.2 release and i need bridging. Luigi tells in the manpage that the option to select specific devices for bridging is still in development. Does anybody know how far this work is done in 4.3 stable ? it works on 4.3-RELEASE cheers luigi I need this

Question about building source

2001-05-07 Thread Dave Hayes
Am I correct in assuming that: $ cd /usr/src $ make installworld DESTDIR=/vol1/FreeBSD will install the entire OS into /vol1/FreeBSD? Has anyone ever tried this? ;) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The opinions expressed above are entirely my own Man is