With FreeBSD 4.9 on the horizon, I thought I might bring this up again...
At 10:01 AM -0700 6/17/03, Rich Morin wrote:
I recently upgraded my motherboard and CPU, as:
478 pin Celeron; 2.1 GHz
512 MB DDR DIMM (2 ea.)
SiS962(L) Southbridge
I then found that I couldn't boot the (FreeBSD 4.7)
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:FreeBSD DevSummit pics are available at:
:
:http://apollo.backplane.com/BSDCON2003/
:
:The links at the bottom. About 31 people are attending.
They were saying that *1*31 people were attending, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can there be more than one 'vendor SOMETHING 0x0001 Desc' with different
SOMETHING and Desc in src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs ?
Best regards Søren
**
| Soeren Straarup
Matthew Dillon wrote this message on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 20:36 -0700:
BSDCon pictures are available as I have time to upload them:
http://apollo.backplane.com/BSDCON2003/
So what is the latest hit stats on this?
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225
It seems Rich Morin wrote:
With FreeBSD 4.9 on the horizon, I thought I might bring this up again...
There is no time for this on 4.9 (at least if it should be done properly.
5.1 has support for all SiS chipsets...
At 10:01 AM -0700 6/17/03, Rich Morin wrote:
I recently upgraded my
M. Warner Losh wrote this message on Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 00:33 -0600:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:FreeBSD DevSummit pics are available at:
:
:http://apollo.backplane.com/BSDCON2003/
:
:The links at the bottom. About 31
Rick C. Petty wrote this message on Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:52 -0500:
Hello. I posted a message to ports yesterday regarding the status of
sysutils/ffsrecov, which won't compile with UFS2 headers. I'm in dire need
of reconnecting or dumping inodes (well the associated files) because of a
In the last episode (Sep 14), Danny Braniss said:
hi all,
Any experiance with EMCsq./SAN? I know FreeBSD is not on their
list, but was wondering if it works even without the 'qualified'
stamp.
I'd be surprised if there were any problems, but if you already have an
EMC unit, let
: BSDCon pictures are available as I have time to upload them:
:
: http://apollo.backplane.com/BSDCON2003/
:
:So what is the latest hit stats on this?
:
:--
: John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
As of now,
For BSDCON:
197555 hits from
The recent thread about BSD-licensed replacements for GNU utilities in OpenBSD
has prompted me to share my reimplementation of the sort(1) utility.
Most of the code is new. sort.1 and obsolete.c came from 4.4BSD via NetBSD.
I've been using it instead of GNU sort on my systems for the past few
It seems Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion of the manual page
suggests, my plan is to get this in to FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for
some other GNU tools. I have a diff(1) replacement (with sdiff support) in
the works, among other things.
Go for
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Well, i would be very happy with my patch in FreeBSD project!
That without say that a real programmer would take care of the patch
:), and i will just use the features in my servers :))
I don't know what should i do. I did think that after i
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Kip Macy wrote:
We have FreeBSD machines connected to EMC 8830 working fine!
Leal
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMCsq/SAN
Unless they are giving it
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:FreeBSD DevSummit pics are available at:
:
:http://apollo.backplane.com/BSDCON2003/
:
:The links at the bottom. About 31 people are attending.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:53:56PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
It's not quite as fast as the GNU or 4.4BSD sort implementations
Why is this?
I often need to sort huge files, so I'd be reluctant to use an
implementation with a significant performance penalty.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
From: Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMCsq/SAN
To: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the last episode (Sep 14), Danny Braniss said:
hi all,
Any experiance with EMCsq./SAN? I know FreeBSD is not on their
list, but was wondering if it works even
As an aside, when considering SAN solutions you should have a good look at
the HP (Compaq) EMA product. I bought one at a previous company and for
1/5th the cost of EMC we got all of the features and fantastic support.
Well worth the phone call.
Max
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:49:06PM -0700, Max Clark wrote:
As an aside, when considering SAN solutions you should have a good look at
the HP (Compaq) EMA product. I bought one at a previous company and for
1/5th the cost of EMC we got all of the features and fantastic support.
The only
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/ma8kema12k/index.html
The only downside is that the HSG80 based EMA products are EOL now.
They can be had as used equipment of course.
When did they announce an EOL for the HSG80?
-Max
___
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:59:59PM -0700, Max Clark wrote:
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/ma8kema12k/index.html
The only downside is that the HSG80 based EMA products are EOL now.
They can be had as used equipment of course.
When did they announce an EOL for the HSG80?
[NOTE: IPv6-only e-mail above, so you probably want to drop me from
the recipients and just send to the list, which I'll read later, as
I'm not always online -- else remove just the hostname part to reveal
an IPv4-aware e-mail for me that may well timeout and bounce. Sorry.]
Hello gurus and
[NOTE: IPv6-only e-mail above, so you probably want to drop me from
the recipients and just send to the list, which I'll read later, as
I'm not always online -- else remove JUST the hostname part to reveal
an IPv4-aware e-mail for me that may still timeout and bounce. Sorry.]
Hello hallowed
--- Raunchy McSmutbag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my mobo doesnt have agp - it's a PCCHIPS m754lmr. The a
href=http://www.pcchips.com.tw/M754LMR.htmlsite/a says its
supposed to
have AGP but mine doesnt.
Play a little with your BIOS configuration and see if you can config
your AGP. And a little
If one of you has had a chance to test this properly, please go ahead and
commit. I don't have remote -STABLE development boxes, so haven't been
able to do any -STABLE merging since I went to BSDCon. I did get RE
permission to MFC this change.
FYI, I have a bunch more related changes in a patch
It appears that pr-55886 is entirely different bug. After applying the
above patch, I can still get a kernel panic due to mbufs exhaustion.
Mike Silby Silbersack wrote:
1. Can you compile INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT into your kernel?
After compiling INVARIANTS* into the kernel, here's
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:43:07AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:53:56PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
It's not quite as fast as the GNU or 4.4BSD sort implementations
Why is this?
Because it spends too much time comparing lines. In particular, it seems to be
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools.
Might we put this in freebsd-current (5.x), but under some
other name?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:24:00PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools.
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools.
Might we put this in freebsd-current (5.x), but
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU
At 9:47 PM -0400 9/15/03, Richard Coleman wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools.
I know it's lame, but I am curious if there is a ETA on 4.9.
Any feedback (one day, one week) appreciated.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:52:54PM -0700, Josh Brooks wrote:
I know it's lame, but I am curious if there is a ETA on 4.9.
Any feedback (one day, one week) appreciated.
Help yourself: http://www.freebsd.org/releng/
=)
Brandon D. Valentine
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
no luck.. the only agp my mobo has is the onboard card (TNT2 32 megs.. piece
of shit). i tried playing with it but same thing. I really think its a
kernel bug :O
From: Paulo Roberto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Raunchy McSmutbag [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: motherboard agp panic
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:52:54PM -0700, Josh Brooks wrote:
I know it's lame, but I am curious if there is a ETA on 4.9.
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/schedule.html
Looks like it's going to be a more two weeks.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website:
Dear Recipients:
We are happy to announce that the USENIX AsiaBSDCon 2004 will take
place at Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan between March 13 2004 and
March 15 2004.
We would like to invite all whom are interested in BSD and their
applications (including but not limited to: bioinformatics,
Hi ,
I am just testing jail on my FreeBSD4.8-stable box, i found i can not ssh to the jail
environment, but i can telnet to jail environment, the sshd is running both inside and
outside jail. What's the problem.
With following link is i ask in www.freebsdforums.org .
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
If one of you has had a chance to test this properly, please go ahead and
commit. I don't have remote -STABLE development boxes, so haven't been
able to do any -STABLE merging since I went to BSDCon. I did get RE
permission to MFC this change.
Finally, after adding and removing printfs and DELAYs in different
places, I found that probably after status inquiry, one must wait just
a little moment before doing anything with IDE device. The following
patch seems to fix the problem.
Thank you for all of you who participated in the effort
39 matches
Mail list logo
