Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:43:31 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename it

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we should extend our

Dummynet causes kernel trap and system freeze

2008-03-19 Thread Vladimir V. Kobal
Here is the backtraces for two sequential crashes for kernel compiled with options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Julian Elischer
Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Julian Elischer! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:09:19 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': About Vadim's prepositions: 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits