Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

2011-03-19 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as firefox.   It can't be too soon.  I have not found any drawbacks to it in the couple weeks of testing. Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread wen heping
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into : devel devel-perl devel-python wen 2011/3/19 Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org: Hey, as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second largest with over 2000

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0800, wen heping wrote: devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into : devel devel-perl devel-python My own view is that naming the categories by language (e.g. java) is not a good idea. I'd rather divide things up by what they do, rather

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400: If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3 No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time. -- -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org The use of the lavatory is restricted to the

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 08:52 +0100: Martin Wilke ha scritto: www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients, benchmarks www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries www (rest, not

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Eric
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into : devel devel-perl devel-python wen Is that not partially why we have the virtual categories to provide language divisions (not to mention port name prefixes)? I think were devel to be split 'broad' functionality would be the

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 19.03.2011 02:49, schrieb Martin Wilke: Hey, as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Martin Wilke wrote: [...] www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines .. http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/cat/www-client.txt

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Alex Dupre
Miroslav Lachman ha scritto: Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server? I can't find them on the www-server list or www. Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server. -- Alex Dupre ___

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Alex Dupre
Pav Lucistnik ha scritto: I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java libraries. Even if they are not webapp, from this categorization I'd say they should go there, but I found one in www and one in www-clients. Both will be moved to -clients, thanks. So -clients is the

fact-finding: problems after recent Xorg upgrade

2011-03-19 Thread Robert Huff
I know this about x11@; I am looking to answer is it just me? before I talk to them. System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Oct 23 08:15:53 EDT 2010 amd64 xorg-7.5.1 fvwm-2.5.31 xorg.conf is appended Since the upgrade to xorg-7.5.1, I have had issues with ... focus, for

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 3/19/2011 6:09 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400: If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3 No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time. Okay w/ me. --

Re: fact-finding: problems after recent Xorg upgrade

2011-03-19 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Robert Huff (roberth...@rcn.com): System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Oct 23 08:15:53 EDT 2010 amd64 xorg-7.5.1 fvwm-2.5.31 xorg.conf is appended Since the upgrade to xorg-7.5.1, I have had issues with ... focus, for lack of a better diagnosis. Works for me... Notable

Re: fact-finding: problems after recent Xorg upgrade

2011-03-19 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Robert Huff wrote: I know this about x11@; I am looking to answer is it just me? before I talk to them. System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Oct 23 08:15:53 EDT 2010 amd64 xorg-7.5.1 fvwm-2.5.31 xorg.conf is appended Since the upgrade to

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:29 +0100: Pav Lucistnik ha scritto: I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java libraries. Even if they are not webapp, from this categorization I'd say they should go there, but I found one in www and one in www-clients.

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/3/19 Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com: On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category. Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general key to the new categories is as follows: [...]

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 at 12:18:42 PDT Olivier Smedts wrote: 2011/3/19 Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com: On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category. Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:24 +0100: Miroslav Lachman ha scritto: Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server? I can't find them on the www-server list or www. Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server. Good God, they

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Thomas Sandford píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:12 +: On 19/03/2011 01:49, Martin Wilke wrote: as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories

Re: fact-finding: problems after recent Xorg upgrade

2011-03-19 Thread perryh
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Oct 23 08:15:53 EDT 2010 amd64 xorg-7.5.1 fvwm-2.5.31 ... Since the upgrade to xorg-7.5.1, I have had issues with ... focus, for lack of a better diagnosis. Before, as I move the 3x3 desktop focus followed the

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Henk van Oers
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100: [...] Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on the other hand http servers ... everything related to apache? IOW, how do I decide if I put a new port into www-webapps or

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Zhihao Yuan
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote: From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100: [...] Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on the other hand http servers ... everything related

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Lars Engels
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:49:39AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Hey, as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories spinned out. On the other

gstreamer-plugins-core build failure

2011-03-19 Thread AN
FreeBSD test.fu.bar 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #8 r219565: Sat Mar 12 19:07:56 IST 2011 r...@test.fu.bar:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@test /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-core]# make install clean === gstreamer-plugins-core-0.10_12 depends on package:

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

2011-03-19 Thread Denny Lin
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote: On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600 Edwin L. Culp W.edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as firefox. It can't be too soon. I have

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Eitan Adler
www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients, benchmarks www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines .. IMHO html editors

sysutils/monitorix

2011-03-19 Thread MJBrune
Hello, I am looking for a volunteer to upgrade the systutils/monitorix to 2.1.0 from its current version. Please let me know if you are able to. Thank you very much for your time. -- Michael James Brune 206-552-8572 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 3/19/2011 8:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients, benchmarks www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring