How about filing a bug report for it? You've
> already got a good write-up of the situation.
>
Both this and SYSV IPC jail support[1] are badly needed.
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--
Mark Felder
ports-secteam member
f...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gt; management?
>
>
I don't use ezjail. It doesn't upgrade well, and changes to the base
jail require you stop all your jails. FreeBSD fat jails are so small
(300MB?) it's not worth it in my opinion. I simply wrote a shell script
to create fat jails and another script to handle upda
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 08:17, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 07:41, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Vimage has to be compiled into the kernel and its kernel compile option
has comment that it is highly experimental.
No it doesn't.
# Network stack virtualization.
#options
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 10:12, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Ernie Luzar luzar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
In my opinion any port that does not include complete documentation in
its man pages is next to useless and many people agree. Ezjail man
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 11:03, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 27.01.15 17:57, Mark Felder wrote:
I'll admit that last time I used ezjail I found it frustratingly
difficult to locate concise documentation on exactly how flavours
worked, and how to use scripts to do things to the new jails
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 11:17, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 27.01.15 14:41, Ernie Luzar wrote:
I hope the ezjail author takes this thread as incentive to keep his
utility up to date and not let it die due to changing software in Freebsd
base code. All I am doing is pointing out the facts
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 09:16, Ian Smith wrote:
Excuse top-post, but the gmail header on this message was (surprisingly)
insufficiently anonymised to disguise its origin:
That could very well be Joe Barbish. It could also be someone in the
same city who uses FreeBSD and likes qjails.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, at 00:18, Alexander Lunev wrote:
As i said in message to Jamie Gritton, i found why jails couldn't ping
internet - i forget to add jail's address to table which permitted to
NAT.
Why subnet mask should be /32? What harm could be done if subnet mask of
an
alias is
On 2014-05-13 07:11, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
I think you have made some poor basic design choices.
Let him scratch his itch. Maybe it solves a problem you haven't
encountered yet?
1. Requiring python as a dependent. Thats a lot of overhead just for a
script. Not a show stopper, but
I would also recommend ezjails. Using fat jails is often completely
unnecessary.
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, at 11:25, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi
I would like to known if someone here have in production a FreeBSD server
with postgresql and the FS for the data of postgresql is a ZFS pool.
I'm going to buy some server with 96Go of Ram and a jbod of 12 disks (4To
each)
The
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013, at 12:03, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
Hi there. I updated to 10-STABLE after it was branched and suddenly none
of my [ez]jails will start. Does it have anything to do with the entry in
UPDATING?
What's the best way to solve it?
This is being discussed. I don't know a
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013, at 14:30, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 11.10.13 21:27, wishmaster wrote:
Yeah!? But do you think updating python in each jail this is the
right solution? Freebsd-update in each jail?? What about when number
of jails is 10 or about. My server is very high loaded and I
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 23:22, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
i have a box with FreeBSD-9.1-Release-amd64.
I did freebsd-update to the host and to the jails in, one of them is
32bit
and since then i get:
root@6:/root # jexec 1 /bin/csh
/lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout
root@6:/root #
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 6:48, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
is there a simple way to interpret the data in /var/db/freebsd-update
that
sits inside a jail, from HOST and install the updates that already
fetched
somehow ?
freebsd-update uses binary patches. They are not entire files you could
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 7:03, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
thanks for replying me so fast.
what i ment is:
1. in the jail (32 bit) to do:
freebsd-update fetch
# ls /var/db/freebsd-update/
./
../
f465c3739385890c221dff1a05e578c6cae0d0430e46996d319db7439f884336-install@
filelist
files/
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 2:29, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
On 08-10-2013 15:16, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:10, Miguel C. wrote:
Yeah I'm doing the same and works fine but the panic should be
investigated I guess.
If there's not a PR open for this scenario please
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013, at 22:29, Miguel Clara wrote:
I'm also not sure whats the best way to make zfs datasets visible inside
a
jail... should simply use mount_nullfs?
I just use nullfs for my plex jail. Keeping it simple seems to work just
fine.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:10, Miguel C. wrote:
Yeah I'm doing the same and works fine but the panic should be
investigated I guess.
If there's not a PR open for this scenario please submit what you've
found.
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 20:55, Josh Beard wrote:
Starting a jail with a LAN and public address changes the host's routing
table and will not talk over the public network. Cycling the netif and
routing services resolves it.
I'm not aware of the routing issue you're describing. I had a
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 7:12, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
I need all jails to use the 127.0.0.1 address, not different hosts in
127.0.0 network.
Jails cannot all share the same loopback. The networking in a jail is a
bit odd if you're new to it. If you really want each jail to act like
its own
On Thu, 02 May 2013 08:49:43 -0500, Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
I tested doing a kldload ipfw and fall into the default deny problem.
Is there a sysctl to flip the default deny to default accept?
options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT when you build the kernel is the only
way AFAIK
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:22:01 -0600, Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org
wrote:
You're allowed to have the same address in multiple jails, but only in
the case of jails that have one address (i.e. one IPv4 address in this
case).
Whoa, really? Why did I not know of those? I always thought each
On Tue, 15 May 2012 09:23:38 -0500, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't quite understand what you mean about that. Does it mean that you
have fixed it or that you will fix it sometime in the future?
It's not scheduled to be pushed into 9-STABLE (MFC'd) for quite
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:03:22 -0500, Anders Hagman
anders.hag...@netplex.se wrote:
I have used vnet jail to get your own IP stack.
One strange thing is that tcpdump on the host can not see the packets.
Yes, vnet avoids this issue. You shouldn't be able to tcpdump on the host
to see the
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:16:47 -0500, Juan F. Díaz y Díaz
j...@mrecic.gov.ar wrote:
Mark, you can just run a jail with the setfib utility so you don't need
to modify all your scripts.
I don't think anyone here is understanding the issue and forcing a routing
table will not help.
26 matches
Mail list logo
