Second, the projects page we have now, with all due respect to the
people that try to keep it reasonably organised, is a mess due to the
lack of updates. people only maintain their project pages perhaps, but
certainly not the links that lead to them.
Being able to work with more people on
I guess that most people leading a project could do with a bit of
feature creep, features being shoved under their noses. Even if at first
you think that source control solves all our problems, it still could be
a way to develop new tools and get them running and tried out before
committing them
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Nick Hibma wrote:
I guess that most people leading a project could do with a bit of
feature creep, features being shoved under their noses. Even if at first
you think that source control solves all our problems, it still could be
a way to develop new tools and get
It's my opinion that there's no need for more "polish."
Currently what we have, CVS and the CVSWeb HTTP front-end, seem
perfectly adequate to me.
Well, that depends if sourceforge has more intelligent bug query methods
than simple keyword searches. If you can only keyword search, the
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:04:39AM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote:
It's my opinion that there's no need for more "polish."
Currently what we have, CVS and the CVSWeb HTTP front-end, seem
perfectly adequate to me.
Well, that depends if sourceforge has more intelligent bug query methods
Funny timing don't you think?
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/09/0853201.shtml
In message 14883.957847312@localhost, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
1) Will it scale with 200 developers and (if we put the pr's into the source
forge interface) all the prs?
I think this part should scale
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/project/filelist.php?group_id=1
Contains the software used by source forge to implement the
project/help desk/download tracker thingie which they themselves use
to manage the various projects registered with source forge.
7 matches
Mail list logo
