> Subject: Re: sysutils/iocage in a NAS environment
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> From: allanj...@freebsd.org
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:22:39 -0400
>
> On 2015-07-31 06:24, Kai Gallasch wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Just read that FreeNAS 10 is going to use sy
Hi Marko. I'm running an almost identical setup, but I do not have this issue:
ICMP echo reply packets are sent from the right interface.
The only difference is that I didn't defined additional lo1 and lo2 interfaces,
but I guess it shouldn't be the cause.
I'm running releng/10.3. Which release
From: Marko Cupać
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Hotlab
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: setfib (ez)jails and wierd routing
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:38:58 +
> Andrew Hotlab wrote:
>
> > I'm runnin
From: Marko Cupać
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:58 PM
To: Andrew Hotlab
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: setfib (ez)jails and wierd routing
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:17:16 +
> Andrew Hotlab wrote:
>
> > root@BSD11:~ # cat
Sorry for the stupid question, but I just realised that I'm unable
to know the real value of a specific parameter. For example,
I know that the allow.raw_sockets is set to "1" for the jail "jtest01",
because I set so in the /etc/jail.conf file, but when I type the sysctl
command inside the jail, it
> How can I get real jail.param values for a specific running jail?
Replying to my own question... I just fount that it's possible to
know it from the host with the command jls(8). Here is an example:
root@host01:~ # jls -nj jtest01 allow.raw_sockets
allow.raw_sockets=1
Someone can tell me if it
Hi to all.
That's my first post to this list, and I want to tanks all the guys who spend
their time helping the FreeBSD Community to obtain the most from this wonderful
OS, and I'll be glad to grow my experience as fast as possible to be able to
donate my modest contribute too.
Coming from a
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Leidinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:35 AM
> To: Andrew Hotlab
> Cc: FreeBSD-Jail
> Subject: Re: How to better update a jail host system
>
> > To track the security branch both on
--
From: "Alexander Leidinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:46 PM
To: ; "Andrew Hotlab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to better update a jail host system
> Regarding the distri
--
From: "Jon Passki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 5:48 AM
To: "Andrew Hotlab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD-Jail"
Subject: Re: How to better update a jail host system
You c
--
From: "Alexander Leidinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:41 AM
To: "Andrew Hotlab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD-Jail"
Subject: Re: How to better update a jail host system
> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:45:42 +> From: bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net>
> >> Can you explain more details about "32bit compat on 64bit, jail v1 compat,
> >> .."?>> Is it possible to run 32bit jail in 64bit host and build & run
> 32bit ports >> (marked as i386 only) in it? What is needet t
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:28:39 +0200
> From: reddvinyl...@gmail.com
> To: jose.ameng...@gmail.com; freebsd-jail@freebsd.org;
> freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org
> CC:
> Subject: Re: Best practice to update jails
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Jose Amengual wrote:
>
>> any reason of why
It seems that FreeBSD 8 does not like to start rc scripts named *.sh. Here is a
little
patch for the script ezjail-admin which seems to fix the problem.
--- ezjail-admin2009/12/20 23:28:09 1.1+++ ezjail-admin
2009/12/20 23:28:26
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@
# If a config is found,
-
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:41:19 +0100
> From: cryx-free...@h3q.com
> To: andrew.hot...@hotmail.com
> CC: b...@ipt.ru; freebsd-questi...@k-moeller.dk; freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ezjail.flavour
>
> Andrew Hotlab wrote:
>> I th
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:12:20 +0100
> From: 000.f...@quip.cz
> To: sp...@bway.net
> CC: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: 32-bit jails on a 64-bit system?
>
>> The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include:
>>
> From: li...@jnielsen.net
> To: freebsd-emulat...@freebsd.org
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:25:27 -0500
> CC: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: linux-only jail possible?
>
> Has anyone tried to run a jail containing only Linux binaries? I need a
> lightweig
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:53:43 -0500
> From: st...@ibctech.ca
> To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> CC: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Jails & 8.0
>
> Sorry for the cross-post, but this is a 'thank-you', not a request for help.
>
> I want to express my
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 23:46:31 +0300
> From: samank...@netscape.net
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Creating jails to run Squid and multiple Bind services - Newbee
>
> Hi,
>
> am attempting to create a set of Jails for the first time!!
>
Welco
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 02:23:05 +0300
> From: samank...@netscape.net
> To: andrew.hot...@hotmail.com
> CC: 000.f...@quip.cz; freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Creating jails to run Squid and multiple Bind services - Newbee
>
> Many thanks Miroslav a
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:02:03 +
> To: lini...@freebsd.org; freebsd-am...@freebsd.org; freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
> From: lini...@freebsd.org
> CC:
> Subject: Re: kern/147162: [jail] [panic] Page Fault / Kernel panic when jail
> starts on boot
>
> Old
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:15:21 +0300
> From: samank...@netscape.net
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Strange things happening with jails?? Not starting up on boot or
> services not running inside!
>
> I have managed to create 4 and migrate many
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:28:15 +1200
> From: free...@snap.net.nz
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Jail hot migration
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I was lately thinking around jail hot-migration feature where one jail
> could be moved from one host to another without
> shutting it down, something l
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:45:20 +
> From: k...@7he.at
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Jail hot migration
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:28:15PM +1200, Peter Toth wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was lately thinking around jail hot-migration feature where one jail
> > could be mo
> From: danieljfaulk...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:00:52 +1300
> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Multiple Subnets/interfaces
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a FreeBSD server with two interfaces, both on different physical
> networks. I want to have some jails on each network.
>
> # This fil
I noticed a strange behavior some days ago, but I can't say how much long it
have been happening for. Some processes which are running in different jails
on the same host seems to be listening on all host IPs. Here is an example:
#sockstat -4l | grep "4 \*:"
root mDNSRespon 69801 3 udp4
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Vassiliadis
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:54 AM
To: Andrew Hotlab
Cc: FreeBSD-Jail
Subject: Re: jailed process listening on host addresses
On 1/4/2012 3:10 AM, Andrew Hotlab wrote:
> I noticed a strange behavior some days ago, but I can't
-Original Message-
From: Eirik Øverby
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:35 AM
To: Andrew Hotlab
Cc: FreeBSD-Jail
Subject: Re: jailed process listening on host addresses
On 4. jan. 2012, at 02:10, "Andrew Hotlab"
wrote:
> I noticed a strange behavior some days ago, bu
28 matches
Mail list logo
