On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:49 +0300
From: Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com
To: Lukáš Czerner czerner.lu...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to change vnode operations ?
On (22/04/2010 16:02), Lukáš Czerner wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:27PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spörlein, and lo! it spake thus:
I have a .hg directory sitting in / for every machine I usually take
care of. hgignore is of course set to *, so only explicitly added files
are tracked.
I do pretty much the same thing
I was recently given an original Happy Hacking Keyboard. As I sometimes
work in the FreeBSD console, I wanted to have my usual console keymap
adjusted to the new keyboard, but didn't know the scancode for the HHKB
meta key (the diamond key). I couldn't find any program in base or ports
that would
On (23/04/2010 08:10), Lukáš Czerner wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:49 +0300
From: Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com
To: Lukáš Czerner czerner.lu...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to change vnode operations ?
Hi Ken,
cc hackers@, re@
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 21:09 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi hackers@,
No replies in over 4 days to this, so this is a repost,=20
I've also added re@ as newish memstick.img might interest them ?
(The live command prompt on F4 wasn't much use, no ls yet.)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:14 -0700
Steve Franks bahamasfra...@gmail.com wrote:
It's much safer to just leave the libraries alone. __Just because you
upgraded libpng doesn't mean that your old gtk binary will stop working
(assuming you are using portupgrade or portmaster -w which preserves
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi hack...@freebsd.org
with amd64, but not with i386,
/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC COMPAT_FREEBSD7 is an undocemneted
pre-requisite for COMPAT_IA32
On Friday 23 April 2010 2:50:15 am Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:27PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spörlein, and lo! it spake thus:
I have a .hg directory sitting in / for every machine I usually take
care of. hgignore is of course set to *, so only
The changes to use NLS for strerror sometimes cause one of my virtual
machines to deadlock. This virtual machine runs 9-CURRENT, acquires its
IP address via DHCP (virtualbox host-only networking), has no default
route and has /usr/local and /usr/home NFS mounted.
When the DHCP lease expires such
Aryeh M. Friedman writes:
I acciddentally rm'ed my /var/db/pkg and want to know is it
possible to rgenerate it (I have portmaster and portupgrade
installed)
(I'm assuming you have _completely_ deleted the contents of
/var/db/pkg.)
If you have not deleted
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:17:36PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
The changes to use NLS for strerror sometimes cause one of my virtual
machines to deadlock. This virtual machine runs 9-CURRENT, acquires its
IP address via DHCP (virtualbox host-only networking), has no default
route and has
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
The patch:
Index: lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c
===
--- lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c (revision 206760)
+++ lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c (working copy)
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@
- use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
For what?
For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
access they are the same speed (forgetting look-ahead caching). For
random access matrix is faster.
___
Quoting Equixen- equi...@gmail.com (from Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:05:12 +0530):
Hello!
I am a 3rd year B.Tech (Computer Science) student. I want to
participate in some open source project during my summer vacations.
I thought about going the Google summer of code way but due to limited
on 22/04/2010 18:04 RevLin Software said the following:
Hello All
My name is Patrick Quinn
I am currently part of a team working on a new operating system called
RevLin OS. RevLin OS will use a new desktop environment called RaVe that is
coded almost entirely in web language (Css html5
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
- use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
For what?
For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
access they are the same speed (forgetting look-ahead caching). For
random access matrix is faster.
On Friday 23 April 2010 17:40:12 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
- use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
For what?
For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
access they are the same speed
I'm looking at kern_idle.c in stable/7 and I don't quite follow how idle
threads work. The kthread_create(9) call does not pass in a function
pointer, so what code does a processor run when there is no other
runnable thread?
Thanks,
matthew
___
2010/4/24 Matthew Fleming matthew.flem...@isilon.com:
I'm looking at kern_idle.c in stable/7 and I don't quite follow how idle
threads work. The kthread_create(9) call does not pass in a function
pointer, so what code does a processor run when there is no other
runnable thread?
In STABLE_7:
then they rightly passes sched_idletd(). Any scheduler may define its
own version of sched_idletd().
Oops, youre right, I was just unable to read at the end of the day on Friday.
Thanks!
matthew
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi All,
I have a pager monitoring system built on FreeBSD 6.4 that uses the
ltmdm driver.
(ltmdm is a controllerless winmodem)
I was looking into updating to FreeBSD 8 and I see that ltmdm and
hcfmdm are now
both broken. hcfmdm broke on FreeBSD 7 but it is easily patched to
build on
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:56:39AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:21:16PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
Just asking opinions, if people want this, I'll make a patch and
file a PR.
Is this script correct?
We're starting to use SSDs for boot drives in our freebsd
22 matches
Mail list logo
