Tony Finch wrote:
[ ... Terry describes non-blocking I/O on page-not-present
on SVR4, and how it behaves better than BSD ... ]
How does it deal with the situation that the machine's
working set has exceeded memory? If the web server is dealing
with lots of concurrent connections it may
George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems like this before (it's the
reason
I did polling network
The idea was basically what you sketch at the end: implement a
very simple protocol which does the encapsulation (IP+UDP probably)
and retransmissions etc by itself. This is meant to be run on a dedicated
interface so we can neglect security issues.
I think there is a standard API for console
Eugene Panchenko wrote:
gretings.
As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with his
2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly
easily yield task activation delays which are one to two
orders of magnitude better than any competing
Julian Elischer wrote:
define a task activation delay and maybe we can discuss it..
it's a rather broad definition.
and is that RTlinux? (which is a completly differnt kettle of fish..)
Or QLinux, or RedHat (with rvm), as opposed to the Linus
version of Linux, which has an entirely
20/02/02 10:57:50, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
What is it?
You left off the URL. Looking on the site, it's not
posted to the front, and the search function does not
locate the article.
To answer your questions, you'll have to provide more
information. A Linux patch number
: snip
:
: No, it is a feature of the makefiles. 'Make' itself doesn't know
: anything about fetching sources and so on.
: Most of the dirty work is done in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk which is
: included by the port makefiles.
:
: which means I can safely use a similar makefile and
Hello,
I've been working on some code to filter ethernet frames in the
bridging code.
Because this is my first real attempt in coding for the kernel,
I'd appreciate any constructive comments on the code.
Code and a few install instructions can be found on http://jodocus.org/
Thanks
--
Hi
I coded a syscall which fork inside kernel and launch a new process.
The unique problem I got is when the father is waiting the child process
and received a sigkill signal. It freezes the system like a while (1) in
kernel mode.
Note that a sigkill to the child process does not matter at all.
Hi hackers!
Help to understand why my rc.conf system do
not want to use more ?
Before last reboot I make next:
#cp /usr/src/etc/defaults/rc.conf
/etc/defaults/rc.conf
# reboot
What's happen ??
I've tried to copy /etc/defaults/rc.conf from
another workable computer - no reason!
Regards,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the
using tcp for this is I think wrong..
Use UDP or maybe even an special protocol on IP.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the
Folks,
Thanks for all the helpful hints. Depending on what I find when I look
at how DDB/GDB work now I will probably do the following:
A) Use UDP/IP as the transport.
Reasons:
1) Easy to write a very minimal, outside the stack, IP/UDP layer.
2) Allows debugging through routers,
1/
can you say whay you want to do this?
2/
check the code that creates kernel threads, (kthread_create())
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Jonathan BENSAMOUN wrote:
Hi
I coded a syscall which fork inside kernel and launch a new process.
The unique problem I got is when the father is waiting the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules implementation been given
to a module dependency facility, in the
eberkut wrote:
No, the andrew morton's low latency patch (and the robert
love's preempt patch) try to make the kernel himself
preemptible to reduce latency. There is two different
approaches :
Uh, neither one of these is Ingo Molnar. 8-).
Robert Love: The model we use is to allow the
In the last episode (Feb 20), Cliff Sarginson said:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules
It seems Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I have a few machines with the following ata controller:
atapci0@pci0:15:1: class=0x01018a card=0x chip=0x0266 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
They're dual-boot FreeeBSD/linux boxes. After loosing 2 filesystems in
linux, I did a web search and I found that
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:42:40PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 20), Cliff Sarginson said:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
I may have forgotten a few things but this is the gist of how
it worked. Credit for all this work goes to someone else.
We had meant to give this back to the FreeBSD community but
didn't get around to it in time and now it is not possible.
Why
We had meant to give this back to the FreeBSD community but
didn't get around to it in time and now it is not possible.
Why not? (curiosity, not disbelief)
The company got sold before we could sort all this out and a
bunch of the original people no longer work there. Actually
anything is
Forgot to add: this is a pretty straight forward thing to do
and anyone can hack it together in a few days especially when
you have a functional spec of a sort!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Søren Schmidt writes:
Hmm, the problem is known, but belived to be fixed *IF* your BIOS
setup things the right way. I've newer seen the problem on my
ASUS CUR-DLS, but I have several reports of TYAN's (forgot the model#)
that fails all over. I have not verified if ASUS has done some
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Søren Schmidt writes:
However the Serverworks
ROSB4 chips is not one I would recommend using, if you need serious
ATA support on such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a
HPT370 or later ...
I don't much care about serious ATA support on these
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not be a problem, but
apparently, there is a very narrow band of correctly
(perhaps even only a single
At 18.2.2002, you wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2002 11:12, Robert Withrow wrote:
Hi:
I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working
on FreeBSD?
It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD
it should be possible to get the Linux
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not be a problem, but
apparently, there is a very narrow band of correctly
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW, Julian had to fix a similar problem by programming
the heck out of a Cyrix MediaGX chipset via a custom
BIOS.
*snort* (wakes up)..
wha? wha?
what is the problem?
The one I had to program around was bad DMA for transfers not on a 16 byte
basically yes.
there is a CRC on the disk block right?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not
Terry Lambert writes:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not be a problem, but
apparently, there is a
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not be a problem, but
apparently, there is a
Hi List,
I'm facing a serial write problem. Posix provides a function tcdrain ()
that blocks until all serial data has been written from the card. Is there
an analogous function in the gnu c compiler for windows platforms? Does the
gnu c compiler try to give you posix functionality within the
Hi,
I have a Winbond based card with an Altima AC104 media interface. No matter
what I do i am not able to recognize the AC104 through the SIO interface. The
BMSR register value stays at zero. I have the datasheets of both the Winbond
and the Altima and everything looks ok.
So far i see the
Søren Schmidt wrote:
... However the Serverworks ROSB4 chips is not one I
would recommend using, if you need serious ATA support on
such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a HPT370 or later ...
I think I've also seen you post that the Highpoint is better than the
Promise.
What is
At 16:32 20-2-2002 -0600, Lane, Frank L wrote:
Hi List,
I'm facing a serial write problem. Posix provides a function tcdrain ()
that blocks until all serial data has been written from the card. Is there
an analogous function in the gnu c compiler for windows platforms? Does the
gnu c compiler
On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 21:36:25 -0800, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Hi Folks,
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I suppose
you'd like to take a look at it.
That depends on where they put it. If it depends on I/OKit then we
won't be able to use it easily I figure.
Thanks for
yes but we might as well be protocol compatible if possible :-)
If only to re-use what they did in gdb :-)
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I suppose
you'd like to take a look at
you mean they use the same protocol?
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 17:03:38 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the
On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 04:14 PM, George V.
Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I suppose
you'd like to take a look at it.
That depends on where they put it. If it
On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 04:52 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
yes but we might as well be protocol compatible if possible :-)
If only to re-use what they did in gdb :-)
The Darwin/Mac OS X scheme only deals with IOKit because that's where
the drivers live. The protocol
This all look great. I've got a Darwin 1.4 CD at home, I'll check it
out tonight or some time this week.
Later,
George
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 15:48, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote:
At 18.2.2002, you wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2002 11:12, Robert Withrow wrote:
Hi:
I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase
working on FreeBSD?
It seems that if we can get the Linux
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Danny J. Zerkel wrote:
Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real
configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done
on FreeBSD in Perforce? The sooner FreeBSD and Linux can escape the clutches
of cvs, the better.
Lane, Frank L wrote:
I'm facing a serial write problem. Posix provides a function tcdrain ()
that blocks until all serial data has been written from the card. Is there
an analogous function in the gnu c compiler for windows platforms? Does the
gnu c compiler try to give you posix
Danny J. Zerkel wrote:
Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real
configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done
on FreeBSD in Perforce?
Frankly, it's because CVS only permits a single line of
concurrent developement, and it's a limiting
Julian Elischer wrote:
Having used several professional CM systems including Clearcase,
I've come to the conclusion that CVS is preferable to most of them
It gets out of your way and lets you work.
CLearcase makes you spend too much time wondering about
what machine is where and which
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
Danny J. Zerkel wrote:
Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real
configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done
on FreeBSD in Perforce?
Frankly, it's because CVS only permits a single line of
Hi!
I'll try again:
who can say me why system not using my
/etc/rc.conf ?
Regards,
Dmitry.
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
Danny J. Zerkel wrote:
Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real
configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done
on FreeBSD in Perforce?
Frankly, it's because CVS only permits a single line
David Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
Does Perforce support replicate like FreeBSD's current CVSUP support?
It's certainly possibly in theory, but I don't know that anyone has
ever tried it in practice.
if not, how does it support large number of users or connections?
In generaly, it works
While i understand the mechanism of hardware interrupt priority, I am curious to
know how the priority levels are achieved/implemented for software ( in
particular the various layers of the TCP/IP stack.. splxxx() ).
sridhar
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Bitkeeper is not closed source, and is freely available so long as you use open
logging. I haven't used bitkeeper on projects with more than a couple people so
I'm not in a position to comment on how well it scales. However, perforce is
what is used at NetApp (several hundreds of developers with
Hi,
I have recently purchased a Sony cd writer (model CRX175M) that has a
memory stick drive built in. The device comes up as afd0 but I am
unable to mount it. The snippet of my dmesg is...
vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on
isa0
sc0: System console at flags
56 matches
Mail list logo
