Re: fib 1 DHCP and RA default route

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:11 AM Stefan Bethke wrote: > I'm setting up a new router that has both an ADSL/PPPoE and a cable modem > upstream. I've configured mpd5 for the PPPoE connection, and I'd like to > have the cable modem provide a second, independent connection through FIB 1 > over igb2.

Using ALTQ with bce and not igb on same box

Hi all, I'm setting up a system with 4 NIC's, 2 igb and 2 bce. I plan to deploy it like: Switch-VoIP - igb0 bce0 :: HFSC - 65mb/s-Radio Switch-LAN - igb1 bce1 :: HFSC - 1000mb/s-Radio Where the traffic flow is typically igb0 <--> bce0, igb1 <--> bce1. With reference to the patch on

Re: QOS/TOS in carp/freebsd in general

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:27 AM, Tom Jones wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:30:45PM -0400, Nick Wolff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I currently have a review in to make carp use dscp values on outgoing > > packets. This will make it easier to preform QOS on modern switches as

Re: How to remove a screwed up route?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Scott Ellentuch wrote: > Hi, > > I did a very foolish thing > > route add -net 61.177.172.137 gw 127.0.0.1 > > > 1) Thats not a net, thats a host > 2) Thats my Linux's syntax, not what I expected > > So now I have the following in my

Re: Dell SAS controller / mpr?

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Ben RUBSON <ben.rub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 07 Oct 2017, at 21:11, Lee Brown <l...@ratnaling.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ben RUBSON <ben.rub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> On 06

Re: Dell SAS controller / mpr?

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ben RUBSON <ben.rub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 06 Oct 2017, at 22:09, Lee Brown <l...@ratnaling.org> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I want to purchase a dell R330 system with a "SAS 12Gbps HBA External > >

Dell SAS controller / mpr?

Hi All, I want to purchase a dell R330 system with a "SAS 12Gbps HBA External Controller", which I believe is this (pdf) card, based on the LSI SAS 3008 controller, which seems to be

Re: Problem with igb NIC on fresh 11 Install

for the feedback Matt. On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Matt Joras <mjo...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 09/30/2017 11:36, Lee Brown wrote: > > It looks like the driver is not passing packets from the VLAN layer to > the > > NIC. Switch counters verify this and netstat se

Re: Problem with igb NIC on fresh 11 Install

enabled bar [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base Oxd000, size 32, enabled bar [1c] = type Memory, range 32, base Oxdf38, size 16384, enabled cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports DO D3 current DO cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 61 bit, vector masks On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lee Brown &

Problem with igb NIC on fresh 11 Install

Hi, I've been using FreeBSD for years, so I'm familiar with the setup. I just got a server, supermicro motherboard, 4 intel NICs, installed the FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1. uname reports FreeBSD11.1-RELEASE #0 321309. Unfortunately the igb NIC's don't appear to work correctly. With no

General question about 1GB vs 10GB NIC's

I want to build a router that has 2 x 500mb/s radio ISP facing, 2 x 500mb/s radio's facing another site, plus a 1gb/s link to the LAN. I plan to plug everything into a switch so I can have redundant routers. So my question is should I go with 5 x 1GB NIC's or 2x10GB NIC's on the motherboard.

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

ld be > the source of problems, and just saying if this was a non-Intel design it > could be an issue, but > since you are being brave don't let me ruin your adventure :) > > Jack > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Lee Brown <l...@ratnaling.org> wrote: > >&

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Its not that they, whoever they is :). "use" the Intel PCID, no, it really > IS the Intel device, > but it's silicon, not an assembled adapter, its that part which is being > done by someone > else, and btw, the components

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, "should be", but just remember now, if this adapter does not look > like a > genuine Intel made part (and from some comment from either Jeff or Eric it > sounded like it wasn't), then IF you have a problem you are going

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sean Bruno <sbr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 09/20/16 03:42, Lee Brown wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Sean Bruno <sbr...@freebsd.org > > <mailto:sbr...@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > > &

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

I agree, but unfortunately nothing Intel offers came remotely close. They have only 1 card that does singlemode, which is a single port to boot and I can't stick 4 of those in my server. My choice was merely the only thing I could find :( I think I'm going to be better off getting some managed

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Sean Bruno <sbr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 09/19/16 14:17, Lee Brown wrote: > > I am looking to purchase this <http://www.ebay.com/itm/131922616647> > card > > (LR-LINK I350AM4 Chip Quad SFP Port 1000Base-X Server Adapt

Will this card (probably) work?

I am looking to purchase this card (LR-LINK I350AM4 Chip Quad SFP Port 1000Base-X Server Adapter I350-F4), into which I intend to use 1000-LX SFP's. If I'm understanding correctly, the igb(4) driver supports the i350 (not sure if i350AM4 is the same) and

Re: Cannot access a couple websites

Probably not at all related, but I had a similar problem, youtube worked fine, but cnn would get partial page loads, through a box NATing a public IP. The culprit for me was MTU was wrong. I had FreeBSD in a Xen VM, using the FreeBSD xn driver utilizing VLAN's. When I used VLAN's on that driver