On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 5:21, Łukasz P wrote:
Hello,
Please let me know if anyone is up to fix fuse on FreeBSD 9.x ?
Particularly this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
I'm willing to pay for the fix.
I
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:34, Mark Felder wrote:
I think the fix is the new from-scratch fuse module in FreeBSD 10,
which in my experience works flawlessly. Perhaps you should instead see
if someone is willing to backport that fuse module to 9.x?
Well actually the description
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 7:08, Łukasz P wrote:
Thank you - I'll give it a try today.
Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable?
Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system have you used?
My main use case these days is ntfs-3g, and I no longer get panics when
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 9:54, Patrick Dung wrote:
1) Perl version change within Major release
If I remembered correctly, FreeBSD 9.0 shipped with perl 5.12 packages in
the DVD.
But in FreeBSD 9.1, Perl 5.14 is shipped.
I think Perl version should be consistent in the FreeBSD 9 series.
The
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 10:34, Mark Felder wrote:
After the EoL of FreeBSD 8 (estimated June 30, 2015) the old package
tools are scheduled to be removed from FreeBSD. This change will be
MFC'd back to 9-STABLE and the release at that time (perhaps
9.4-RELEASE?) will not have the old pkg_
Virtualbox is very aggressive about caching writes. This is how it
achieves its perceived speed. I wouldn't expect to see this happen on
real hardware. I might have to try this out though and see if I can
reproduce it reliably.
___
I've been under the impression that synproxy was broken for quite some
time, but I know there has been a lot of work on pf in HEAD so I can't
be sure where it might stand there. Can anyone confirm/deny this?
And not to discourage you, but the pf documentation does say Routine
use of this option
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 06:45:46 -0500, Aryeh Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a program I am making a port for that also requires a
/usr/local/etc/rc.d script is there anywhere I can find documentation
on how write one and/or a template file to follow?
Start with another
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:26:43 -0600, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
So we have to take your word for it?
Provide a link if you're going to make assertions, or they're no more
than
your own opinion.
I've heard this same thing -- every vdev == 1 drive in performance. I've
never seen
Hi all,
At work we have several standalone webservers with lots of IPs... let's
say x.x.x.100 - 200. That's a LOT of ifconfig_IF_alias0, alias1,
alias2... to maintain, and it's also painful when we need to move an IP
to a different server which happens occasionally. The right solution for
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:12:17 -0600, Karim Fodil-Lemelin
fodillemlinka...@gmail.com wrote:
SAS controllers may connect to SATA devices, either directly connected
using native SATA protocol or through SAS expanders using SATA Tunneled
Protocol (STP).
The systems is currently put in place
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:12:14 -0600, Karim Fodil-Lemelin
fodillemlinka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm struggling getting FreeBSD 9.1 properly work on an IBM blade server
(HS22). Here is a dd output from Linux CentOS vs FreeBSD 9.1.
GNU dd is heavily buffered unless you tell it not to be.
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:00:40 -0500, guy.hel...@gmail.com wrote:
Sep 21 02:14:55 backups kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 5
ee 60 16 0 1 0 0
Sep 21 02:14:55 backups kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): CAM status: SCSI
Status Error
Sep 21 02:14:55 backups kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): SCSI
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:37:40 -0500, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org
wrote:
How do you have suj on 8.3 ? Are you using a patch ?
I don't have suj on 8.3
Also can you retest 9 with the following
sysctlkern.timecounter.hardware=Acpi-fast
Yes, I'll attempt that as soon as possible. We're
Hi Mark,
Here's the output of our VMs running on ESXi 4.1u1
FreeBSD 7.4:
# sysctl kern.timecounter.choice
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(800) ACPI-safe(850) i8254(0) dummy(-100)
# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware
kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-safe
FreeBSD 8.3:
# sysctl
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:20:26 -0500, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Are you still seeing this, and if so can you get a crashdump? Also, I'm
curious if you only see this with SUJ or if plain UFS+SU works fine?
The crash on demand right now is producable on 8.x and 9.x, so SUJ isn't a
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:11:28 -0500, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Just curious - does VMWare provide a remote debugger support (gdb stub)?
I'm not aware of one. What I have been able to successfully do is break
into the debugger during the hang but the info I've posted so far has not
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:28:15 -0500, Kurt Lidl l...@pix.net wrote:
Isn't this what you want?
http://stackframe.blogspot.com/2007/04/debugging-linux-kernels-with.html
-Kurt
Interesting -- it looks like that's an option on ESX as well. The only
question is: what do I do with that? It's going
Changing timer source has not been tested. It doesn't crash in 7.x, so did
something timer related change in 8.x?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:05:42 -0500, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Using a third-party's name servers is not an option
And how can you trust that your port 53 TCP/UDP traffic isn't being
redirected and you're talking to the real root servers? I think you're
being a bit too paranoid...
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:51:25 -0500, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
AFAIK, no
operating system has a stub resolver the capability to validate DNSSEC.
Yeah, I was sort of hinting at that :-)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:39:34 -0500, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect. Times have
changed.
Agreed; if we need DNS in base (really, why?) then unbound+nsd are prime
candidates, but they're healthily maintained in
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:39:34 -0500, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
I'm willing to import and maintain unbound (BSD-licensed validating,
recursive, and caching DNS resolver) if you remove BIND.
My only issue is that unbound is still a relatively young project
(released 2007) and
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:37:11 -0500, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm
hesitant to encourage the use of this as I do think putting GPT inside
of a
gmirror violates the GPT spec.
I personally think this use case is a bit ... odd, anyway.
I have only request to those that manage
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:38:01 -0500, Atte Peltomäki atte.peltom...@iki.fi
wrote:
If it's any consolation, I've used other brand KVM switches as well and
the only one I've found quite reliable were Raritan and those cost an
arm and a leg.
raritan userstation $65.00
Have you proven beyond reasonable doubt that there is no filesystem
corruption or silent filesystem corruption due to bad hardware?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:14:09 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
As this KVM have PS/2 connectors to keyboard and mouse i added USB to
dual-PS/2 converter.
http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=PS2-to-USB+adapters
You probably have a ps/2 converter that's known
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:27:09 -0500, Fernando Apesteguía
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in embedded systems, boot time is an important factor.
If you're designing a very specific embedded product based on FreeBSD why
aren't you writing your own startup system? Why would anyone
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:49:18 -0500, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
I for one, as a fbsd admin on corporate servers ( read not commiter),
would dearly like less releases but a more aggressive MFC approach.
Less releases such as less frequent MAJOR releases (7.0, 8.0, 9.0...) or
less
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:23:11 -0500, Dieter BSD dieter...@engineer.com
wrote:
Replacing perfectly good components simply because they
are GPL. The purpose of BSD is supposed to be creating a
great OS, not providing software hoarders with a supply
of free code to abuse.
You realize that
They have a lot of manpower and can spend a lot of time replacing the boot
subsystems and all startup scripts every 2 releases. For FreeBSD it's not
a big issue as most people don't reboot often. If it's an itch you want to
scratch you're more than welcome to look into it; that seems to be
Hi guys I'm excitedly posting this from my phone. Good news for you guys, bad
news for us -- we were building HA storage on vmware for a client and can now
replicate the crash on demand. I'll be posting details when I get home to my PC
tonight, but this hopefully is enough to replicate the
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:49:18 -0500, Florian Smeets f...@freebsd.org wrote:
As far as i understand it does at least enable usage of pages up to 4MB,
perhaps someone should teach mysql about the FreeBSD's limits?
If you look at the output i sent, it certainly changes from using no
superpage
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:51:50 -0500, Daniel O'Connor
docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
ISTR someone on the lists was talking about a device by http://i-odd.com
which does what you want.
I found http://renosite.com/ which is a home brew version of the same
basic idea.
Zalman ZM-VE200 and
[/usr/home/feld]# python spsurvey.py
last pid: 54743; load averages: 0.28, 0.26, 0.24 up 18+07:41:02
16:22:45
145 processes: 1 running, 144 sleeping
Mem: 828M Active, 845M Inact, 8517M Wired, 174M Cache, 725M Buf, 265M Free
Swap: 4096M Total, 88M Used, 4008M Free, 2% Inuse
Total
So when this hang happens, there never is a real panic. It just sits in a
state which I describe as like being in a deadlock. How would I go about
getting a crashdump if it never panics? Is it possible to do the dump over
a network or something because I don't believe it can write through
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:06:13 -0500, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Do you only have one CPU in this VM? If not, do you know which threads
the other CPUs were running (e.g. do you have ps7.png, etc.)?
correct, only one CPU in the VM
___
On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:17:07 -0500, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Humm, can you test it with 2 CPUs?
We primarily only run with 1 CPU. We have seen it crash on multiple CPU
VMs. Also, Dane Foster appeared to have been using multiple CPUs in his
video transcoding VMs.
On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:46:23 -0500, y...@rawbw.com wrote:
After the recent system upgrade that brought nvidia-driver-295.49 my
system began to malfunction.
Xorg randomly freezes and gets to 100% CPU (in kde4), switching back
from the black terminal takes 30 seconds, some windows don't
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:30:40 -0500, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi,
can you please, -please- file a PR? And place all of the above
information in it so we don't lose it?
I'd be glad to post a PR and assist in helping to get it permanently
fixed. I certainly don't want this
OK guys I've been talking with another user who can recreate this crash
and the last bit of information we've learned seems to be leaning towards
interrupts/IRQ issues like someone (bz@ perhaps?) suggested.
I'm still trying to test this myself, but the other user was able to
recreate my
On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:01:19 -0500, Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com
wrote:
You could try switching mpt to MSI. MSI interrupts are never shared.
Add this to /boot/device.hints:
hint.mpt.0.msi_enable=1
Currently implementing this on the known crashy servers. I've been looking
Quick update:
I have received word last night that this crash has been consistently
happening to someone on FreeBSD 9 and they're looking for more ideas. I
changed the following 41 days ago:
- Video memory to auto if it wasn't already
- SCSI controller changed from LSI Logic Parallel to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:04:10 -0500, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote:
no, I can't recreate it, could you?
We haven't seen this problem since FreeBSD 6.x. I can't recall how
reproducible it was.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:11:25 -0500, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote:
Hi All
There was some mention before that time stops under vmware, and now it's
happened
to me :-)
the clock stopped now, the system is responsive, but eg
sleep 1
never finishes.
Is there a solution?
btw,
Guys,
The crash on my machine with debugging has evaded me for a few days. I'm
still looking for further suggestions of things I should grab from the DDB
when it happens again.
Thanks for the help everyone!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:54 -0500, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
There's no guarantee that upgarding a VM or rebooting it won't change
the config of said VM. Don't forget to diff the vm config file..
I'm not sure how this would be accomplished Am I supposed to be
running
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:44:47 -0500, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
Have you migrated these hosts, or were they installed in-place and
never moved?
fwiw the apparent integrity of things on the VM is consistent with
our experience too.
VMMotion and StorageVMMotion does not seem to affect
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:53:10 -0500, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
On the same vmdk files? Deleting the VM makes it sound like not.
Fresh new VMDK files every time, and always thick provisioned.
None of the other VM's, even the VM's that had been abused in this
horribly insensitive
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:31:38 -0500, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
* have you filed a PR?
No
* is the crash easily reproducable?
Unfortunately not. It's totally random. Some servers will get the bug
and crash daily, some will crash weekly, some might seem to be fine but 3
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:36:49 -0500, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
As much as I'm sensitive to your production requirements, realistically
it's not likely that you'll get a helpful result without testing a newer
version. 8.2 came out over a year ago, many many things have changed
since
Alright, new data. It happened to crash about 10 minutes after I came in
this morning and I ran some stuff in the DDB. I have no idea what
information is useful, but perhaps someone will see something out of the
ordinary?
http://feld.me/freebsd/esx_crash/
Thanks...
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:58:16 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
wrote:
Do both 32- and 64-bit versions of FreeBSD crash?
Correct, we see both i386 and amd64 flavors crash in the same way.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:31:24 -0500, Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com
wrote:
Don't know about ESXi but on others VM Managers i can change the chipset
emulation from ICH10 to ICH4. Can you change it to an older chipset too?
Unfortunately there's no setting in the GUI for that but I'll keep
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:55:36 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
wrote:
It almost sounds like the lost interrupt issue I've seen with USB EHCI
devices, though disk I/O should have a retry timeout?
What does wmstat -i output?
--HPS
Here's a server that has a week uptime and is due
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:49:30 -0500, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
I explained it at the time to one of my VMware friends:
This is 100% identical to what we see, Joe! And we're so unlucky that we
have this happen on probably a dozen servers, but a handful are the really
bad ones.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:05:30 -0500, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com
wrote:
If this is an interrupt problem with disk i/o, then you might want to
look into (DDB(4))
show intr
show intrcount
maybe
show allrman
Thank you! I really don't know what things we should be running in DDB to
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:24:30 -0500, je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I just started reading this tread, but I am wondering if I missed
something here. What does this have to do with Windows 7?
I emailed him off-list but I'm guessing he thought this was on VMWare
Workstation or another product
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:53:02 -0500, Alan Cox alan.l@gmail.com wrote:
Not so long ago, VMware implemented a clever scheme for reducing the
overhead of virtualized interrupts that must be delivered by at least
some
(if not all) of their emulated storage controllers:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:53:49 -0500, Dieter BSD dieter...@engineer.com
wrote:
FreeBSD ?? - 7.4 never crash
FreeBSD 8.0 - 8.2 crashes
Obvious short term workaround is to run production on 7.4 (assuming you
can)
until you figure out what is wrong with 8.x.
We're moving our most critical
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:53:52 -0500, Adam Vande More
amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't VMWare offer different types of emulated disk controllers? If
so,
that might be the easiest way to narrow the field. Another thing maybe
to
try would be to backport the mpt
Yes, they offer
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:27:31 -0500, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
It also doesn't explain the experience here, where one VM basically
crapped out but only after a migration - and then stayed crapped out.
It would be interesting to hear about your datastore, how busy it is,
what technology,
Alright guys, I'm at the end of my rope here. For those that haven't seen
my previous emails here's the (not so) quick breakdown:
Overview:
FreeBSD ?? - 7.4 never crash
FreeBSD 8.0 - 8.2 crashes
FreeBSD 8-STABLE, 8.3, and 9.0 are untested (Sorry, not possible in our
production at this time,
As an alternative I recently purchased a Zalman ZM-VE200 device (there's
also a USB3.0 flavor) that lets you copy ISOs to it and it will emulate a
CDROM/DVDROM/BDROM for you so you never have to deal with this mess again.
It works amazingly well. I was tired of fighting this problem and this
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:46:45 -0600, John Kozubik j...@kozubik.com wrote:
And as long as we're repeating ... :)
Since 9.0 is already out of the bag, I think a decent approach would be
to fizzle out 8.x on the current timeline/trajectory (maybe 8.4 in 6-8
months, and maybe 8.5 in a year or
Why is everyone so afraid of running -STABLE? Plenty of stuff gets MFC'd.
Yeah, I agree -- running -RELEASE is difficult. Hell, it's frustrating to
us that VMWare only supports -RELEASE and it took until ESX 5 to
officially support 8.2!
More releases / snapshots of -STABLE helps people on
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:30:20 -0600, Atom Smasher a...@smasher.org wrote:
linux is, in fact, an operating system.
debian, red hat, ubuntu, gentoo, etc are distributions of that OS.
It's not really worth getting into this argument, but I'll reiterate that
no, it's not an OS -- it's a kernel.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:59:44 -0600, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 1/17/12 9:36 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
having run -stable on production systems, the way to do it is:
* follow -stable..
* pick a time that IN RETROSPECT (from 1 month later) looks as though it
was good.
*
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:12 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller
fulle...@over-yonder.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:50:08PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Mark Felder, and lo! it spake thus:
I've seen several other things hit -STABLE right after the freeze
ended early January which surprise me
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:07:56 -0600, Atom Smasher a...@smasher.org wrote:
and how many corps are running openBSD?
Works amazingly well as an edge router. You get pf, openbgpd, openspfd
much higher performance that 50K cisco gear. The bugs we've hit have been
fixed promptly as well.
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:23:46 -0600, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
It is an unexpected behavior and the flag should be set on all
interfaces. Can you send me your /etc/rc.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, and
the result of ifconfig -a?
Back at work so I have access to the machine again:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:24 -0600, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
re0 seems to have ACCEPT_RTADV. What is the problem?
That's because I haven't rebooted
Let's start fresh.
The normal ipv6 configuration anyone would use:
-ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES in rc.conf
-NO mention
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:56:47 -0600, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is an expected behavior. ACCEPT_RTADV is disabled by default on
9.X.
Thanks for clarifying. I'll make sure I update our documentation at work
regarding how exactly to get ACCEPT_RTADV working so this is
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Is it correct that ACCEPT_RTADV option was enabled on the vboxnet0
and not on re0, even after setting net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to 1 at
boot time and ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES?
-- Hiroki
Yes, that is the behavior I witnessed.
Hi guys,
I upgraded my desktop at work just around christmas to 9-PRERELEASE builds
and ipv6 has been broken since then. I've been too busy at work to fix it
but today I finally had the chance to figure it out.
Currently I'm running:
12:11:15 tech304:~ uname -a
FreeBSD
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:49:45 -0600, Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com
wrote:
You mean ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES ?
Yes... Unfortunately that's what I get for typing it manually and being
distracted at the time. :-)
What is in your rc.conf? Do you have inet6 accept_rtadv keyword
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:28:37 -0500, Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk
wrote:
Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying
adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use?
Yes. :-)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:42:22 -0500, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
+1 useful.
I'd like to see this committed.
Agreed.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only extra quirk that said commit
does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in
critical performance path.
It's really not my place to say, but it seems strange that if an
optimization
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:37:00 -0600, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
wrote:
1) switching to a differnt tty worked, but i couldn't log in (input was
simply
ignored)
I don't mean to derail this thread if this is completely unrelated, but
we've been having issues with FreeBSD 8.0 and
80 matches
Mail list logo
