On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
Hmm, let's see:
Assignee: Digital Equipment Corporation (Maynard, MA)
Appl. No.: 646734
Filed: May 3, 1996
Versus:
* Derived from hp300 version by Mike Hibler, this version by William
*
Quoth Poul-Henning Kamp on Wed, Jun 13, 2001:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes:
From: Bill Vermillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We just need to hide all the code from the lawyers.
Why? They wouldn't understand it anyway. What we really need to do
is stop HIRING them. :)
Patents don't always require licensing. Ever Unix system extant
has a patented piece in it [or perhaps HAD is more appropriate]
as the patents had expired.
I saw the copy of it years ago and I looked for it recently but
can't figure out where it is.
The permissions - the old -rwx- etc we are
From: Bill Vermillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patented algorithm in FreeBSD
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:45:46 -0400
We just need to hide all the code from the lawyers.
Why? They wouldn't understand it anyway. What we really need to do
is stop HIRING them. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes:
From: Bill Vermillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patented algorithm in FreeBSD
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:45:46 -0400
We just need to hide all the code from the lawyers.
Why? They wouldn't understand it anyway. What we really need to do
Today Jordan Hubbard wrote:
From: Bill Vermillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patented algorithm in FreeBSD
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:45:46 -0400
We just need to hide all the code from the lawyers.
Why? They wouldn't understand it anyway. What we really need to do
is stop HIRING
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith writes:
Hi
Go to http://www.uspto.gov/patft/, search for patent number 5873127, and
you will find the description of mapping page table entries into virtual
memory via one page directory entry pointing to the page directory itself
- exactly what
The key thing with patents is that they are meaningless until the
patent holder decides to protect them in court by challenging the
people who are supposedly in violation of the patent. If a patent
holder decides to go after you, it can be costly even if you win.
They can't
This whole thread is kind of silly. Don't people realize the sheer
number of patent infringments there are in FreeBSD (or, indeed,
Linux?) Sure, you could add a flag to turn each and every instance of
such patent infringment off but the end-result would be something that
didn't even resemble an
In message 30671.992330850@critter Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: Well, the application date is what counts, and that's mar1992, but I'm
: pretty sure that Bill Jolitz had them beat to that date already...
I'm pretty sure that VMS 3.x used a similar technique. I have my old
VMS internals docs from
In a message dated 06/11/2001 7:02:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, you are very safe in using this technique, for a variety of reasons:
- The patent is almost certainly invalid, and proving this in court
would be straightforward.
- Compaq (owner of the
: Well, the application date is what counts, and that's mar1992, but I'm
: pretty sure that Bill Jolitz had them beat to that date already...
I'm pretty sure that VMS 3.x used a similar technique. I have my old
VMS internals docs from that time frame (maybe they are from 4.x).
We're
Hi
Go to http://www.uspto.gov/patft/, search for patent number 5873127, and
you will find the description of mapping page table entries into virtual
memory via one page directory entry pointing to the page directory itself
- exactly what FreeBSD does with PTDPTDI and APTDPTDI entries on
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
Hi
Go to http://www.uspto.gov/patft/, search for patent number 5873127, and
you will find the description of mapping page table entries into virtual
memory via one page directory entry pointing to the page directory itself
-
:Hi
:
:Go to http://www.uspto.gov/patft/, search for patent number 5873127, and
:you will find the description of mapping page table entries into virtual
:memory via one page directory entry pointing to the page directory itself
:- exactly what FreeBSD does with PTDPTDI and APTDPTDI entries on
So it looks like we have prior art by around 6 years, which would
invalidate the patent iff it was the same thing.
Does it mean that the algorithm is free to use by everyone or free to use
only in freebsd? I would like to implemet these page table back pointers
too and I'm scared by the
:Hmm, let's see:
:
: Assignee: Digital Equipment Corporation (Maynard, MA)
: Appl. No.: 646734
: Filed: May 3, 1996
:
:Versus:
:
: * Derived from hp300 version by Mike Hibler, this version by William
: * Jolitz uses a recursive map [a pde points to the page directory]
hahahahahahaaThe patent was filed in 1996. In the 90's the patent
office starting granting patents for everything under the sun without
doing real prior art searches. I'm sure even just going to the candy
store these days is patented by someone...
Every time I tease my
So it looks like we have prior art by around 6 years, which would
invalidate the patent iff it was the same thing.
Does it mean that the algorithm is free to use by everyone or free to use
only in freebsd? I would like to implemet these page table back pointers
too and I'm scared by the
: So it looks like we have prior art by around 6 years, which would
: invalidate the patent iff it was the same thing.
:
:Does it mean that the algorithm is free to use by everyone or free to use
:only in freebsd? I would like to implemet these page table back pointers
:too and I'm scared by the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:53:33AM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
So it looks like we have prior art by around 6 years, which would
invalidate the patent iff it was the same thing.
Does it mean that the algorithm is free to use by everyone or free to use
only in freebsd? I would like to
: So it looks like we have prior art by around 6 years, which would
: invalidate the patent iff it was the same thing.
:
:Does it mean that the algorithm is free to use by everyone or free to use
:only in freebsd? I would like to implemet these page table back pointers
:too and I'm scared by the
Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every time I tease my housemate's cat with a laser pointer, I am
violating a US patent. (No, really.)
I need to get a laser pointer...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
:
:Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Every time I tease my housemate's cat with a laser pointer, I am
: violating a US patent. (No, really.)
:
:I need to get a laser pointer...
:
:DES
:--
:Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to get two. Start with both pointing at the
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:27:12PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
You need to get two. Start with both pointing at the same point,
let the cat follow it around a bit, then split them into two different
dots going opposite directions.
If you have two cats get one following
25 matches
Mail list logo