Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jonas Luster
-- 06/01/01 21:44 -0800 - Jeremiah Gowdy Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap: Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is redefining the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. free (fr) adj.

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is redefining the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. You're saying the most common definition of "free" isn't no cost ?

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
[ The dict command is your friend ] 1. Exempt from subjection to the will of others; not under restraint, control, or compulsion; able to follow one's own impulses, desires, or inclinations; determining one's own course of action; not dependent; at liberty.

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Wes Peters
Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is redefining the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. You're saying the most common

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-06 Thread Brian F. Feldman
"Jeremiah Gowdy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uuuuh, I'm gonna have to agree with Murray that there is a complete dearth of free software for Windows. Go search shareware.com, or Tucows, or any of the other Windows-centric software sites, and just TRY to find most of the same tools or

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-06 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
What's so "free" about software that you don't pay money for? Pretty much nothing compared to software that you are /free/ to modify and /free/ to use any way you want is "free". There is very little of that for Windows compared to for Unix in general. Okay, this levels of "free" concept

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-28 Thread mouss
At 17:07 28/12/00 -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: If you slant your judgement so far against the other products, it makes you sound like you don't know what you're talking about (no offense). You need to point out the pros and cons of ALL three

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-28 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
Uuuuh, I'm gonna have to agree with Murray that there is a complete dearth of free software for Windows. Go search shareware.com, or Tucows, or any of the other Windows-centric software sites, and just TRY to find most of the same tools or applications you take for granted on your Unix box.

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-27 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
The current work in progress is available at : http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/ Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, - Murray Okay, I read your page and printed it out, and went over it a few times. A couple of things bothered me, but for the most part I