Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION':
>>> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in >>> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we >>> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. >> >> tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. >> 32 but ints >> IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints) >> IPV6 addresses. >> skipto locations > Yes, i agree. As I remember, we already talked about this > some time ago. Can you please recall what else you've discussed? :) -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
