On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:34:24PM +0200, Davide Italiano wrote:
What would perhaps be better than a hardcoded reclaim age would be to use
an LRU-type approach and perhaps set a target percent to reclaim. That is,
suppose you were to reclaim the oldest 10% of hashes on each lowmem call
Hello,
Please let me know if anyone is up to fix fuse on FreeBSD 9.x ?
Particularly this bug: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
I'm willing to pay for the fix.
Thank you,
Luke
Hi,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/
GENERIC. See how it behaves.
I've successfully done buildworlds on 10-i386 with 128mb RAM. Let's try not
to break that before releng/10 is cut.
thanks,
-adrian
On 7 October 2013 23:34, Peter Holm pe...@holm.cc
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/
GENERIC. See how it behaves.
I've successfully done buildworlds on 10-i386 with 128mb RAM. Let's try not
to break that before
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 5:21, Łukasz P wrote:
Hello,
Please let me know if anyone is up to fix fuse on FreeBSD 9.x ?
Particularly this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739
I'm willing to pay for the fix.
I
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/
GENERIC. See how it behaves.
I've successfully done
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:34, Mark Felder wrote:
I think the fix is the new from-scratch fuse module in FreeBSD 10,
which in my experience works flawlessly. Perhaps you should instead see
if someone is willing to backport that fuse module to 9.x?
Well actually the description on the
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200
Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org wrote:
Thank you - I'll give it a try today.
Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable?
I'm sorry but I've never even tried rsync on top of a fuse mount.
Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Yamagi Burmeister [mailto:li...@yamagi.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:14 PM
To: ad...@3dr.org
Cc: f...@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200
Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org
06.10.2013 08:54, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
29.09.2013 00:30, Teske, Devin wrote:
Interested in feedback, but moreover I would like to see who is
interested in tackling this with me? I can't do it alone... I at least
need testers whom will
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 7:08, Łukasz P wrote:
Thank you - I'll give it a try today.
Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable?
Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system have you used?
My main use case these days is ntfs-3g, and I no longer get panics when
There's already a backport which can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~flo/fusefs-kmod.tar.bz2
1. Download, untar and replace your existing sysutils/fusefs-kmod
port with it. Open the Makefile and add NO_STAGE= yes to it.
2. cd sysutils/fusefs-kmod ; make makesum ; make deinstall
Responding to myself...
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:13:35 +0200
Yamagi Burmeister li...@yamagi.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200
Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org wrote:
Thank you - I'll give it a try today.
Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable?
I'm sorry but
Sounds good - I'm using MooseFS file system - and problems with fuse occurs
during rsync.
I will test suggested by you http://people.freebsd.org/~flo/fusefs-kmod.tar.bz2
- and will let know if that works in few hours.
-Original Message-
From: Yamagi Burmeister
Thank you - I'll give it a try today.
Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable?
Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system have you used?
Luke
-Original Message-
From: Yamagi Burmeister [mailto:li...@yamagi.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:03
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:58 +0200
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say,
128mb w/ GENERIC. See how it behaves.
Be aware that any test that doesn't
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:58 +0200
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say,
128mb
17 matches
Mail list logo