On 23/05/2008, at 12:35 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Patch and submit a PR? :)
Fair enough - before I RTFM on sending a PR, is this patch OK?
(I had to manually change spaces back into tabs, so not sure how that
part will go ...)
[get latest code]
# portsnap fetch update
[---stuff happens---]
* Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-23-2008]:
I tried to install the above and got the permission denied errors noted at
the bottom, and don't seem to have a server running on the designated port
I decided on. Is this bug ports/110536 still unfixed?
According to the author of webmin, you can
Hi everybody,
One of my ports, archivers/linux-par2cmdline, uses a RPM that contains
documentation, but does not (yet) handle the NOPORTDOCS option. An error is
generated in Tinderbox and complains that documentation files remain on the
filesystem after deinstallation. See :
(the topic is emulation@ relevant, added to CC)
On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
Hi everybody,
One of my ports, archivers/linux-par2cmdline, uses a RPM that contains
documentation, but does not (yet) handle the NOPORTDOCS option. An error is
generated in
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to handle user input in package building mode.
I've got statements like this in my Makefile, and they work fine to
suppress user input from the pkg-install script:
pre-install:
.if !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
@${SETENV} ${SCRIPTS_ENV}
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the build
as root while a different user owns the display. (I do use kdm for
login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
Although it sounds like interactive building, IMHO, building a port with
default options should not fail
Jan Henrik Sylvester writes:
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the
build as root while a different user owns the display. (I do
use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
Built just fine for me, about an hour ago, on -CURRENT with no
hi,
thanks about porting pvpgn to freebsd,
and now pvpgn is update to 1.8.2
but ports is 1.8.1
please help to port to 1.8.2
thanks
AlexW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On Sat, 24 May 2008 13:04:57 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
I'd suggest another option. What about fixing bsd.linux-rpm.mk? Ex.,
one may introduce, say, a pre-install target (or even do it at the
very beginning of a do-install stage) and conditionally delete
unneeded files from WRKDIR (so they
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:38:02PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
...
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the
build as root while a different user owns the display. (I do
use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
Built just fine for
* Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-24-2008]:
You replied only to me; copying the list in this reply.
I tried to install the above and got the permission denied errors noted
at the bottom, and don't seem to have a server running on the designated
port I decided on. Is this bug ports/110536 still
On Sat, 24 May 2008 17:27:04 +0200 (CEST), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
On Sat, 24 May 2008 13:04:57 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
I'd suggest another option. What about fixing bsd.linux-rpm.mk? Ex.,
one may introduce, say, a pre-install target (or even do it at the
very beginning of a
On Sat, 24 May 2008 18:05:42 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 17:27:04 +0200 (CEST), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
On Sat, 24 May 2008 13:04:57 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
I'd suggest another option. What about fixing bsd.linux-rpm.mk? Ex.,
one may introduce, say, a
hi
I have done an upgrade from freeBSD 6.3 to 7.0-RELEASE
and have a newest ports tree update, but cannot install kde-lite.
kde-lite installation hangs with this message:
checking if UIC has KDE plugins available
# portinstall x11/kde-lite
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:49:29 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
Great, but I'd say that it should be done a little bit later (may be
at pre-install stage).
Not sure about that because when using AUTOMATIC_PLIST in bsd.linux-rpm.mk,
pre-install depends on target linux-rpm-generate-plist. So, plist is
Quoting Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 24 May 2008 20:49:29 +0400):
On Sat, 24 May 2008 18:05:42 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 17:27:04 +0200 (CEST), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
On Sat, 24 May 2008 13:04:57 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
I'd suggest
Quoting Ganael LAPLANCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 24 May 2008 19:25:03 +0200
(CEST)):
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:49:29 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
Great, but I'd say that it should be done a little bit later (may be
at pre-install stage).
Not sure about that because when using
On Sat, 24 May 2008 19:38:44 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote
Not sure about that because when using AUTOMATIC_PLIST in bsd.linux-rpm.mk,
AUTOMATIC_PLIST is evil. For linux-rpm ports I see absolutely no value
in using it (we just added it to cut down the noise from one committer,
one or two
Alexander Leidinger wrote at 19:35 +0200 on May 24, 2008:
Removing unwanted stuff in post-extract is not uncommon. I don't think
a patch for linux-rpm.mk with something like this would be a bad
solution.
Removing things in post-extract _should_ be uncommon. If I want
to look at the
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:38:02PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
...
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the
build as root while a different user owns the display. (I do
use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:38:02PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
...
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the
build as root while a different user owns the display. (I do
use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
On Sat, 24 May 2008 12:17:07 -0600, John E Hein wrote
Why not pre- or post-patch - part of a stage that implies a
modification of unpacked distfile(s)?
You are right, pre-patch may be better than post-extract in this way. I think
pre-patch is better than post-patch because one does not want to
On Sat, 24 May 2008 21:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 12:17:07 -0600, John E Hein wrote
Why not pre- or post-patch - part of a stage that implies a
modification of unpacked distfile(s)?
You are right, pre-patch may be better than post-extract in this way. I
On Sun, 25 May 2008 00:00:57 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote
Seems that we found a consensus here ;-)
The patch is OK to me, thanks!
Great, so I'm gonna file a PR for that one...
Best regards,
Ganaël LAPLANCHE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.martymac.com
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Kitche wrote:
Kitche wrote:
David Wolfskill wrote:
My experience was that ImageMagick did build, but it also put up a
little window with a message on it. So my feeling is that the OP is
correct, and that at least on some versions of FreeBSD (in
Matthew Donovan wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Kitche wrote:
As you can see from my original log, X is used.
X is not required, since it is not used, if I build with 'su -' instead
of 'su' (and thus have a clear environment without DISPLAY being set).
If the build tries to
DSS 6.0 has been released: http://dss.macosforge.org
Please update the port for the new version. This has been a widely
anticipated update with many new features and fixes.
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
DSS 6.0 has been released: http://dss.macosforge.org
Please update the port for the new version. This has been a widely
anticipated update with many new features and fixes.
When you contacted nork, what'd he say about it? Has he
worked on the porting, tested, and been able
* Terry Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-24-2008]:
Please avoid top-posting.
In addition to the updated source code, the DSS project has been migrated
to the Mac OS forge web site. Information related to the project including
source code downloads, release notes and
I haven't heard from him yet. Developer.apple.com is no longer being
updated. See the following statement from Apple:
In addition to the updated source code, the DSS project has been migrated
to the Mac OS forge web site. Information related to the project including
source code downloads, release
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:54:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on
31 matches
Mail list logo
