Hallo Dan Casey,
I am setting up a single server as a 'build box' for our freebsd
servers. We want to build our own packages because
1. we may need to compile certain ports with different flags then
freebsd chooses.
You can cutomize the build with /etc/make.conf,
or createing a
Hallo Chris Byrnes,
However, people connecting get 454 4.3.3 tls not available after start
and in /var/log/maillog i see [ip] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN
during connection to IPv4
You need TLS (openssl) Support, and maybe SMTPS Support as well.
kind regards Dirk
- Dirk Meyer, Im
So I typically use portupgrade to install and upgrade my ports. I recently
realized that there's an additional apache22 module that isn't installed by
default that I would like. It's the mod_auth_dbd and mod_dbd modules if you
care. But the point is that I'm trying to figure out the easiest way
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: timmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I typically use portupgrade to install and upgrade my ports. I recently
realized that there's an additional apache22 module that isn't installed
by default that I would like. It's the mod_auth_dbd and mod_dbd modules
if you care. But the point is that I'm
Quoting Jung-uk Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:14:57 -0400):
If someone's motivated enough, we can borrow some code from
DragonFlyBSD:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2004-June/002271.html
Something like the following?
On Thursday 12 April 2007 11:44:03 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:56 AM, David Southwell wrote:
I am trying to setup mailman and am using apache22 with a number of
virtual
servers. All the virtual server roots are located on a seperate
physical
drives with the path to
At least for me, mysqlhotcopy from mysql-scripts-4.1.22
will not work with p5-DBD-mysql41-4.003
Also tried a rebuild of p5-DBI, p5-DBD-mysql41 and mysql-scripts.
Reverted to p5-DBD-mysql41-4.001 and it works again.
FWIW
Regards,
Lars
___
[EMAIL
On 4/13/07, Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I think it's because lang/gcc41, gcc42's usage of USE_GNOME is incorrect.
It should be
WANT_GNOME= yes
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
USE_GNOME+=
And our INDEX builder is i386, so we don't see this.
On Friday 13 April 2007 02:57:49 you wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2007 11:44:03 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:56 AM, David Southwell wrote:
I am trying to setup mailman and am using apache22 with a number of
virtual
servers. All the virtual server roots are located on a
Thanks guys, following your instructions I managed to get it working
by installing:
- Opera 9.20 for FreeBSD (from www.opera.com);
- opera-linuxplugins (from the ports);
- linux-flashplugin7 (from the ports).
No tweaks were needed here.
I'm noticing a glitch on Flash-Videos (e.g. YouTube) where
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:59:09 +0200
Vladimir Horak [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
I discover problem with ruby18-xmpp4r-0.3 and new ruby-1.8.6,1.
The problem apply to Digest::MD5 (see
http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_6/NEWS).
This solve it:
sasl.rb:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:17 AM, David Southwell wrote:
Thanks very much - very helpful.
May I trouble you with two additional questions..
1. File ownership in the /usr/local/mailman hierarchy.. should
that remain
in group and owner mailman? All files in my /usr2/virtualwebs/
hierarch are
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:53:18 +0200
Stephan Maka [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
I don't mind.
Besides, I just decided to release 0.3.1 in the next few days, fixing
not only this issue.
I have only one FreeBSD machine left, is there anyone who wants to take
maintainership for this port?
I
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Benjamin Lutz p??e v ?t 10. 04. 2007 v 04:52 +0200:
[snip]
3) Save this to /usr/local/etc/parallel_builds.conf:
http://www.maxlor.com/temp/parallel_builds.conf .
This is a list of ports as stored in PKGORIGIN, or as
Peter Pentchev píše v pá 13. 04. 2007 v 18:06 +0300:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Benjamin Lutz p??e v ?t 10. 04. 2007 v 04:52 +0200:
[snip]
3) Save this to /usr/local/etc/parallel_builds.conf:
http://www.maxlor.com/temp/parallel_builds.conf .
In mm_cfg.py
what is the correct syntax to follow when there are multiple
POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS to be identified extending for more than a
single line??
e.g
POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = [
virt1.ain
virt2.ain
etc
]
vaild or what?
are seperating commas required?
Is there an open/close
On Friday 13 April 2007 06:37:36 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:17 AM, David Southwell wrote:
Thanks very much - very helpful.
May I trouble you with two additional questions..
1. File ownership in the /usr/local/mailman hierarchy.. should
that remain
in group and
On Apr 13, 2007, at 9:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = [
virt1.ain
virt2.ain
etc
]
vaild or what?
are seperating commas required?
Is there an open/close bracket needed or '\' for end of line?
Separating commas are required, yes, and Python uses the [ ] to
Rong-en Fan píše v pá 13. 04. 2007 v 19:39 +0800:
I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
WANT_GNOME=yes
and use += for USE_GNOME after bsd.port.pre.mk
The usual workaround is
USE_GNOME= # empty
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
USE_GNOME+= foo bar baz
--
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL
I have configured the latest pam_ldap/nss_ldap on FreeBSD 6-STABLE.
I have /usr/local/etc/nss_ldap.conf and /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf
hard linked. Everything works fine with:
uri ldap://ldap.il.thewrittenword.com
base ou=users,dc=thewrittenword,dc=com
ldap_version 3
rootbinddn
On 2007-Apr-13 17:43:54 +0200, David Ne?as (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
implements it. How many ports exist that can fail with N+1
jobs yet cannot break with N jobs (for N 1)?
As far as I can see, for a port to be safely built with N1 jobs then
it needs to have proper dependency
As you may know, we're not far from merging xorg modular in the CVS
repository. Before this happens, we have to make sure there are no
collateral damages made to innocent ports.
I'd like people to come to #freebsd-xorg on EFNet this week-end and
coordinate to review this diff [1], so that we
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Can anyone come up with either examples of ports that fall into the
second category above or counter-examples to my first paragraph?
I have used 'make -j' for quite some time, and to my experience it either works
or doesn't. I've never seen a port that works sometimes.
On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:42 PM, David Southwell wrote:
The path to my virtual webs is
/usr2/virtualwebs/my.virtual.site.name
In attempting to create the first list I received no advice email
from the
list but did find the following errors in httpd-errors-log
[Fri Apr 13 10:16:55 2007]
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:55:40PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
As you may know, we're not far from merging xorg modular in the CVS
repository. Before this happens, we have to make sure there are no
collateral damages made to innocent ports.
I'd like people to come to #freebsd-xorg on EFNet
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
No, the patch won't work. According to
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html,
the right way is always define WANT_GNOME which won't pull
any gnome dependencies unless USE_GNOME is used.
I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:32 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
No, the patch won't work. According to
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html,
the right way is always define WANT_GNOME which won't pull
any gnome dependencies unless USE_GNOME is
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:10:47PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Peter Pentchev píše v pá 13. 04. 2007 v 18:06 +0300:
I was thinking about having it embedded in every port's Makefile
directly, instead. Something like
USE_MAKE_JOBS= 2
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:51:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My opinion is that there should be a threshold value empirically derived by
the developer / retrieved by bug reports, as well as a knob, to specify the
maximum number of parallel jobs to be used for a particular port, that
6.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10
I've gotten myself wedged with multiple versions of shared objects.
I've got different versions of libssl and libcrypto in /lib and
/usr/local/lib. I've rebuilt openssl and libssh2 in ports and told
ldconfig to rebuild it's cache
how do gracefully get
Hello maintainers,
I am planning to update graphics/libcaca to 0.99.beta11 (ports/111495).
The update might break those ports that depend on graphics/libcaca, so I
need you to test it for me and let me know if your ports can build. If
your ports can't build, then please follow the guide of
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:31:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Btw, do you think it's possible that a port can only be built with, n
parallel make jobs, but will fail with n+1?
No. I do not think this can be the case.
It certainly is the case. If a makefile has
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:12:21AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:31:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Btw, do you think it's possible that a port can only be built with, n
parallel make jobs, but will fail with n+1?
No. I do not think this
34 matches
Mail list logo
