Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:34:24PM +0200, Davide Italiano wrote: What would perhaps be better than a hardcoded reclaim age would be to use an LRU-type approach and perhaps set a target percent to reclaim. That is, suppose you were to reclaim the oldest 10% of hashes on each lowmem call

Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Łukasz P
Hello, Please let me know if anyone is up to fix fuse on FreeBSD 9.x ? Particularly this bug: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739 I'm willing to pay for the fix. Thank you, Luke

Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/ GENERIC. See how it behaves. I've successfully done buildworlds on 10-i386 with 128mb RAM. Let's try not to break that before releng/10 is cut. thanks, -adrian On 7 October 2013 23:34, Peter Holm pe...@holm.cc

Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread Davide Italiano
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Hi Adrian, Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/ GENERIC. See how it behaves. I've successfully done buildworlds on 10-i386 with 128mb RAM. Let's try not to break that before

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 5:21, Łukasz P wrote: Hello, Please let me know if anyone is up to fix fuse on FreeBSD 9.x ? Particularly this bug: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182739 I'm willing to pay for the fix. I

Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread Davide Italiano
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Hi Adrian, Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/ GENERIC. See how it behaves. I've successfully done

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:34, Mark Felder wrote: I think the fix is the new from-scratch fuse module in FreeBSD 10, which in my experience works flawlessly. Perhaps you should instead see if someone is willing to backport that fuse module to 9.x? Well actually the description on the

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200 Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org wrote: Thank you - I'll give it a try today. Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable? I'm sorry but I've never even tried rsync on top of a fuse mount. Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system

RE: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Łukasz P
Thank you! -Original Message- From: Yamagi Burmeister [mailto:li...@yamagi.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:14 PM To: ad...@3dr.org Cc: f...@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2 On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200 Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org

Re: ZFS Boot Menu

2013-10-08 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
06.10.2013 08:54, Teske, Devin wrote: On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 29.09.2013 00:30, Teske, Devin wrote: Interested in feedback, but moreover I would like to see who is interested in tackling this with me? I can't do it alone... I at least need testers whom will

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 7:08, Łukasz P wrote: Thank you - I'll give it a try today. Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable? Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system have you used? My main use case these days is ntfs-3g, and I no longer get panics when

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
There's already a backport which can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~flo/fusefs-kmod.tar.bz2 1. Download, untar and replace your existing sysutils/fusefs-kmod port with it. Open the Makefile and add NO_STAGE= yes to it. 2. cd sysutils/fusefs-kmod ; make makesum ; make deinstall

Re: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
Responding to myself... On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:13:35 +0200 Yamagi Burmeister li...@yamagi.org wrote: On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:08:41 +0200 Łukasz P ad...@3dr.org wrote: Thank you - I'll give it a try today. Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable? I'm sorry but

RE: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Łukasz P
Sounds good - I'm using MooseFS file system - and problems with fuse occurs during rsync. I will test suggested by you http://people.freebsd.org/~flo/fusefs-kmod.tar.bz2 - and will let know if that works in few hours. -Original Message- From: Yamagi Burmeister

RE: Fuse on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-08 Thread Łukasz P
Thank you - I'll give it a try today. Can you confirm that doing rsync with this fuse version is stable? Can you please tell us which fuse-based file system have you used? Luke -Original Message- From: Yamagi Burmeister [mailto:li...@yamagi.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:03

Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread RW
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:58 +0200 Davide Italiano wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Hi Adrian, Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/ GENERIC. See how it behaves. Be aware that any test that doesn't

Re: Call fo comments - raising vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage?

2013-10-08 Thread Davide Italiano
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:58 +0200 Davide Italiano wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Hi Adrian, Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb