With respect to AIO... we run a data server which multiplexes
on the select() function, and uses AIO to do all it's I/O. This
has been a very stable system.
system : 4.0-19990827-SNAP
start time : 1999/12/24 11:14:44
up time (days hh:mm:ss): 12 13:32:53
Hi,
I'm thinking about buying a digital camera, but of course it
has to be usable from my FreeBSD box (-current). In looking at
the Kodak series, they seem to support the PCMCIA-ATA standard.
So, instead of communicating directly with the camera, I was
thinking about purchasing a reader
Hi,
I'm working on wine on a 4.0-19990827-SNAP system.
The application I have calls WriteFile(), in files/file.c, line
1145. The write() call is failing with:
WriteFile: File too large[27]
Note: I added the fprintf() to show the above...
Well, this is happenning on filedesc 14, so for
Well, another code fragment might be useful:
/*--+
| Set up iocb for aio_write() call |
+--*/
memset(iocb, 0,
, Aug 24, 1999 at 04:25:26PM -0400, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
The subject says it all... We have some code that scans files
backwards...
In looking through /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c I can't see
where we do any validation on the resulting seek location... Do the
appropriate
Hi,
The subject says it all... We have some code that scans files
backwards... On the systems we've been running this program on, the
lseek man page typically lists:
[EINVAL] The resulting file offset would be negative.
The following program run under freebsd-current shows
Hi,
The subject says it all... We have some code that scans files
backwards... On the systems we've been running this program on, the
lseek man page typically lists:
[EINVAL] The resulting file offset would be negative.
The following program run under freebsd-current shows
Hi,
I like this approach. I have a number of often spawned daemon
processes that could benefit from this. One of the last process
we debugged where we had unwanted open filedescriptors was in
programs invoked by the cvs loginfo script.
For naming convention considerations, I might suggest
Hi,
I like this approach. I have a number of often spawned daemon
processes that could benefit from this. One of the last process
we debugged where we had unwanted open filedescriptors was in
programs invoked by the cvs loginfo script.
For naming convention considerations, I might suggest
Hi,
Thanks for the reply(s)... If I understand you correctly, then:
%route -n get netapp01
route to: 192.168.21.52
destination: 192.168.21.52
interface: fxp1
flags: UP,HOST,DONE,LLINFO,WASCLONED
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar hopcount mtu expire
Hi,
I'm trying to dynamically determine the tcp windowsize. Sysctl
has the following to say, but the name/value pairs are not
documented.
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323: 0
net.inet.tcp.rfc1644: 0
net.inet.tcp.mssdflt: 512
net.inet.tcp.rttdflt: 3
net.inet.tcp.keepidle: 14400
net.inet.tcp.keepintvl: 150
Hi,
I'm trying to dynamically determine the tcp windowsize. Sysctl
has the following to say, but the name/value pairs are not
documented.
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323: 0
net.inet.tcp.rfc1644: 0
net.inet.tcp.mssdflt: 512
net.inet.tcp.rttdflt: 3
net.inet.tcp.keepidle: 14400
net.inet.tcp.keepintvl: 150
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
Some example output follows along with the program. This is being
run on a -current system. If I open a file on fd
Hi,
Running -current...
I'm trying to verify SIGFPE handling and am finding some
interesting issues. In the following test program, a divide
by zero is done and the SIGFPE delivered.
$ ./fp
sig == 8
code== 0
z has the value 1.00
It seems that from machine/trap.h the value of
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
Some example output follows along with the program. This is being
run on a -current system. If I open a file on fd
Hi,
Running -current...
I'm trying to verify SIGFPE handling and am finding some
interesting issues. In the following test program, a divide
by zero is done and the SIGFPE delivered.
$ ./fp
sig == 8
code== 0
z has the value 1.00
It seems that from machine/trap.h the value of code
Ahhh.. RACF... MVS... Music to my ears...
And speaking of resource managers... don't forget
the ESM on CMS for SFS... :-)
I would have spared the bandwidth.. but it's worth noting
that we run a production system that installs user exits into
the Shared File System on CMS via the Callable
Hi,
I have an administration problem that I'm trying to solve and
I'm looking for comments and ideas.
I have about 6000 users in the passwd file. We have a number
of compute servers available to these users which (the boss)
wants to have allocated according to where the users home
Hi,
I too see this type of failure until I can download the appropriate
distfiles into /usr/ports/distfiles...
The file /etc/resolv.conf is copied from /etc to the chroot
area and is probably ok. I typically find that my upstream
domain name server is not responding correctly when this
Hi,
We're seeing the following message on one of the drives we have
mounted in a server system.
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 46 aa 50 0 0 40 0
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): RECOVERED ERROR info:46aa77 asc:18,7
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): Recovered data with ECC - data rewritten
20 matches
Mail list logo
