On 2008-Aug-23 21:39:34 -0700, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There really isn't any magic to bringing up a port. You compile it,
install it, and then run it until it breaks. Once it breaks you spend
a lot of time instrumenting the code to track down what went wrong.
About what I expected.
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Is there a summary of the open issues somewhere? There are no sun4v
PRs open. http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sun4v effectively hasn't
been touched since November 2006 and suggests that the only critical
issue is lack of serial port support.
There is
I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
OpenBSD/sparc64 runs UltraSPARC-T1 and UltraSPARC-T2 systems... and the
com port works too. ;)
In addition to UltraSPARC III, III+, IIIi, IV and
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
: Hash: SHA512
:
: Kris Kennaway wrote:
: | Just so everyone is on the same page, what is needed to keep sun4v
: | viable are people with experience with (or intention to learn
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Is there a summary of the open issues somewhere? There are no sun4v
PRs open. http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sun4v effectively hasn't
been touched since November 2006 and suggests that the only critical
issue is lack of serial port support.
There is a better
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Is there a summary of the open issues somewhere? There are no sun4v
PRs open. http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sun4v effectively hasn't
been touched since November 2006 and suggests that the only
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 06:52:07PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
There is a better interpretation, which is that the only critical issue
is lack of real users for this port, not lack of serial port support :).
My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished
work in the
On 2008-Aug-23 22:40:55 -0500, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished
work in the kernel, so expecting there to be any userbase is premature.
Except that the wiki gives a far more optimistic picture.
All of our 'new'
Hi Peter,
There really isn't any magic to bringing up a port. You compile it,
install it, and then run it until it breaks. Once it breaks you spend
a lot of time instrumenting the code to track down what went wrong.
Then, depending on the amount of technical insight you have in to the
issue, you
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Sevan / Venture37
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
OpenBSD/sparc64 supports the sun4v architecture has done for a while.
Nikolay Kalev wrote:
I would also like to help as well.
As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of
servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of
hardware as well.
I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.
Just so everyone is on the same
I would also like to help as well.
As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of
servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of
hardware as well.
I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| Just so everyone is on the same page, what is needed to keep sun4v
| viable are people with experience with (or intention to learn about) low
| level architectural and implementation details of the FreeBSD kernel and
| the
On 2008-Aug-22 17:04:00 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just so everyone is on the same page, what is needed to keep sun4v
viable are people with experience with (or intention to learn about) low
level architectural and implementation details of the FreeBSD kernel
What
14 matches
Mail list logo
