[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA is a known text mutilator. You'd be better off getting a
UNIX-based MUA:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
On Wednesday, 20 June 2001 at 11:16:18 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the BSD license for ya.
There needs to be a license that says something to the
effect of Anyone
can use/buy/sell/modify/distribute this software with or
without source code except Microsoft.
Why? I'd personally be happy if Microsoft
FYA.
Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp.asp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Monday 18 June 2001 18:45, Hal Snyder wrote:
FYA.
Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft
Windows® 2000 Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp
.asp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey M. Reed
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Hal Snyder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone see todays Wall Street Journal article: Microsoft
Using Free Software (or something to that effect)
On Monday 18 June 2001 18:45, Hal Snyder wrote:
FYA.
Migrating Microsoft
* Jeffrey M. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 19:01] wrote:
On Monday 18 June 2001 18:45, Hal Snyder wrote:
FYA.
Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft
Windows® 2000 Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp
.asp
To
that i can hear.
hehehhehehhe.
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 21:42, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
From: Jeremiah Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Anyone see todays Wall Street Journal
article: Microsoft Using Free Software (or something to
that effect) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:03:46 +1000
That's
While I didn't read the article (I saw it when someone was reading
the opposite page on the subway today), I thought it might make
for some interesting conversation and views on the list. I will
try and get a URL for you all to look at later. Thanks.
-- Jonathan
--
Jonathan M. Slivko [EMAIL
Jonathan Slivko wrote:
While I didn't read the article (I saw it when someone was reading
the opposite page on the subway today), I thought it might make
for some interesting conversation and views on the list. I will
try and get a URL for you all to look at later. Thanks.
-- Jonathan
Like I posted eariler..
http://public.wsj.com/news/hmc/sb992819157437237260.htm
Regards
Ak
While I didn't read the article (I saw it when someone was reading
the opposite page on the subway today), I thought it might make
for some interesting conversation and views on the list. I will
As I understand the BSD license anyone can use it, however, they must say
that they are using it, no? So if MS is using TCP/IP code (or any other
code from FreeBSD), are they not in violation of the license by not
including such a clause in their license or documentation? What am I
missing
+ Matthew Hagerty wrote:
| As I understand the BSD license anyone can use it, however, they must say
| that they are using it, no? So if MS is using TCP/IP code (or any other
| code from FreeBSD), are they not in violation of the license by not
| including such a clause in their license
From: Matthew Hagerty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone see todays Wall Street Journal article: Microsoft Using Free
Software (or something to that effect)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:43:24 -0400
As I understand the BSD license anyone can use it, however, they must say
that they are using
13 matches
Mail list logo
