On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:43:12AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
As others already said - to small to run FreeBSD.
No MMU, very tight RAM and code space.
Note that they are not based on Linux, but on uCLinux, which is
something different.
RTEMS should
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:43:12AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
As others already said - to small to run FreeBSD.
No MMU, very tight RAM and code space.
Note that they are not based on Linux, but on uCLinux, which is
something
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:41:42AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:43:12AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
As others already said - to small to run FreeBSD.
No MMU, very tight RAM and code space.
Note that
--- Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
An MMU-less port of any BSD would be very
worthwhile, even if it
requires a radical divergence from the original
codebase. I was
woudn''t it be rather inefficient (in the BEST case)
-handling numerous memory contextx -1 per process?
hoping
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
Note that they are not based on Linux, but on uCLinux, which is
something different.
Not really. It's just a linux kernel compiled without support for
MMUs. Which compiles out most of the linux VM code and adds some
smart stubs
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:13:07AM -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
--- Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
An MMU-less port of any BSD would be very
worthwhile, even if it
requires a radical divergence from the original
codebase. I was
woudn''t it be rather inefficient (in
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:36 +0200:
But considered the small price distance to the smallest Soekris,
which runs FreeBSD, only the size and supply power is an interesting
point.
Or you can look at the TS-7200 from http://www.embeddedarm.com/ . It's
smaller than
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:12:05AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:36 +0200:
But considered the small price distance to the smallest Soekris,
which runs FreeBSD, only the size and supply power is an interesting
point.
Or you can
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 23:06 +0200:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:12:05AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:36 +0200:
But considered the small price distance to the smallest Soekris,
which runs FreeBSD,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:33:48PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 23:06 +0200:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:12:05AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:36 +0200:
But considered the
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 00:54 +0200:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:33:48PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 23:06 +0200:
And the 4526 doesn't need regulated power plus has onboard ata flash.
also looks
Wilko Bulte wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
It's an AMR7, which is pretty minimal. I'm not sure if the existing ARM
code has any considerations for scaling that low. Would be a very
interesting project, though.
Scott
___
Wilko Bulte wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
Netsilicon's NS7520 is ARM7TDMI based processor and no MMU.
That would not be a good choice for running FreeBSD :-)
Kevin
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html
--
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
