DJB's code, a last resort? I surely wouldn't refer to all of it as a
last resort, not in the least. To each his own - of course. Although I
certainly think you're belittling someone with plenty of skill. Do you
regard Qmail as a last resort MTA? I'd have to disagree strongly there.
-mpf
I notice the exact same behavior with my wireless Logitechs which were
purchased retail, they all appear to do this. Actually, if you notice
it's always one of the previous keys your pressed, it's as if the repeat
rate is somewhat delayed. This has occured in all OS's for me,
regardless of
I'm not sure if it's what you're hitting, but Perhaps the sysctl
kern.ipc.maxsockets needs to be raised, though it seems like you'd
need a decent amount of concurrent active sessions to reach this
ceiling. Also it's read-only, so you'll want to tune it in loader.conf.
-mpf
Danny Braniss wrote:
Personally I prefer the flat file configuration, as it's much more
intuitive, and an obfuscated method of configuring my kernel just isn't
for me. To each his own of course, but I myself will always stick to
vi'ing my kernel's config. It's the fastest, most efficient way IMHO.
(Not to say,
Anand Subramanian wrote:
Hi All,
I am using an Intel Celeron box (single CPU,1.7GHz, 495MB real and 472 MB
avail memory, FreeBSD 5.2.1 #15 release), to run a daemon process which
shares a circular queue/buffer with the kernel. The daemon drains objects
off the front of the queue while the queue
Howdy,
I've been digging around google for an hour now trying to find info
on multipathing in freebsd, I've stumbled on a few patches that pull it
off, latest of which was for 4.8-stable located at:
http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~tanzer/multipath/
Unfortunately it's tossing errors during
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Klemm wrote:
Is there a freebsd tool that shows you in realtime, which users
are logged in from remote using which pty port ?
So to say something like
while true
do
clear; w; sleep 10
done
Preferable as X11 application.
The closest thing to my
Narvi wrote:
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whatever. I've consulted lawyers on this who assure me that it is
legal. You've admitted to not knowing US Copyright law and are aguing
emotion, which is why I didn't reply to the rest of your message.
It is not clear that
Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
Compiled fine with this setup.
I need ipfilter as it's doing my source routing for ipv6 (multiple
transits) since ip6fw doesn't support fwd. (I just use ip6fw for
filtering, and ipf for forwarding to the correct interface
Now I can play with ULE, Thanks for your quick response. I should've
checked release notes before posting my question, my fault.
-mpf
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
Compiled fine
For FreeBSD to support that many concurrent connections some kernel
values must be tweaked. Namely, you'll need to set
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=81920 in loader.conf as it's a read-only oid.
Another route is to add options NMBCLUSTERS=81920 into your kernel
and compile/install (if it's too
'kern.ipc.nmbclusters' is a read only tunable
sysctl: Tunable values are set in /boot/loader.conf
snip
-mpf
---
Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air
---
Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:20:43 -0600
Matt Freitag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For FreeBSD to support that many
12 matches
Mail list logo
