On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
Hello Hackers
The NetBSD folks have a nice improvement with the rtld-elf subsystem,
known as Negative Symbol Cache .
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
Hello Hackers
The NetBSD folks have a nice improvement with the rtld-elf
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:31 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:31 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:31 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42
I'd call that 1/100th of a second precision, wouldn't you?
You have much better reflexes than I do. :)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
Probably did something like this:
time sh -c '( firefox ); sleep 1000'
and then pressed
FYI, there is an API in Firefox 4 for start up time measurement.
http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2011/01/14/builtin-startup-measurement/
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 23:35 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
Probably did something like this:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 23:35 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:53:49 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 23:35 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:24:18PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
For starters, the number of libraries given binary is linked too is
completely and utterly irrelevant :) The change NetBSD guys claims to
revolutionize his application startup times only applies to programs
that dlopen (read -
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:47:37 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:24:18PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
For starters, the number of libraries given binary is linked too is
completely and utterly irrelevant :) The change NetBSD guys claims
to
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only extra quirk that said commit
does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in
critical performance path.
It's really not my place to say, but it seems strange that if an
optimization
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:25:27 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev
kab...@gmail.com wrote:
The only extra quirk that said commit
does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in
critical performance path.
It's
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:25:27 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev
kab...@gmail.com wrote:
...
numbers proving that it actually helps, instead of mentality
Or even
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:25:27 am Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only extra quirk that said commit
does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in
critical performance path.
It's really
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:40:13 -0500
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:25:27 am Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only extra quirk that said commit
does is an optimization of a
Hello Hackers
The NetBSD folks have a nice improvement with the rtld-elf subsystem,
known as Negative Symbol Cache .
http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_runtime_linker_gains_negative
Roy Marples roy@ has a simple write up of the change.
I took the basic idea from FreeBSD, but improved the
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
Hello Hackers
The NetBSD folks have a nice improvement with the rtld-elf subsystem,
known as Negative Symbol Cache .
http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_runtime_linker_gains_negative
Roy Marples roy@ has a
21 matches
Mail list logo
