Abelenda Diego wrote this message on Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 18:21 +0200:
> Thank you for your input.
>
> Due to how convoluted the change in the configuration of FreeBSD would have
> been I had to completely change my infrastructure to match the vision my
> datacenter unilaterally imposed on me...
Hello,
Thank you for your input.
Due to how convoluted the change in the configuration of FreeBSD would have
been I had to completely change my infrastructure to match the vision my
datacenter unilaterally imposed on me... So now I don't have this need anymore.
Best regards,
Diego Abelenda
On
Abelenda Diego wrote this message on Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 18:54 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for pointing route "-iface" however I can't seem to manage what I
> want.
>
> When I use:
> "route add -host $IP_NOT_IN_SUBNET -iface bce0"
>
> I get "netstat -rn" to say someting like:
>
> Internet:
10.09.2020 23:54, Abelenda Diego wrote:
> Thank you for pointing route "-iface" however I can't seem to manage what I
> want.
>
> When I use:
> "route add -host $IP_NOT_IN_SUBNET -iface bce0"
>
> I get "netstat -rn" to say someting like:
>
> Internet:
> DestinationGateway
Hello,
Thank you for pointing route "-iface" however I can't seem to manage what I
want.
When I use:
"route add -host $IP_NOT_IN_SUBNET -iface bce0"
I get "netstat -rn" to say someting like:
Internet:
DestinationGateway Flags Netif Expire
default
09.09.2020 21:42, Abelenda Diego wrote:
> I've got a FreeBSD installation in a DataCenter that provided me with a single
> address IPv4 with an upstream gateway (cidr is fine the upstream gateway works
> everything is nice and running). I use this machine for Masquerading an
> private
>
Le Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:42:54 +0200,
Abelenda Diego a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've got a FreeBSD installation in a DataCenter that provided me with a single
> address IPv4 with an upstream gateway (cidr is fine the upstream gateway works
> everything is nice and running). I use this machine for
Hello Cristian,
Thank you for your pointer, however if I quote part of my question:
> From my understanding in FreeBSD the route command is unable to perform this
> kind of configuration where you tell that the IPv4 /32 is available without
> next-hop (no via) on a specific link.
I imply there
Hi
The equivalent command in FreeBSD for the ip route is the route,
follow manpage https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?route
Em qua., 9 de set. de 2020 às 11:43, Abelenda Diego
escreveu:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a FreeBSD installation in a DataCenter that provided me with a single
> address IPv4
Hello,
I've got a FreeBSD installation in a DataCenter that provided me with a single
address IPv4 with an upstream gateway (cidr is fine the upstream gateway works
everything is nice and running). I use this machine for Masquerading an private
infrastructure.
Now I need other machines with
10 matches
Mail list logo