On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 02:35:13PM -0700, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On 4 Feb 2014, at 1:38, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
below are two patches that implement RFC6937 (Proportional Rate Reduction
for TCP) and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 (Updating TCP to support
Rate-Limited Traffic). They
TCP_SIGNATURE
Index: sys/netinet/tcp_newcwv.c
===
--- sys/netinet/tcp_newcwv.c(revision 0)
+++ sys/netinet/tcp_newcwv.c(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org
+ * All rights reserved
the state
out into a struct?
On 30 June 2014 10:04, Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, Updating
TCP
to support Rate-Limited Traffic. The patch is a port of the Linux
implementation by Raffaello Secchi with influence from
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:53:59PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
lost and it can be assigned for some review?
http://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
Done
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
I have updated the patch to move the new variable introduced with newcwv into
a
struct within the tcpcb.
Forgot some files in the diff.
--
Tom | I don't see how we are going to build the dystopian megapoli
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:43:49PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch based on
a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch should
still be useful?
My newcwv patch is much more up to date than Aris's
, Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:43:49PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch
based on
a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch
should
still be useful?
My newcwv
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:54:16PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
I am an application developer and I’m interested in using TCP Fast Open,
which now has an Experimental RFC (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7413/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7413/). IPv4 TFO has been available
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 09:59:01AM +0300, Karlis Laivins wrote:
Hello,
I have read an interesting publication about a proposed modification of TCP
Congestion Control algorithm that would allow to improve it (the CC) by
dynamic bandwidth estimation. The idea seems so interesting that I would
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:14:49PM +0530, Harsh Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have observed memory leak with TCP network traffic in "newreno".
>
> Output of vmstat -m
>
> in_mfilter 3 3K - 3 1024
> in_multi 4 1K - 4 256
> ip_moptions 6
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:54:48AM +0200, Dries Michiels wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> I’m using the igb (intel I210) driver for my LAN interface and the em
> (intel I219-V) driver for the WAN interface. I use this FreeBSD box
> as my home server so I wouldn’t say that it has a heavy ipv6 workload.
>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 08:30:28PM +0200, Dries Michiels wrote:
> Dear mailing list,
>
> After upgrading my FreeBSD server from source from:
> FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE (VADOS) #9 r331859: Sun Apr 1 12:09:18 CEST 2018
> to
> FreeBSD 11.2-PRERELEASE (VADOS) #10 r333091: Sun Apr 29 16:48:44 CEST 2018
>
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:30:45PM -0400, Nick Wolff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have a review in to make carp use dscp values on outgoing
> packets. This will make it easier to preform QOS on modern switches as we
> have been able to drive carp insane on 10g links while throwing storage
>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:29:50PM -0700, vm finance wrote:
> Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket
> basis.
> Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work
> seamlessly?
I have not heard of any problems and have happily done recently:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some thoughts about this topic.
>
> Delaying ACKs means loss of performance when using Gigabit TCP
> connections in data centers. There it is important to ACK the data as
> quick as possible, to avoid running out of
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:55:21PM +0200, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some thoughts about this topic.
>
Hi freebsd-net,
I have been working for the last few months of porting VPP to FreeBSD and this
work is now ready for very early testing. This porting work is sponsored by the
FreeBSD Foundation in partnership with RG Nets.
If you would like to experiment with VPP on FreeBSD then you can work
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, at 20:20, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on
> FreeBSD? Any link to follow?
>
> Benoît
I’m working to upstream changes right now and plan to start a development
branch early next week.
- Tom
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:31, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> How does work VNET with interfaces? Is this as efficient as using pci
> passtrough in a vm ?
Overhead should be minimal, while the device is logically missing from the
default vnet there isn't any more "in the way" for actual usage.
19 matches
Mail list logo
