Hi,
after today's update of 9.1-STABLE I noticed that make build[world|kernel] are
taking conciderable more time, is it because the upgrade of clang?
and if so, is the code produced any better?
before:
buildwordl: 26m4.52s real 2h28m32.12s user 36m6.27s sys
buildkernel: 7m29.42s real
Thanks Chris!
It will take me some time do fully digets all this!,
but at least the picture is less murky.
danny
for example, this host has has 32G of physical memory ...
[snip - dmesg:]
real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
avail memory = 32191340544 (30700 MB)
[snip]
and from
Hi,
to run some tests, I reduced the physical memory by setting hw.physmem,
which got me to do some comparisons, and the more I looked around the
more confused I got.
for example, this host has has 32G of physical memory
from dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979,
happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel Size
why only in embedded system. smaller programs are always good :)
And yes FreeBSD kernel
never underestimate the human stupidity (mine in this case) nor of the boot.
pmbr will load the whole partition, which was 1M, instead of the size of
gptboot :-(
reducing the size of the slice/partition fixed the issue.
pmbr doesn't have room to be but so smart. It can't parse a
hi,
this is the output from gpart show:
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34 2048 1 freebsd-boot (1.0M)
20824194304 2 freebsd-ufs [bootme] (2.0G)
4196386 12582912 3 freebsd-swap (6.0G)
16779298 959993837 4 freebsd-zfs (457G)
=
hi,
this is the output from gpart show:
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34 2048 1 freebsd-boot (1.0M)
20824194304 2 freebsd-ufs [bootme] (2.0G)
4196386 12582912 3 freebsd-swap (6.0G)
16779298 959993837 4 freebsd-zfs
...@mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.fig.ol.no id
r0MCNtes050242
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:24+0100, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:21+0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
=20
hi,
this is the output
from first local disk at 0x07c00 and booting as with normal hard drive.
instead of pxeboot, try giving /boot/boot0
works, except of delay.
fixed from sources for 1s delay :)
may the source be with you :-)
btw, the above works for MBR, if you use GPT then you should use
pmbr.
danny
does anyone know a PXE image (just like /boot/pxeboot) that can be placed
on tftp server and the only thing it will do would be loading first sector
from first local disk at 0x07c00 and booting as with normal hard drive.
instead of pxeboot, try giving /boot/boot0
what i need is to be able
hi,
as soon as I 'initialize' a virtual disk via gpart, even if nothing
is mounted, the pxeboot adds around 60s delay to show the boot menu,
- I don't know if the delay is in boot or pxeboot.
if I destroy the geom, the the boot menu appears inmediately.
any insight?
danny
[snip]
any fix?
You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build
that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld
time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while still
being able to build the system.
Warner
where can
reposting to hackers, maybe better luck here?
When using an amd64 host to 'make TARGET_ARCH=i386 buildworld' it seems that
it's using the wrong cpp, at least when building ioctl.c via mkioctl in
usr.bin/ktrace and having set WITHOUT_CPP(*). This used to work with
previous releases.
...
===
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enigCDF012FCB4FC78B4732FDA45
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 8/28/12 3:14 PM, Andy Young wrote:
I am relatively new to using IO monitoring tools and wanted
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:46:28 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
hi,
this host has to disks:
sa0 gpart show
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k
hi,
this host has to disks:
sa0 gpart show
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k)
1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 33554432 3 freebsd-swap (16G)
37748898 939024237 4 freebsd-zfs (447G)
= 34
Hi,
with 8,x an previous, I compile kernel with
options KDB
options DDB
options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
and so hitting control+alt+escape would enter the debugger on the console,
or CR ~ ^b on the serial console.
the same config on 9.1, only if
pacija wrote:
- Original Message -
Dear list readers,
I am having a problem with pxe loader on FreeBSD 9.0 i386 release. No
matter what value I put for DHCP option 017 (Root Path) in Microsoft
DHCP server, pxe always sets root path:
pxe_open: server path: /
I've read
--=-etjkwQYOTmf8U9KY0eW8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
pacija wrote:
- Original Message -
Dear list readers,
I am having a problem with pxe loader on FreeBSD 9.0 i386 release. No
matter what value I put for DHCP
I need to control some lab equipment with several usb based controllers
(mostly serial) and was wondering if it can be done over IP, there is such a
thing called usbip, but couldn't find what 'server' is needed.
all the boxes I found are not cheep, but worse, only provide binaries
for windows, or
Hi,
On 2012-05-21 12:46, Daniel Braniss wrote:
I need to control some lab equipment with several usb based controllers
(mostly serial) and was wondering if it can be done over IP, there is such a
thing called usbip, but couldn't find what 'server' is needed.
all the boxes I found
--047d7b10ce794d5a1004c08b261e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
something similar is being done in the latest versions of qemu. There is a
usb redirection module which is in the form of a client/server architecture
where USB packets are sent over IP. These two modules
hi,
doing
portmaster -a
today wants to upgrade php5.3 to php5.4 which I'm
not ready yet, so I dis-installed php5 and installed php53, but
now portmaster wants to upgrade the php extentiosn to 5.4 even though
php is 5.3.13.
what (if any :-), is the magic to convince portmaster to compile
On 5/9/2012 10:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Hi,
after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
ugen0.2: USB MMC Storage Sierra Wireless at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST
spd=FULL
(12Mbps) pwr=ON
bLength = 0x0012
Hi,
after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
ugen0.2: USB MMC Storage Sierra Wireless at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
(12Mbps) pwr=ON
bLength = 0x0012
bDescriptorType = 0x0001
bcdUSB = 0x0110
bDeviceClass =
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:11:25 -0500, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote:
Hi All
There was some mention before that time stops under vmware, and now it's
happened
to me :-)
the clock stopped now, the system is responsive, but eg
sleep 1
never finishes
Hi All
There was some mention before that time stops under vmware, and now it's
happened
to me :-)
the clock stopped now, the system is responsive, but eg
sleep 1
never finishes.
Is there a solution?
btw, I'm running 8.2-stable, i'll try 8.3 soon.
danny
Hi,
Just saw that PCEngines has a new board, with SIM socket, but to get
it working, it needs a mimi pci express modem, and
from http://www.pcengines.ch/alix6e1.htm
'On Alix, only USB 2.0 connectivity is supported' ...
does this means the modem appears as a usb device?
cheers,
--20cf300fb4297a2a2904aa0f78ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 8 August 2011 11:30, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
On 8/8/11 5:33 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
According to Daniel Braniss:
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR
Hi,
I managed to get boot to load the kernel, but the kernel can't find
the root:
...
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from
the loader prompt:
set vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw
and then
According to Daniel Braniss:
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from
the loader prompt:
Have you set the bootfs property (see http://www.keltia.net/howtos/zfsboot)
on the pool?
yes, in my
On 8/8/11 5:33 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
According to Daniel Braniss:
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following
from
the loader prompt:
Have you set the bootfs property (see
http
on 08/08/2011 09:56 Daniel Braniss said the following:
Hi,
I managed to get boot to load the kernel, but the kernel can't find
the root:
...
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from
Im trying to install matlab R2010B-Mac-Linux under freebsd-8.2-STABLE,
having installed linux_base-f10-10_4 but keep getting:
rnd# /compat/linux/bin/sh ./install
Preparing installation files ...
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:40:11AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
And that non-broadcast ethernet address is the MAC of your
default router?
yes.
with dest_addr = INADDR_BROADCAST on the non diskless:
09:44:29.850576 00:0d:b9:00:72:a8 (oui Unknown) 00:04:38:a0:c6:07 (oui
Unknown
Hi Eygene,
Daniel, good day.
Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:04:27PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
this code behaves correctly when run from a diskless host which
booted via PXE, but fails on a host that was booted from disk.
hint: the non working sends a packet with a non ethernet broadcast
this code behaves correctly when run from a diskless host which booted via PXE,
but fails on a host that was booted from disk.
hint: the non working sends a packet with a non ethernet broadcast address and
an ip address of 255.255.255.255, the working version sets the ethernet address
to
On 6/7/11 6:33 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
I've been working on fixing problems with printf(9), log(9) and
related functions. Today I tried converting printf(9) to write
to the log rather than directly to the console, unless the log is
not open, in which case the message is also sent to the
On 5/20/11 5:32 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Daniel Branissda...@cs.huji.ac.il:
no, Who's on 3rd
what's on 2nd!
btw, there was something similar using unix commands ...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
We have a host, providing mainly http/postgres service, and its
swap usage is increasing. Is there any way to check which process
is using swap space?
some facts
it's running 8.2-stable/amd64
has 24gb of memory
zfs seems to be ok, arc size too.
top says 32G in use, while vmstat avm
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 04:46:53PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, dieter...@engineer.com wrote:
Suggestion 2: The kernel may not have
re-posting here to see if I'm more successful:
---BeginMessage---
I have been running the experimental nfs/mount for some time now, and
it mostly works, except with this particular case, where the mountd just
gets stuck:
mountd 11762 [dp-dp_config_rwlock] 8.93r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1320k
and stops
I asked this on stable, and since there were no takers, trying my luck here.
I see these messages:
ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to gpt/r0/swap.
ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to mfid0p3.
I have 2 'disks' /dev/label/r0 and /dev/label/r5,
the r0 is gparted such:
=34 1952448445 mfid0 GPT
I have:
sf-03 gpart show
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (466G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64K)
1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 100663296 3 freebsd-swap (48G)
104857762 871915373 4 freebsd (416G)
= 34 976773101 ada1 GPT
:Well, since a server specifies the maximum file size it can
:handle, it seems good form to check for that in the client.
:(Although I'd agree that a server shouldn't crash if a read/write
: that goes beyond that limit.)
:
:Also, as Matt notes, off_t is signed. As such, it looks to me like
On 18.1.2011 16:48, Daniel Braniss wrote:
I have:
sf-03 gpart show
= 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (466G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64K)
1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 100663296 3 freebsd-swap (48G)
104857762 871915373
:Try editting line #1226 of sys/nfsclient/nfs_vfsops.c, where
:it sets nm_maxfilesize = (u_int64_t)0x8000 * DEV_BSIZE - 1; and make it
:something larger.
:
:I have no idea why the limit is set that way? (I'm guessing it was the
:limit for UFS.) Hopefully not some weird buffer cache
the provider in this case is mfid0
mfi0: Dell PERC H700 Integrated
mfid0: MFI Logical Disk on mfi0
mfid0: 953344MB (1952448512 sectors) RAID volume 'r0' is optimal
so I first use gpart:
gpart create -s GPT mfid0
gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr mfid0
On 14.01.2011 13:37, Daniel Braniss wrote:
and on the console:
GEOM: mfid0: the secondary GPT table is corrupt or invalid.
GEOM: mfid0: using the primary only -- recovery suggested.
GEOM: mfid0: the secondary GPT table is corrupt or invalid.
GEOM: mfid0: using
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig796DC9FCBCDF02E77B675B44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 14.01.2011 14:33, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On 14.01.2011 13:37, Daniel Braniss wrote
I'm getting 'File too large' when copying via NFS(v3, tcp/udp) a file
that is larger than 1T. The server is ZFS which has no problem with
large
files.
Is this fixable?
As I understand it, there is no FreeBSD VFSop that returns the maximum
file size supported. As such, the NFS
I'm getting 'File too large' when copying via NFS(v3, tcp/udp) a file
that is larger than 1T. The server is ZFS which has no problem with large
files.
Is this fixable?
Cheers,
danny
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig0AE178BF2380C8CAA3249E0C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 09/01/2011 04:38, Daniel Braniss wrote:
There was a post on the embedded list that suggested
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig51B4786EC9D39188BAE04052
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=070003060308030201090207
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--070003060308030201090207
Content-Type: text/plain;
On 10/9/10 7:30 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[ ... ] is the same thing as [ -n ... ] or test -n ...
[ ! ... ] is the same things as [ -z ... ] or test -z ...
I'll never understand why people have to throw an extra letter in there and
then compare it to that letter.
I ran into issues
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:45 -0700, Dirk-WIllem van Gulik wrote:
On 31 Aug 2010, at 17:16, Sean Bruno wrote:
An issue in testing came up where we were trying to mount NFS
directories from the same server, i.e. a machine trying to mount an NFS
dir on itself.
Because
Hi,
probably wrong place to ask, but I great minds lurk here :-)
I have been mirroing FreeBSD via svn since last summer,
svnsync sync file:///cs/svn/freebsd/base
then converting to mercurial
hg convert ... file:///cs/svn/freebsd/base ${HG_HOME}/bsd/stable/8 ...
since I can better
On 21.04.2010 10:01, pluknet wrote:
Hmm.. That's strange to hear.
We have in production a number of x3650m2: 7.2-R, 7.3-R (all amd64).
All runs flawlessly.
I'll try to boot it from head today if that matters.
It was about 1.5 hour ago when i entered autoboot in loader prompt.
It
Hi,
While trying to find out why our NSF/ZFS servers now hangs about once a
week, I got hold of a similiar box, and got a bit more ambitious, I connected
it via 2 NICs, to complicate things a bit, the server boots via pxeboot (ie, is
datatless). After fiddling with the default gateway,
hi,
we are evaluating a Sun X2270, with 24 GB of memory.
initial boot shows:
Aug 19 09:07:51 x2270.cs.huji.ac.il kernel: real memory = 15032385536 (14336
MB)
(the date is wrong, but it auto-fixed via ntpdate later)
next reboots:
Dec 23 20:24:33 x2270.cs.huji.ac.il kernel: real memory =
60 matches
Mail list logo
