Re: kern/121743: [netinet] [patch] ipfw in-kernel nat loses fragmented packets

2008-03-18 Thread piso
Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] ipfw in-kernel nat loses fragmented packets Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw->piso Responsible-Changed-By: piso Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 18 14:49:49 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: Assign it to me. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121743

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Julian Elischer wrote: About Vadim's prepositions: 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. 32 but ints I

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:21:11AM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename it to "bytelimit" or somewhat. Second, allow this to use

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:21:11AM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename it to "bytelimit" or somewhat. Second, allow this to use tablearg and possibly abi