On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
package. With previous versions the created packages went into /usr/
ports/packages/All. However the packages directory was not
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with them
without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or portconfig-recursive
from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl that open an ncurses dialogue between
configure and build stage very annoying. They
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl that
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl
Hi
Hi I have been out of commission for some time due to some health problems.
When to ujpgrade and received the forllowing error message
can anyone please advise?
Thanks
david
# portupgrade -a
Stale dependency: amavisd-new-2.5.3,1 -- p5-DBD-mysql-4.006 -- manually
run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
Naram Qashat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
Naram Qashat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
Naram Qashat wrote:
I believe a good example of what he might be talking about is the jdk
ports.
Because of the licensing of those ports, they will bring up an EULA that
you
need to read and then type yes afterwards. Even with BATCH set, it
still
stops at that EULA.
With me the
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:50 -0500
Wesley Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
IIRC these ports refuse to fetch the distfiles, and ask you to
fetch them manually from the websites, where you have to agree to
the terms, they aren't actually
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:36:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:50 -0500
Wesley Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
IIRC these ports refuse to fetch the distfiles, and ask you to
fetch them manually from the websites,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the files, which
is even more irritating
Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion?
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does
BATCH apply to package install as well?
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:39:54 -0800
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
package. With previous versions the created packages
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:39:54 -0800
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
I didn't intend for that to be a bug report. :)
Though
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
Naram Qashat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does
BATCH apply to package install as
On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the
files, which is even more irritating
Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion?
--
On Monday 03 March 2008, Beech Rintoul said:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the
files, which is even more irritating
Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0500
Wesley Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:01:00 -0500
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
Though I'm not sure which way it should
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters'
Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one.
Setting BATCH is
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters'
Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one.
Setting BATCH
On 3/3/08, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hi I have been out of commission for some time due to some health problems.
When to ujpgrade and received the forllowing error message
can anyone please advise?
Thanks
david
# portupgrade -a
Stale dependency:
26 matches
Mail list logo
