On Thursday, 28 February 2002 at 11:42:17 +1100, Andrew wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Wilkinson,Alex wrote:
ie a way to know that the kernel has been updated so I can compile the
new one.
cvsup and watch the output is probably easiest.
Note that it's not possible to build a new kernel
On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 21:36:25 -0800, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Hi Folks,
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I suppose
you'd like to take a look at
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 17:03:38 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic
On Wednesday, 30 January 2002 at 9:41:15 -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
Caldera's License Agreement:
http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It
implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it doesn't give explicit
release
- Forwarded message from Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:55:04 -0700
From: Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Tuesday, 29 January 2002 at 15:56:32 -0800, Dion Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:05:20AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:55:04 -0700, Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, where have you heard that it's been relicensed?
http://minnie.tuhs.org/PUPS
On Monday, 28 January 2002 at 18:34:10 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I
[moved to -chat]
On Monday, 7 January 2002 at 21:21:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 01/07/2002 7:32:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Drool away, buddy! Here's mine, and it still works (chicklet
keyboard, built in cassette drive, metal filing
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 13:23:50 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
Information that could be interesting is (here my values):
Processor:AMD Duron 850
Motherboard: ECS K7VZA
Memory:1 128 MB SIMM, 100 MHz.
What FreeBSD version are you using ? I
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 6:21:04 -0800, Keith Simonsen wrote:
Greg,
Do not forget to check your power supply make/model. If you search on google
for AMD's recommended hardware list, double check you're power supply is
listed for your cpu.
This wouldn't explain why it works fine under
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 14:46:12 -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 06:10:09PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I've been using AMD processors almost exclusively in my main work
machines for over 4 years, and I've been very happy with them. I'm
currently running a K6/233
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 23:12:40 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Glenn Johnson wrote:
It is really hard for me to say if this is FreeBSD specific because I do
not tend to stress the system much when I have Linux running. My wife
has an identical system running Windows 98SE and
I've been using AMD processors almost exclusively in my main work
machines for over 4 years, and I've been very happy with them. I'm
currently running a K6/233, a K6/333, an Athlon 750, a Duron 850 and
an Athlon XP 1700. Last August, though, I bought a machine which gave
me a lot of trouble,
On Monday, 17 December 2001 at 22:50:45 -, Dave Reyenga wrote:
How about writing a new filesystem based on UFS?
If it's based on UFS, it's not a new file system.
This would save all of the hassle that JFS would bring: licensing,
porting time, etc.
There are no hassles with licensing.
On Sunday, 16 December 2001 at 18:37:33 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
I would say that FreeBSD already has a nearly-working UFS
implementation. Also, the structure of UFS is so well documented in
various books that, even if FreeBSD's UFS implementation was
deficient, it could be rectified with
On Sunday, 16 December 2001 at 17:18:37 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
In article by Greg Lehey:
[about if and how Caldera is enforcing the Ancient UNIX
http://www2.caldera.com/offers/ancient.html. Note also
that in fact they allow access to the code via
license
On Saturday, 15 December 2001 at 0:39:32 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Do you have small images of this FS, as well as header files that
are redistributable (e.g. BSD license) and/or code?
If you have the tools sources (e.g. newfs, fsck, etc.), this would
be useful, as well
On Saturday, 15 December 2001 at 3:18:33 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Unfortunately, it's still copyrighted. You need an SCO license; want
to go and get one of them? It doesn't cost anything, but I can't give
the software to anybody who hasn't agreed to the conditions
On Friday, 14 December 2001 at 6:16:27 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since JFS has come up again... Are there any papers that explain how
to integrate a new filesystem into FreeBSD? The relevant chapter in
the FreeBSD Developers' Handbook (16) is a bit terse :-).
On Wednesday, 12 December 2001 at 1:43:10 -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi,
as i said also before, my intentions were never to cause havoc on
the mailing list. :-)
In simple terms, what i am saying is, the people who would like to
port the JFS file system, should put a +1 in their next
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 1:08:23 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
system calls and NFS server code) would be necessary to make
the journal roll
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 19:42:30 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional issue
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Long-short syndrome in first message.
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 14:01:53 -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
hi all,
this is a wild idea...suggestion...
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 10:56:17 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 17:39:35 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
* Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:02] wrote:
hi all,
this is a wild idea...suggestion...
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:45:22 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
Not unless you have plans. When I was an IBM employee, they would
not change the license, and so it's
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:48:58 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
[ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
than just
On Saturday, 1 December 2001 at 1:21:04 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
I've tried getting information about our (FreeBSD) mail
system by mailing to postmaster but no-one answers..
so, who IS the postmaster at the moment?
I
On Sunday, 2 December 2001 at 17:53:37 +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 1 December 2001 at 13:05:53 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
Hi,
I've got a box which boots up with UDMA33 but during the boot
sequence gets write problems
to ata-dma.c
(provided by Greg Lehey, but I had to do it by hand)
What did you have to do by hand?
so my drive is now running at UDMA 100.
Can you send me dmesg output? In particular, I had a printf output
there to show what the BIOS had set.
Background for other people: Richard has an IDE chip
that
are *all* over the map. However, when connected to a Linux box on the
same network, none of these bad things occur. :(
(And, we've verified the network is up by running ping in another
window.)
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 18:22:10 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 November
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:03:21 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011127 23:08] wrote:
I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
involve FreeBSD. He's just been
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:22:40 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011128 02:14] wrote:
If you want me to shutup and go into a corner, it might make you feel
better, but it certainly won't solve the real problem.
I made it clear that my problem was
I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
involve FreeBSD. He's just been doing some performance testing, and
while the numbers are pretty even (since he discovered soft updates
:-), he's noticing some
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 1:56:14 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:41:18 -0700
Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I'm seeing this as well. However, this appears to be a new
occurance, as we were using a FreeBSD 3.X system for our reference test
platform.
On Sunday, 11 November 2001 at 22:37:58 +0100, Paul van der Zwan wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith wrote:
These cheap controllers don't have any algorithms at all to speak of;
they're just ATA controllers with BIOS code that supposedly understands
striping/mirroring.
There is
On Sunday, 11 November 2001 at 9:33:56 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Mike Smith wrote:
Agreed. I don't think the RAIDs will have the same parameters. Most
of these cheap controllers have fairly simplistic algorithms. Note
that I said guess, though. In my language, that means don't
On Tuesday, 30 October 2001 at 8:26:14 -0800, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I be stumped:
newsfeed-inn# uname -a
FreeBSD newsfeed-inn.meganews.com 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 29
15:08:57 PST 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_4-2001-10-29/src/sys/compile/NEWSFEED-INN
i386
On Saturday, 13 October 2001 at 19:08:24 -0400, Rob wrote:
I am writing this mailing list in a desperate attempt to find out how to
restore my hdd with out loosing all the data on it. Recently I added two
additional hard drives to my freebsd 4.2 system. Once I booted up my system
and dl'ed
On Wednesday, 3 October 2001 at 12:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I suppose it must have been Peter Penchev who wrote:
On Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:14 AM, Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001
On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
Does anyone
On Sunday, 30 September 2001 at 14:55:58 -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010930 14:35] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:23:26PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010930 12:55] wrote:
AIX has SIGDANGER.
Anyone care to tell me how
On Sunday, 16 September 2001 at 20:04:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:04:27 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
Subdisk home.p0.s0:
Size: 40822392320 bytes (38931 MB)
State: up
Plex home.p0 at offset 0 (0 B
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 18:39:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:38:20 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 12:26:10 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Supply
On Monday, 10 September 2001 at 10:11:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to install FreeBSD on a (pseudo-) hardware ATA RAID volume which
consists of two striped ATA disks connected to a Highpoint HPT370
controller.Pseudo- because FreeBSD detects the individual
On Wednesday, 1 August 2001 at 0:17:42 +0700, smail wrote:
Hello freebsd-hackers,
i need some help. my problem is about memory limit in mmap function.
i can't mmap files infinitely, after some number of file mmaped in
memory i've got an error, probably causing memory limit of 2 or 4 Gb.
On Wednesday, 8 August 2001 at 0:27:23 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
void wrote:
Can you name one SMP OS implementation that uses an
interrupt threads approach that doesn't hit a scaling
wall at 4 (or fewer) CPUs, due to heavier weight thread
context switch overhead?
Solaris, if I remember
On Tuesday, 7 August 2001 at 1:58:21 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bosko Milekic wrote:
I keep wondering about the sagicity of running interrupts in
threads... it still seems like an incredibly bad idea to me.
I guess my major problem with this is that by running in
threads, it's made it
On Sunday, 15 July 2001 at 16:51:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
am a kernel newbie. i tried adding code to the kernel
and compiled it and installed . when i tried rebooting
my new image the kernel panics with a fatal trap 12:
page fault ( for which i know the reason). How do i
boot the
On Thursday, 12 July 2001 at 6:58:09 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friends
I have some questions about kernel programming:
You'd be better off sending mail like this to -hackers. I've followed
up there.
1. Why I can call some system calls functions into the kernel but
another
On Sunday, 8 July 2001 at 15:47:18 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Julian Stacey wrote:
The sooner BOD appoint a handfull of non-execs, some nominated by core,
the sooner it'll be easy to encourage Wind River to donate the trademark,
before who knows what might happen at, to, or within Wind
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA is a known text mutilator. You'd be better off getting a
UNIX-based MUA:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
On Wednesday, 20 June 2001 at 11:16:18 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 10:40:50 +0530, Jayesh Krishna wrote:
Hi guys...
I am comfortable with Linux Device Drivers. Presently I am trying
to write some pseudo-drivers in FreeBSD(4.2-Release). I tried out
make_pseudo_driver.sh
in the /usr/share/examples/drivers but it does not work :-(
[redirected to -questions]
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 19:51:05 -0700, Dan Phoenix wrote:
These 2 are from running it on each on the ide drives without vinum.
[root@gorbag /mnt1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=16384k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
16777216000 bytes
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 22:04:34 -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
Any fdc driver gurus in the house?
I have a bunch of old floppy disks with some text files I'd like to
recover. Many of them have errors and are unreadable past a certain point
in the disk. Others I can't read from at
On Friday, 4 May 2001 at 12:58:58 -0400, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
I sent this to -questions a few days ago, but never received
any response, so I thought I'd try here. My apologies if you've
seen this more than once.
I'm also interested in what might be appropriate filesystem
settings
On Wednesday, 18 April 2001 at 23:17:06 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:
You think Intel isn't going to market dual/quad ia64 machines?
Yes, but who'll need them?
If nobody needed them, what would be the point in SELLING
them ?
That's never been an argument
On Saturday, 31 March 2001 at 11:15:37 -0800, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no need to copy the spammer. Did the message bounce, BTW?
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 8EA6A2E8167; Sat, 31
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 0:05:03 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 23:47] wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
[Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
This box averages 30.0 load
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 9:39:36 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
[Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
snip
Average file size is about 4K.
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 17:59:23 -0500, Brandon Gale wrote:
Do you think it'd be worth it to have vinum carp about what may
be a non optimal stripe size?
"Warning N is probably a bad idea for a stripe size, see docs"
Only if it can recognize the fact correctly.
How about even
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 15:15:17 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:16:53PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
No, there's no requirement for it to be a prime number. The only
problem is that with 32 MB cylinder groups and a power of two stripe
size and subdisk count, you end
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 16:38:33 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010327 16:21] wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 17:59:23 -0500, Brandon Gale wrote:
Do you think it'd be worth it to have vinum carp about what may
be a non optimal stripe size?
"Wa
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001 at 1:40:27 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 9:39:36 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
[Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
This box averages 30.0 load with
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:04:16 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
SWAP is never touched. :)
last pid: 23395; load averages: 2.08, 2.92, 3.60up 0+01:29:58 02:03:27
1529 processes:24 running, 1505 sleeping
CPU states: 40.5% user, 0.0% nice, 46.4% system, 1.1% interrupt, 12.0% idle
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
[Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
snip
Average file size is about 4K. /home/bbsusers* is on a vinum
stripe'd volume with 3 Ultra160 9G 1RPM
On Monday, 5 March 2001 at 17:23:53 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I can't understand is the reference to missing support for large
file sizes - as far as I know, that's one of FreeBSD's strengths! Anybody
care to guess what they mean
On Thursday, 22 February 2001 at 13:55:07 -0800, Jim Pirzyk wrote:
I have a question on how to debug Linux binaries. I have a core
file from the linux binary, but if I use the FreeBSD gdb, it cannot
find the shared libraries in /compat/linux/ If I use the /compat/linux/
/usr/bin/gdb,
On Monday, 12 February 2001 at 15:29:17 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i've been doing some experiments with vinum, and doing a make buildworld
(with obj on the same vinum)
without soft-updates~ 1 hour
with soft-updates ~ 40
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:41:29 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
btw ccd requires 2 other drives am i correct?
No, you can use ccd with only 2 drives.
So i just remove /var/ basically from fstab ...raid0 2 drives together
and mount that as var...is my basic understanding.
of course of
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:31:26 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
In anycase, while VINUM is great for striping disks I recommend that
you use CCD to begin with, because CCD is a whole lot less complex.
You can stripe IDE drives but the two drives must be on different IDE
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:16:44 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:13:57PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010206 12:07] wrote:
Does sendmail even use fsync()?
It better. :)
Quick
On Friday, 2 February 2001 at 20:10:10 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 78, 0 Dec 31 1969 pci
This one may appear harmless, but it is not. It is trivially easy to create
an alignment fault (fatal on an alpha) with the userland pciconf
On Sunday, 28 January 2001 at 21:10:34 -0700, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
I am sorry I brought this up without a URL :-(
I'm working on it.
Garrett Rooney already posted it: http://www.ccrc.wustl.edu/pub/chuck
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address
On Friday, 26 January 2001 at 9:47:38 -0500, Jim Sander wrote:
Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they think something is
wrong with the card.
Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD
These cards work well in our many 3.x and 4.x systems.
But I just built up a
On Thursday, 25 January 2001 at 12:54:17 -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:12:42PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
At 10:58 PM 01/24/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
I'll look into the Linux driver, however, and
On Thursday, 25 January 2001 at 22:03:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey guys i know you probably get this question all the time but i am looking
into getting into doing somekernel hacking first i will tell you some thing i
have assumed about it:
1.) you should know atleast more
On Wednesday, 24 January 2001 at 17:08:16 -0500, Dennis wrote:
I'll look into the Linux driver, however, and see if it has anything
useful in it. Historically the Linux Pro/100+ driver has totally sucked and
was chalk-full of magic numbers being anded and ored.
That's "chock full", and
On Wednesday, 24 January 2001 at 21:07:45 -0800, Matt Jacob wrote:
I've come in in the middle of this discussion, so maybe there's
something I don't know, but on the same hardware and running FreeBSD,
I had no problems. Why should we want to replace the driver with
something which doesn't
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
That fat little penguin is everywhere.
The main reason we practically don't see beastie at all is that
there is no artwork to get hold of anywhere...
Please,
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 8:41:51 -0800, Richard Hodges wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
That fat little penguin is everywhere.
The main reason we practically don't see beastie at all is that
there is no
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 16:00:55 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
That fat little penguin is everywhere.
The main reason we
On Monday, 8 January 2001 at 10:04:44 +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote:
* Roman Shterenzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010107 10:24] wrote:
Hi,
Could you please take a look at :
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24019
It's my friend's PR. Can you give me some hints on how can I debug this
On Monday, 8 January 2001 at 0:22:01 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
Hi all
Is their a group of FreeBSD Enthusiasts that are working on porting
free to embedded controllers that are not x86 I am in the process of
developing a security / access / building management system, and am
looking at
[following up to -hackers]
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 14:35:39 -0500, Jeff Fellin wrote:
I previous sent this mail on freebsd-current, but realize it
was probably an incorrect list. So, I am reposting on to
freebsd-questions. If this is still the wrong list could
someone tell me the best
out which code it is executing
(with remote debugging or ddb)?
kld debugging is a bit tricky. Take a look at the debugging macros and
bits that Greg Lehey put together for vinum for a starting point. You have
to calculate the appropriate offset to get to the KLD code in gdb.
Doug Rabson has
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
(with remote debugging or ddb)?
kld debugging is a bit tricky. Take a look at the debugging macros and
bits that Greg Lehey put together for vinum for a starting point. You have
to calculate the appropriate offset to get
On Thursday, 28 December 2000 at 14:03:31 +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:30:09PM -0500, David E. Cross wrote:
I have run across a problem since updating to -STABLE a week or so ago...
my CVS vinum partition would go corrupt after a few updates. I have been
running
On Tuesday, 26 December 2000 at 17:30:09 -0500, David E. Cross wrote:
I have run across a problem since updating to -STABLE a week or so ago...
my CVS vinum partition would go corrupt after a few updates. I have been
running with no softupdates on my system for a day now and no problems.
Has
On Tuesday, 19 December 2000 at 16:01:52 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:11:12PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
/* Case 1 */ /* Case 2 */
if (data) vs. free(data)
free(data);
Actually from an
On Friday, 8 December 2000 at 18:29:26 -0600, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Is there some simple one-liner command that allows me to display the values of
all the variables within the current stack frame?
info local
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for
[redirected to -questions; I don't consider this an in-depth technical
question]
On Wednesday, 29 November 2000 at 21:03:10 +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
[Posted this to questions too, but no one appeared to know.. maybe someone
here does?]
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE on a server
On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 16:32:49 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
I am looking for info on programing in kernel land. System calls, howto's
etc. I have not found anything that realy covers this stuff any and all
help would be welcomed!
The system calls are described in section 2 of the
On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 21:14:25 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 16:32:49 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
I am looking for info on programing in kernel land. System calls, howto's
etc. I have not found anything that realy covers this stuff any and all
help
On Wednesday, 15 November 2000 at 10:08:45 +, visi0n wrote:
The THC have a documentation about freebsd kernel space.
packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/bsdkern.htm
Repeating the full URL for the benefit of mutt users, this is
On Tuesday, 24 October 2000 at 7:37:12 -0400, Christopher Harrer wrote:
Hello All,
Is there a way to determine which CPU I'm currently executing on in a SMP
box? I've found references to proc-p_oncpu, but I'm not sure if this is
the best way to determine where I'm executing. I'd like to
On Sunday, 15 October 2000 at 13:58:15 +0200, Frank Nobis wrote:
Hi,
I have a IDE drive spitting out this messages:
ad3: UDMA ICRC WRITE ERROR blk# 48562489 retrying
ad3: UDMA ICRC READ ERROR blk# 24576329 retrying
ad3: UDMA ICRC WRITE ERROR blk# 69108025 retrying
ad3: UDMA ICRC WRITE
On Tuesday, 10 October 2000 at 0:35:07 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
Well, you obviously need two keyboards and two mice. I can't think of
a case where that would be useful, but with x2x (in the Ports
collection) you can allow different people
On Tuesday, 10 October 2000 at 0:51:50 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
I had a PC with two graphics cards long before that. It was
relatively common to have a machine with both CGA and MDA, and there
were some debuggers which would handle both
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
