On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:27PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spörlein, and lo! it spake thus:
I have a .hg directory sitting in / for every machine I usually take
care of. hgignore is of course set to *, so only explicitly added files
are tracked.
I do pretty much the same thing
On Friday 23 April 2010 2:50:15 am Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:27PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spörlein, and lo! it spake thus:
I have a .hg directory sitting in / for every machine I usually take
care of. hgignore is of course set to *, so only
Sergey Babkin bab...@verizon.net writes:
I wonder if a version control system, like SVN, could be used to keep
track of all the changes in /etc. (Or maybe it already is and I'm
simply out of date).
arch is commonly used for things like this.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Thu, 22.04.2010 at 12:18:21 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Sergey Babkin bab...@verizon.net writes:
I wonder if a version control system, like SVN, could be used to keep
track of all the changes in /etc. (Or maybe it already is and I'm
simply out of date).
arch is commonly used for
On Thu, 22.04.2010 at 12:10:50 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:41:27 +0200
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
On Thu, 22.04.2010 at 12:18:21 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Sergey Babkin bab...@verizon.net writes:
I wonder if a version control system, like
Doug Barton wrote:
On 4/20/2010 11:30 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
My suggestion was in the context of upgrding a system to a
new release. There are changes to /**/etc/**/*(.) files going
from release R to R+1. I was pointing out that what
mergemaster does (merging in these changes to your
?
Basically a three way merge is exactly what we want for /etc,
right? cvs because it is in the base system. I used to
maintain /etc changes in cvs and that was useful in keeping
track of configuration changes on shared machines.
By the way, I've been storing my configuration in CVS for a long
On 4/20/2010 11:30 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
My suggestion was in the context of upgrding a system to a
new release. There are changes to /**/etc/**/*(.) files going
from release R to R+1. I was pointing out that what
mergemaster does (merging in these changes to your locally
modified etc
Hi Bakul,
Sorry for the late reply, I'm lagging behind in my FreeBSD mailbox :).
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:57:48AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
But I wonder... why not build something like this around cvs?
Basically a three way merge is exactly what we want for /etc,
right? cvs because
9 matches
Mail list logo
