trying my luck here :-)
newer kernels (after Oct. 20) are breacking bge.
i've checked the cvsdiffs, but nothing seems relevant.
the ilo (Integrated Lights Out) port, bge1, though not configured, gets
configured to 10baseT/UTP full-duplex, and no magic will
get it to 100/full-duplex, which is
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
trying my luck here :-)
newer kernels (after Oct. 20) are breacking bge.
i've checked the cvsdiffs, but nothing seems relevant.
the ilo (Integrated Lights Out) port, bge1, though not configured, gets
configured to 10baseT/UTP
Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
Hi !
pkg_add is crashing with a segmentation fault:
pkg_add -v mysql-client-5.1.22.tbz
Requested space: 3809856 bytes, free space: 128323438592 bytes
in /var/tmp/instmp.ND8UBU
extract: Package name is mysql-client-5.1.22
extract: CWD to /usr/local
extract:
another question.
in my 'dmesg' i have NIC - em0 Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
Version - 6.6.6...is it support Tigon driver that need to set
ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS ?
thx
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0700, binto wrote:
I try to compile MYKERNEL to set zero_copy tigon driver in
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
trying my luck here :-)
newer kernels (after Oct. 20) are breacking bge.
i've checked the cvsdiffs, but nothing seems relevant.
the ilo (Integrated Lights Out) port, bge1, though not configured, gets
configured to
Roman Kurakin wrote:
By the way, is there any chance to get RAID5 working with this controller?
Software only.
--
./lxnt
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:52:38 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 08), Randall Hyde said:
It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow.
Yes, I realize that when processing large files I really ought to be
doing block/buffered I/O to get the best
By the way, is there any chance to get RAID5 working with this controller?
rik
Alexander Sabourenkov wrote:
Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Rather than the marginal HW part, it seems, for me, closely related to
MB/BIOS (as well (Alexander apperently has about the same setup as I
have for this
First of all I am posting to both -current and -hackers because
-hackers seems to be very low volume.
I just set up a master server development server using the procedure
in development(7) which was fairly clear but left a few questions
unanswered (and one odd behavior). I have only the master
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:te:
In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but with
the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run vmstat
-i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute) during the
good and bad times, since it only provides
2. If yes to #1 how do I setup keeping everything except my modified
code in sync (and if possible to retro activally apply patchs from the
local branch unto the main source tree [/usr/src2])
You won't be able to commit to the BSD repo from your server. I
think you should treat your repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you keep a local repo, and checkout from the local repo, then
your checkout will merge the changes (unless there are conflicts).
Thanks the fact I know the answer you gave is quite simple but
completely over my head shows I need a good
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:56:24AM +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
1. If I am modifing code and such should I have a local branch?
You can either maintain a local branch or keep backing up your
diffs against the main source tree. Which one is better depends
on the size of your changes and your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OutbackDingo wrote:
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems
such as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it
well, there is also a mercurial respository for FreeBSD out there
some where
If I need to
On Nov 8, 2007, at 11:36 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
2. If yes to #1 how do I setup keeping everything except my modified
code in sync (and if possible to retro activally apply patchs from
the
local branch unto the main source tree [/usr/src2])
You won't be able to commit to the BSD
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
First of all I am posting to both -current and -hackers because
-hackers seems to be very low volume.
I just set up a master server development server using the procedure
in development(7) which was fairly clear but left a few questions
unanswered (and one odd
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems such
as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it well,
there is also a mercurial respository for FreeBSD out there some where
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 05:36 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
2. If yes to #1 how
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:49 +0800, OutbackDingo wrote:
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems such
as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it well,
there is also a mercurial respository for FreeBSD out there some where
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:43 +, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:49 +0800, OutbackDingo wrote:
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems such
as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it well,
there is also a mercurial respository for
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 05:47 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you keep a local repo, and checkout from the local repo, then
your checkout will merge the changes (unless there are conflicts).
Thanks the fact I know the answer you gave
On 2007-11-09 21:49, OutbackDingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems such
as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it well,
there is also a mercurial respository for FreeBSD out there some where
That is cool, but it
You should also carefully do an strace or similar on
Windows and Linux as well. You may find that you're
doing a system call per byte on FreeBSD but not on
those other systems.
Certainly this might be possible under Windows, as I have no idea what
happens once I link in one of the various
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman said:
First of all I am posting to both -current and -hackers because
-hackers seems to be very low volume.
Please do not cross post. It is considered bad form and generates
thousands of unnecessary emails.
Beech
--
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:te:
In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the good and bad times, since it
You won't be able to commit to the BSD repo from your server.
Well, Aryeh wants to commit to a _local_ copy of the BSD repo.
This works. See development(7).
One thing the man page does not mention is that you need to change
the commit hook in CVSROOT (which you only copy on first sync and
OutbackDingo wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:43 +, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:49 +0800, OutbackDingo wrote:
well thats kinda hard to do with CVS, though other revision systems such
as mercurial, bazaar, git and perforce, even subversion do it well,
there is also a mercurial
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Maslan wrote:
That would be great.
I'll wait for the patch
On Nov 6, 2007 1:01 PM, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maslan wrote:
Package dependencies may change, depending on the user
settings and
port maintainers configuration for the port (i.e.
27 matches
Mail list logo
