Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port. Now that I am able to directly download the sources of SAGA GIS from sourceforge (thanks to Eygene Ryabinkin and Sergey V. Dyatko), there is another problem with porting where I need some help. The original configure script of SAGA

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the

Re: Getting MASTER_SITES for sourceforge ports more easily

On 14.11.2009 08:54 (UTC+1), Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 09:16:47AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: The attached shell script should produce the MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR for the SF-hosted ports for each URL given in the command-line. Inlining the script -- it was dropped by the

Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: The original configure script of SAGA GIS expects 'wx-config', but in newer FreeBSD systems there only is e.g. wxgtk2-2.8-config. The porters handbook shows how to configure the ports Makefile to let the port know what wxWidget

Re: Is there any reason to keep sysutils/rc_subr?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:49:02AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: I'm wondering if there is any reason to keep sysutils/rc_subr around? In bsd.port.mk the default sub for %%RC_SUBR%% is already /etc/rc.subr, and all supported platforms have always had that file. After the release of 8.0 I'd like

Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

Hello Eygene, On 14.11.2009 12:36 (UTC+1), Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: The original configure script of SAGA GIS expects 'wx-config', but in newer FreeBSD systems there only is e.g. wxgtk2-2.8-config. The porters handbook shows how to

Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:58:02PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: BTW, there is absolutely no need to specify WX_CONFIG in your Makefile, bsd.wx.mk will take care of it. WX_CONF_ARGS seems redundant too: SAGA's configure understands no --with-wx-config option, so it is just a no-op. Both

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

Wesley Shields wrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:00:08AM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: Actually I was thinking of eventually adding non-svn support as well I don't think bloating bsd.*.mk for the most common VCS out there is a good idea, not to mention what happens when someone wants support

Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

On 14.11.2009 15:56 (UTC+1), Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:58:02PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: BTW, there is absolutely no need to specify WX_CONFIG in your Makefile, bsd.wx.mk will take care of it. WX_CONF_ARGS seems redundant too: SAGA's configure understands no

Re: Question about creating a port for saga gis

Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: Thank you again, Eygene. You're welcome ;)) I will now prepare for submitting a PR with this new port. I'll try to do a Tinderbox build of your port to see if the packaging and dependency list is complete. I think that the

Re: Is there any reason to keep sysutils/rc_subr?

Jilles Tjoelker wrote: A separate rc_subr port may be useful in case new functions are added to rc.subr, and it is desired to use these functions on systems that do not have them in /etc/rc.subr. There have not been any substantive changes to the port in over 5 years, thus I find this argument

p5-xmltv - old?

Hello, Is there a reason why p5-xmltv haven't been updated? In ports we have version 0.5.52, but on the main web site version 0.5.56 have been available a while now. Simply chnaging the version in the Makefile, removing the PORTREVISION line and doing 'make makesum' get the port working: